Mueller Investigation Is Over / Part two are the trials. Hey Jack, I Was Right. 20 Plus Russians Charged, 19 Of Trumps People Convicted of Felonies.

POSTED BY: THG
UPDATED: Monday, August 31, 2026 21:49
VIEWED: 129258
PAGE 25 of 157

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
"Denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance."

You seem to be moving towards anger.

Well, that's progress, I guess!!

---

I was comparing Trump to Chris Pine, the bank robber who attained enormous wealth and got away from Texas Ranger Jeff Bridges, in the movie Hell or High Water. But Trump might be the other bank robber who does not think ahead, the stupid brother of Chris Pine. We will find out which brother Trump is. How stupid is Trump if he closes the border with Mexico? That's a plan that will work about as well as the 35 day government shutdown to build a Mexican Wall. My dependable Trump voters think both plans will/would work if Trump just kept/keeps things shutdown until Congress/Mexico gives Trump what he wants.
www.metacritic.com/movie/hell-or-high-water

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
"Denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance."

You seem to be moving towards anger.

Well, that's progress, I guess!!


-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND

America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876 .

---

lol

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
G: "I think you should just stay focused on helping pedophiles get their message out, Mr. Censorship is Censorship. Don't overheat that little brain of yours with too many challenges."

What the fuck are you talking about?

---

Aren't you the "Censorship is Censorship" champion? Since you can't be bothered to think things through, you found yourself defending pedophiles' rights to harass kids on a fourm. Good one, Nancy.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Here's your post. Show me where it says unredacted to Congress.

---

Show me where it says unredacted to the public.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
That reads as if an unredacted report that the Undecideds could read would be persuasive. I don't give two shits if that's not what you meant.

---

"I don't care about the meaning of anything!" What a whiner.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Learn how to write.

---

Learn how to think.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Trump investigation: Russia collusion evidence detailed by Schiff in damning address in Congress
House intelligence committee chair responds to letter by Republicans calling for his resignation
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-ru
ssia-collusion-mueller-report-adam-schiff-speech-congress-a8844136.html?utm_source=reddit.com&utm_source=reddit.com

My colleagues may think it's ok that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what was described as the Russian government's effort to help the Trump campaign. You may think that's ok.

My colleagues may think it's ok that when that was offered to the son of the President, who had a pivotal role in that campaign, that the son did not call the FBI, that he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help. No; instead that son said that he would love the help of the Russians. You might think it's ok that he took that meeting.

You might think it's okay that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience in running campaigns, also took that meeting.

You might think it's ok that the President's son in law also took that meeting.

You might think it's ok that they concealed it from the public.

You might think it's ok that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn't better. You might think that's ok.

You might think it's ok that when it was discovered a year later that they lied about that meeting and said it was about adoptions. You might think it's ok that the President is reported to have helped dictate that lie. You might think that's ok.

I don't.

You might think it's ok that the campaign chairman of a presidential campaign would offer information about that campaign to a Russian oligarch in exchange for money or debt forgiveness. You might that that's ok.

I don't.

You might think it's ok that that campaign chairman offered polling data, campaign polling data, to someone linked to Russian intelligence.

I don't think that's ok!

You might think it's ok that the President himself called on Russia to hack his opponent's emails if they were listening.

You might think it's ok that later that day in fact the Russians attempted to hack a server affiliated with that campaign.

I don't think that's ok.

You might think it's ok that the President's son in law sought to establish a secret back-channel of communications to the Russians through a Russian diplomatic facility.

I don't think that's ok.

ou might think it's ok that an associate of the President made direct contact with the GRU through Guccifer 2 and wikileaks, which is considered a hostile intelligence agency.

You might think it's ok that a senior campaign official was instructed to reach that associate and find out what that hostile intelligence agency had to say in terms of dirt on his opponent.

You might think it's ok that the National Security Advisor designate secretly conferred with the Russian ambassador about undermining US sanctions, and you might think it's ok that he lied about it to the FBI.

You might think that's all ok! You might think that's just what you need to do to win!

But I don't think it's ok.

I think it's immoral,

I think it's unethical,

I think it's unpatriotic, and yes,

I think it's corrupt and evidence of collusion.

Now I have always said that whether this amounts to proof of conspiracy was another matter. Whether the special counsel can prove beyond a reasonable doubt, the proof of that crime would be up to the Special Counsel and I would accept his decision, and I do. He is a good and honorable man and a good prosecutor. But I do not think that conduct, criminal or not, is ok. And the day we do think that's ok is the day we will look back and say America lost its way.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

I know I posted the video here. It's also why I say wait for it. It's all in the report and then some. When Congress gets people to testify in public hearing, hearings where they need to explain all this shit, heads will roll.

tick tock
T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Trump investigation: Russia collusion evidence detailed by Schiff in damning address in Congress
House intelligence committee chair responds to letter by Republicans calling for his resignation
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-ru
ssia-collusion-mueller-report-adam-schiff-speech-congress-a8844136.html?utm_source=reddit.com&utm_source=reddit.com

My colleagues may think it's ok that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what was described as the Russian government's effort to help the Trump campaign. You may think that's ok.

My colleagues may think it's ok that when that was offered to the son of the President, who had a pivotal role in that campaign, that the son did not call the FBI, that he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help. No; instead that son said that he would love the help of the Russians. You might think it's ok that he took that meeting.

You might think it's okay that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience in running campaigns, also took that meeting.

You might think it's ok that the President's son in law also took that meeting.

You might think it's ok that they concealed it from the public.

You might think it's ok that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn't better. You might think that's ok.

You might think it's ok that when it was discovered a year later that they lied about that meeting and said it was about adoptions. You might think it's ok that the President is reported to have helped dictate that lie. You might think that's ok.

I don't.

You might think it's ok that the campaign chairman of a presidential campaign would offer information about that campaign to a Russian oligarch in exchange for money or debt forgiveness. You might that that's ok.

I don't.

You might think it's ok that that campaign chairman offered polling data, campaign polling data, to someone linked to Russian intelligence.

I don't think that's ok!

You might think it's ok that the President himself called on Russia to hack his opponent's emails if they were listening.

You might think it's ok that later that day in fact the Russians attempted to hack a server affiliated with that campaign.

I don't think that's ok.

You might think it's ok that the President's son in law sought to establish a secret back-channel of communications to the Russians through a Russian diplomatic facility.

I don't think that's ok.

ou might think it's ok that an associate of the President made direct contact with the GRU through Guccifer 2 and wikileaks, which is considered a hostile intelligence agency.

You might think it's ok that a senior campaign official was instructed to reach that associate and find out what that hostile intelligence agency had to say in terms of dirt on his opponent.

You might think it's ok that the National Security Advisor designate secretly conferred with the Russian ambassador about undermining US sanctions, and you might think it's ok that he lied about it to the FBI.

You might think that's all ok! You might think that's just what you need to do to win!

But I don't think it's ok.

I think it's immoral,

I think it's unethical,

I think it's unpatriotic, and yes,

I think it's corrupt and evidence of collusion.

Now I have always said that whether this a

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME