Countdown Clock to Trumps impeachment " STARTS"
POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Monday, April 14, 2025 23:28
VIEWED: 485499
PAGE 183 of 404
Yeah, J0. Like the man said. We get to hear about this at least another 2 years without anybody actually doing anything.
Looks like T is coming to terms with the fact that a Democratic lead house isn't going to vote for impeachment. I wonder if you'll be as satisfied reasoning away why that is?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Looks like the dummy still hasn't learned how to read JO.
T ![]()
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
lol
We'll see who's the dummy.
Ball's in the Democrat's court.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
!
Coud it be that Nancy Pelosi duznt understand the danjer? That she wants Putinz puppet to stay in ofis for the political advantaj?
Its like letting your enemy drive your car! "Good! He'z scraching up the paint & making dents! He'z getting into more troubl all the time!"
"But wut if he smashez it into an abutment? Or reks a smaller car possibly killing the occupants? Or killz a pedestrian?"
"Gu, he can do that?"
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com .
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Ralph Waldo Emerson explained why succinctly: “When you strike at a king, you must kill him.” So long as the House Democratic leadership know that at least 34 GOP Senators are afraid of the revenge Trump voters would take against those Senators, the Senators will refuse to convict Trump. That makes it futile for the House to vote for impeachment.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Looks like T is coming to terms with the fact that a Democratic lead house isn't going to vote for impeachment. I wonder if you'll be as satisfied reasoning away why that is?
At the present moment there are 53 GOP Senate votes guaranteed not to convict, no matter what Trump did. For those Republican Senators voting to convict Trump would be like them voting to execute the Father of their political party. The family of Trump voters would rise up against such a Senator. Until a majority of Trump voters peel away from Trump in a state that elected a Republican Senator, no Republican Senators will ever vote to convict Trump of anything, no matter how high the pile of evidence there is to justify a conviction.
http://radar.oreilly.com/2007/09/emerson-and-oliver-wendell-hol.html
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Here's What Could Be Ahead In The Russia Investigations In 2019
One incoming Democratic chairman, Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, fired a warning shot well before the new Congress was even seated: He announced that he has sent 51 letters to "the White House, multiple federal agencies and others requesting full compliance" with existing requests for information by Jan. 11.
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/01/678332805/heres-what-could-be-ahead-in-
the-russia-investigations-in-2019
tick tock
T ![]()
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Ralph Waldo Emerson explained why succinctly: “When you strike at a king, you must kill him.” So long as the House Democratic leadership know that at least 34 GOP Senators are afraid of the revenge Trump voters would take against those Senators, the Senators will refuse to convict Trump. That makes it futile for the House to vote for impeachment.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Looks like T is coming to terms with the fact that a Democratic lead house isn't going to vote for impeachment. I wonder if you'll be as satisfied reasoning away why that is?
At the present moment there are 53 GOP Senate votes guaranteed not to convict, no matter what Trump did. For those Republican Senators voting to convict Trump would be like them voting to execute the Father of their political party. The family of Trump voters would rise up against such a Senator. Until a majority of Trump voters peel away from Trump in a state that elected a Republican Senator, no Republican Senators will ever vote to convict Trump of anything, no matter how high the pile of evidence there is to justify a conviction.
http://radar.oreilly.com/2007/09/emerson-and-oliver-wendell-hol.html
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
If for absolutely no other reason in the world, this is why there will never be an impeachment vote. Second is right about this here.
It's exactly what the Democrats would do if the tables were turned.
Somebody is going to have to come up with undoctored video evidence of Trump with Putin's cock up his ass if you want impeachment.
How many days left on that impeachment clock, JSF?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:It can takes years for Americans to recognize a conman despite mountains of circumstantial evidence they are being conned. Here is an example, applicable to Trump, about how that works:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
If for absolutely no other reason in the world, this is why there will never be an impeachment vote. Second is right about this here.
It's exactly what the Democrats would do if the tables were turned.
Somebody is going to have to come up with undoctored video evidence of Trump with Putin's cock up his ass if you want impeachment.
The number one, best book of the year, is Bad Blood by John Carreyrou
Free copy by bit torrent is here:
https://1337x.to/torrent/3011918/Bad-Blood-by-John-Carreyrou-EPUB/
The review that ties the book into Trump:
www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2019/01/top-1-books/
Bad Blood is about the rise and fall of Elizabeth Holmes and her company Theranos, which promised to transform the field of blood testing. I’ve had a chance to mention this book to a few people who have read it, and we all had the same reaction: utter, stunned disbelief. Even if you’ve read all of Carreyrou’s reporting on Theranos for the Wall Street Journal, you still don’t understand a fraction of the story. The whole thing was a long con from the very start, and one that lasted nearly a decade based on literally nothing more than the strength of Holmes’s ability to mesmerize investors, regulators, board members, and even her own employees. You simply have to read it to believe it.
The fact that Holmes could do what she did in the midst of the self-proclaimed smartest people in the world sure doesn’t say anything good about Silicon Valley. In the end, I suppose what it really tells us is just how unprepared most of are for a person who’s willing to lie to our faces persistently and persuasively. This is how Donald Trump gets away with lying to his core base and how fraudulent journalists can ply their trade for so long. As cynical and perceptive as we like to think of ourselves, it rarely occurs to us that someone is just flatly making stuff up, if only because these kinds of lies obviously can’t be sustained, so why would anyone be dumb enough to traffic in them?
And yet some people are—or perhaps it’s better to say that they aren’t dumb so much as they combine an eye-watering level of confidence in their ability to BS people on the fly with a fear of being caught out that’s so intense it keeps roping them in further and further. Charles Ponzi had it. Bernie Madoff had it. And Elizabeth Holmes had it. (If Trump stays on long enough, Americans might realize he is a member of this super conman group. Obvious to me, GOP Senators are NOT going to act against Trump until a majority of Trump voters realize they have been conned. And the GOP Senators feel no obligation to make that clear except for the rare bird such as soon-to-be-retired GOP Senator Jeff Flake. https://qz.com/1181975/ )
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Harry Reid, former Senate majority leader, on President Trump
www.nytimes.com/2019/01/02/magazine/harry-reid-senate-cancer-trump.htm
l
Reid attended high school in Henderson, hitchhiking 45 miles each way from his hometown, Searchlight: a drive-through smudge of a town between Las Vegas and Needles, Calif., which, in his youth, boasted at least a half-dozen brothels and not a single church. His acidic outlook was informed by his childhood, during which he endured extreme poverty and dysfunction and substance abuse in his family. He took up boxing in high school and put himself through George Washington University Law School by working as a Capitol Police officer. Back in Nevada, he was schooled in the piranha bowl of Las Vegas politics. This education included a stint as Nevada’s gaming chairman in the 1970s, which placed him in the cross hairs of the Las Vegas mob. (Some of the plot of the film “Casino” was based loosely on Reid’s experiences.) There were numerous threats to his life and at least one actual attempt (a bomb discovered under the hood of his family car).
The former F.B.I. director James Comey, after he was fired by Trump, compared Trump to the head of a mafia family, with its codes of silence and loyalty, its fear-based leadership style and fealty to a single godfather. “It’s not about anything else except the boss,” Comey said in a recent interview at the 92nd Street Y in New York. Others have drawn the same parallel, and I asked Reid if, given his unusually relevant professional experience in this area, it rang true. Reid expelled a quick and dismissive chuckle. “Organized crime is a business,” he told me, “and they are really good with what they do. But they are better off when things are predictable. In my opinion, they do not do well with chaos. And that’s what we have going with Trump.”
Still, Reid added: “Trump is an interesting person. He is not immoral but is amoral. Amoral is when you shoot someone in the head, it doesn’t make a difference. No conscience.” There was a hint of grudging respect in Reid’s tone, which he seemed to catch and correct. “I think he is without question the worst president we’ve ever had,” he said. “We’ve had some bad ones, and there’s not even a close second to him.” He added: “He’ll lie. He’ll cheat. You can’t reason with him.” Once more, a hint of wonder crept into his voice, as if he was describing a rogue beast on the loose in a jungle that Reid knows well.
More at www.nytimes.com/2019/01/02/magazine/harry-reid-senate-cancer-trump.htm
l
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:It can takes years for Americans to recognize a conman despite mountains of circumstantial evidence they are being conned.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
If for absolutely no other reason in the world, this is why there will never be an impeachment vote. Second is right about this here.
It's exactly what the Democrats would do if the tables were turned.
Somebody is going to have to come up with undoctored video evidence of Trump with Putin's cock up his ass if you want impeachment.
Sure he's a con man.
Not only is he a politician right now (where it's a prerequisite for the job), but he was a successful business man like you for many years (where it's a prerequisite for the job).
He's not conning me. At least not any more than Hillary would have or GWB and Obama did.
They're all scum.
Doesn't mean that I buy any of the Russia bullshit though.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME