Countdown Clock to Trumps impeachment " STARTS"
POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Monday, April 14, 2025 23:28
VIEWED: 485499
PAGE 129 of 404
I think THUGGER might be confused by the shifting baselines used in the descriptions. Let's say I run a poll and the results are: 1/3 think the earth is flat, 1/3 think the earth is a globe, and 1/3 aren't sure. I could state "a minority thinks the earth is a globe", or I could state "an overwhelming majority aren't convinced the earth is flat". Same numbers, and both are completely accurate summaries, but you get a different impression from each.
That's why it's FAR better to access the actual polls (what questions were asked, in what context, what categories were given), as well as the actual numbers.
What I found interesting is that opinions about Trump have remained steady over MONTHS. But only the most recent numbers were discussed, as if they were, somehow, 'new's - as if they were the newest thing that was different and worthy of attention. Also, people who think the investigation should be wrapped up soon increased beyond the margin of error, as a result of lower within error numbers of "weren't sure/ had no opinion", and lower within error numbers of "continue".
THUGGER admits it's not about RUSSIA !!! and is, in fact, a witch hunt. "Trump better be innocent of any wrong doing, anywhere, anytime."
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.
T
Your post here means nothing.
I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.
If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.
Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.
OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."
Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.
Dummy...
T
The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.
I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.
If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.
And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.
Have a nice day. :)
Do Right, Be Right. :)Quote:
Jack
The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:Quote:
Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.
That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.
Wrong. I am quoting you above.
Dummy...
T
Yup. So you are.
I quoted that from the article that you linked.
Read it for the first time, since you obviously haven't read it yet and then we'll have a discussion.
Nice guy that I am, I'll even give you a hint. It's about 12 to 14 paragraphs down from the beginning of the article.
You do realize that you can scroll down and read more, right? They even have these great computer mice with scrol
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:Let's say I run a poll and the results are: 1/3 think the earth is flat, 1/3 think the earth is a globe, and 1/3 aren't sure.
You forgot the .1% hoo think the Earth iz a cube.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.
T
Your post here means nothing.
I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.
If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.
Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.
OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."
Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.
Dummy...
T
The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.
I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.
If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.
And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.
Have a nice day. :)
Do Right, Be Right. :)Quote:
Jack
The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:Quote:
Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.
That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.
Wrong. I am quoting you above.
Dummy...
T
Yup. So you are.
I quoted that from the article that you linked.
Read it for the first time, since you obviously haven't read it yet and then we'll have a discussion.
Nice guy that I am, I'll even give you a hint. It's about 12 to 14 paragraphs down from the beginning of the article.
You do realize that you can scroll down and read more, right? They even have
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.
T
Your post here means nothing.
I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.
If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.
Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.
OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."
Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.
Dummy...
T
The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.
I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.
If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.
And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.
Have a nice day. :)
Do Right, Be Right. :)Quote:
Jack
The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:Quote:
Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.
That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.
Wrong. I am quoting you above.
Dummy...
T
Yup. So you are.
I quoted that from the article that you linked.
Read it for the first time, since you obviously haven't read it yet and then we'll have a discussion.
Nice guy that I am, I'll even give you a hint. It's about 12 to 14 paragraphs down from the beginning of the article.
You do realize that you can scroll down and read more, right? They even have
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The only poll that counts is the poll of the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Originally posted by JO753:Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:Let's say I run a poll and the results are: 1/3 think the earth is flat, 1/3 think the earth is a globe, and 1/3 aren't sure.
You forgot the .1% hoo think the Earth iz a cube.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
There is a single question on the poll: "Are you A) Republican? or B) Democrat?"
If the answer is A) then Trump voters can ignore impeachment talk and can disregard all evidence. If the answer is B) then there is a second poll to be taken of Senators.
It also only has one question, the same question: "Are you A) Republican? or B) Democrat?"
If the answer is A) for 34 or more Senators, then Trump voters can ignore impeachment talk and can disregard all evidence. On the other hand, Trump does not understand polls, so he is always freaked out by every little development. Trump talks like a mob boss — and reminds us he has no idea what he’s doing. Someday we may want a president who knows what he’s talking about.
www.vox.com/2018/8/23/17772990/trump-fox-and-friends-transcript
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Someday we may want a president who knows what he’s talking about.
Haven't seen one yet in my lifetime.
You're older than I am though. Maybe you have.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
JO753 for president!!!
T 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
The Case Against Impeaching Trump
- Alan Dershowitz
Alan Dershowitz has been called “one of the most prominent and consistent defenders of civil liberties in America” by Politico and “the nation’s most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer and one of its most distinguished defenders of individual rights” by Newsweek. Yet he has come under partisan fire for applying those same principles to Donald Trump during the course of his many appearances in national media outlets as an expert resource on civil and constitutional law...
“In the fervor to impeach President Trump, his political enemies have ignored the text of the Constitution. As a civil libertarian who voted against Trump, I remind those who would impeach him not to run roughshod over a document that has protected us all for two and a quarter centuries. In this case against impeachment, I make arguments similar to those I made against the impeachment of President Bill Clinton (and that I would be making had Hillary Clinton been elected and Republicans were seeking to impeach her). Impeachment and removal of a president are not entirely political decisions by Congress. Every member takes an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution sets out specific substantive criteria that MUST be met.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND
America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Today’s Crazy Trump Tweet:
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
What’s going on at @CNN is happening, to different degrees, at other networks - with @NBCNews being the worst. The good news is that Andy Lack(y) is about to be fired(?) for incompetence, and much worse. When Lester Holt got caught fudging my tape on Russia, they were hurt badly!
6:02 AM - Aug 30, 2018
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1035120511259500544
I’m sure you haven’t forgotten this, but here’s the tape of Trump’s interview with Lester Holt shortly after he fired James Comey:
This was basically an admission that he fired Comey because of the Russia investigation. It’s been out there for more than a year, just sitting around for everyone to hear over and over and over: a bald admission that Trump obstructed justice. For some reason Trump never seemed to understand just how badly he had incriminated himself in this interview, but it sounds like maybe one of his lawyers finally got through to him. So now there’s a new story: Lester Holt fudged the tape!
This is, needless to say, ridiculous and unhinged. Trump must be completely freaked out at this point, and after telling this absurd lie about fudging the tape his lawyers must be freaked out too. Telling an obvious tall tale in an effort to discredit a piece of damaging evidence does nothing except make the evidence even more damaging in a court of law. This whole thing is really starting to come unraveled.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME