The secret plot to depose Trump

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Saturday, February 7, 2026 22:19
VIEWED: 36601
PAGE 16 of 49

1KIKI

Tuesday, June 18, 2019 3:37 AM

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

But also because - and this is addressed to you old fart, and to you cereal-mush-brains - these specifics claims by Nunes are facts.

So unless you can refute them WITH FACTS AND LINKS - and I know you can't - stop using this website as your personal bathroom.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SECOND:
fart

---

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

6IXSTRINGJACK

Tuesday, June 18, 2019 3:45 AM

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

But also because - and this is addressed to you old fart, and to you cereal-mush-brains - these specifics claims by Nunes are facts.

So unless you can refute them WITH FACTS AND LINKS - and I know you can't - stop using this website as your personal bathroom.


And if democrats don't do anything different, how are they any better?
tic tac

---

Trump said: "No collusion, no obstruction." in big TV interview. www.cnn.com/2019/06/17/politics/donald-trump-george-stephanopoulos-abc
/index.html
But that is not what Mueller said. Here's what the report said: "(I)f we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. ... Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

And collusion? Mueller said on page 2 that collusion does not mean anything legally and he wished that fucking idiots and Trump would stop using that word: "In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.” In so doing, the Office recognized that the word “collud[ej” was used in communications with the Acting Attorney General confirming certain aspects of the investigation’s scope and that the term has frequently been invoked in public reporting about the investigation. But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law. In connection with that analysis, we addressed the factual question whether members of the Trump Campaign “coordinat[ed]”—a term that appears in the appointment order—with Russian election interference activities. Like collusion, “coordination” does not have a settled definition in federal criminal law. We understood coordination to require an agreement—tacit or express—between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference. That requires more than the two parties taking actions that were informed by or responsive to the other’s actions or interests. We applied the term coordination in that sense when stating in the report that the investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

Everybody and Mueller knows Trump can't even coordinate with his Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, who he sees everyday. There is no way for Trump to coordinate with Putin because Trump can't get his shit together. He's stupid.
www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2019/06/17/trump-kicks
-out-mulvaney-coughing-stephanopoulos-abc-interview/1475364001/

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

JONGSSTRAW

Tuesday, June 18, 2019 5:06 AM

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Partial transcript of the video.

Quote:

---

more than 2 years since democrats from this publicly committee claimed to have more than circumstantial evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to hack the 2016 presidential election

---

And what was Mueller's conclusion, again? NO COLLUSION. And that 'evidence'? Not so much.

Quote:

---

more than 2 years since they read false allegations from the Steele dossier into the Congressional record

---

WAS there false evidence in the Steele 'dossier'? Yes.

Quote:

---

endless hysteria by the media, democrats, and anonymous intelligence leakers

---

Yep. There were frequent new breathless allegations; and multiple repeating and rehashing of old ones on a DAILY basis online, in print, and on TV; not to mention of course an actual committee wasting their valuable time NOT doing the people's business.

Quote:

---

bombshell story ... ... which purportedly proved Trump or some Trump associate was a treacherous Russian agent.

---

Yep. And I don't even need to go elsewhere to find the proof. All I need to do is quote you gullible, weak-minded, and morally-corrupted people HERE. You know who you are. Don't you old fart. Don't you old cereal-mush-brains.

Quote:

---

Democrats on this committee regularly joined the news pundits in denouncing the traitors ...

---

A fact.

Quote:

---

The entire scheme has imploded, and the collusion accusation has become exposed as a hoax ...

---

Though, I think it's more than a hoax.

Quote:

---

One would think the democrats would simply apologize and get on with the business of lawmaking and oversight.

---

One would think. One would think the democrats would have just a small bit of shame about being so very wrong. One would think that a small bit of reflection would be in order.

Quote:

---

After years of false accusations and McCarthyite smears, the collusion hoax now defines the democratic party.

---

It sure does seem to. Democrats have no single unifying idea, or legislative goal, beyond that.

Quote:

---

The Mueller dossier, as I now call it, debunked many of their conspiracies or did not even find them worthy of discussing.

---

Here we get to the laundry list of specific bombshell 'revelations' and 'news reports' that were false accusations, but which were flogged endlessly as if they were facts.

Quote:

---

Michael Cohen did not travel to Prague to conspire with the Russians
No evidence that Carter Paige conspired with Russians.
No mention of Paul Manafort visiting Julian Assange in London.
No mention of secret communications between a Trump Tower computer server and Russia's Alfa Bank.
And no mention of NRA's former lawyer Cleta Mitchell or her supposed knowledge of a scheme to launder Russian money though the NRA for the Trump campaign. ... These insinuations against Mitchell originated with Fusion GPS Chief Glenn Simpson, and were first made public in a document published by democrats on this committee.
A long litany of ordinary contacts between Trump associates and Russians (please note - since the Mueller report concluded there was no collusion, these contacts are, according the report, ordinary), as if a certain number of contacts indicate a conspiracy even if no conversations actually created or discussed a conspiracy.
Excerpts from a voice mail from John Dowd that the Mueller team selectively edited to make it seem threatening and nefarious.
No comment on the close relationship between democrat operatives and Fusion GPS and MULTIPLE Russians (who) participated in the June 9th, 2016 meeting at Trump Tower.
In fact, no comment or mention of Fusion GPS at all.
No useful information on figures who played key roles in the investigation, such as Joseph Misfud a Malta diplomat, or the Australian diplomat Alexander Downer, or the democrat-paid operative, former spy Christopher Steele.
No useful information about the many irregularities that marred the FBI's Russia investigation.
Furthermore, the Mueller dossier cites d

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME