This is Why Trump is a SCUMBAG!
POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 22:00
VIEWED: 74665
PAGE 61 of 70
Quote:
The "Magnitsky Trio" Pushes For War With Russia With New Sanctions
Tom Luongo,
If half of what I have come to understand about the Curious Case of Bill Browder is true, then the “Magnitsky Trio” of Senators John McCain, Lindsay Graham and Ben Cardin are guilty of espionage, at a minimum.
Why? Because they know that Browder’s story about Sergei Magnitsky is a lie. And that means that when you tie in the Trump Dossier, Christopher Steele, Fusion GPS, the Skripal poisoning and the rest of this mess, these men are consorting with foreign governments and agencies against the sitting President.
As Lee Stranahan pointed out recently on Fault Lines, Cardin invited Browder to testify to Congress in 2017 to push through last year’s sanctions bill, a more stringent version of the expiring Magnitsky Act of 2011, which has since been used to ratchet up pressure on Russia.
Cardin knew there were problems with Browder’s story about Magnitsky’s death and yet brought him into Congress to testify to secure the vote.
That’s suborning perjury, as Lee points out.
Just the holes in Browder’s story about Magnitsky’s death are alone enough to warrant a perjury charge on him. If you haven’t read Luck Komisar’s detailed breakdown of Browder’s dealings then you owe it to yourself to do so. www.thekomisarscoop.com/2017/11/the-man-behind-the-magnitsky-act-did-b
ill-browders-tax-troubles-in-russia-color-push-for-sanctions/
I’d read it a few times, because it’s about as murky as The Swamp gets. And, still my eyes glaze over.
The Magnitsky Act and its sequel have been used to support aggressive policy actions by the U.S. against Russia and destroy the relationship between the world’s most prominent militaries and nuclear powers.
The new bill is said to want to put ‘crushing sanctions’ on Russia to make ‘Putin feel the heat.’ In effect, what this bill wants to do is force President Trump to enforce sanctions against the entire Russian state for attempting to do business anywhere in the world.
The new financial penalties would target political figures, oligarchs, family members and others that “facilitate illicit and corrupt activities” on behalf of Putin.
It would also impose new sanctions on transactions tied to investments in state-owned energy projects, transactions tied to new Russian debt, and people with the capacity or ability to support or carry out a “malicious” cyber act.
In addition, if it wasn’t clear enough already, that he’s no friend of the President, Graham is trying to tie the President’s hands on NATO withdrawal, requiring a two-thirds majority.
Now, why would Graham be worried about that, unless it was something the President was seriously considering? This is similar to last year’s sanctions bill requiring a similar majority for the President to end the original sanctions placed on Russia in 2014 over the reunification with Crimea.
And behind it all stands Bill Browder.
Because it has been Browder’s one-man campaign to influence members of Congress, the EU and public opinion the world over against Putin and Russia for the past 10 years over Magnitsky’s death.
Browder’s story is the only one we see in the news. And it’s never questioned, even though it has. He continually moves to block films and articles critical of him from seeing distribution.
Browder is the epicenter around which the insane push for war with Russia revolves as everyone involved in the attempt to take over Russia in 1999 continues to try and cover their collective posteriors posterities.
And it is Browder, along with Republic National Bank chief Edmond Safra, who were involved together in the pillaging of Russia in the 1990’s. Browder’s firm hired Magintsky as an accountant (because that’s what he was) to assist in the money laundering Heritage Capital was involved in.
The attempted take over of Russia failed because Yeltsin saw the setup which led him to appoint Putin as his Deputy Prime Minister.
Martin Armstrong talked about this receNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
ANTIFA on the use of violence
2017
Quote:Yeah. Combating violence with violence.
Anti-fascist activists, or “antifa,” increasingly mobilized in the wake of President Trump’s election, are unapologetic about what they describe as the necessary use of violence to combat authoritarianism.
Quote:
While both experts on the movement and activists within it emphasize that not everyone who participates in anti-fascist activism engages in violence, they say the use of force is intrinsic to their political philosophy.
“The justification [of the use of violence] is that Nazi ideology at its very core is founded on violence and on wielding power by any means,” said Mike Isaacson, one of the founders of Smash Racism D.C., an antifa organization in Washington.
Isaacson is unequivocal in his defense of violence as a legitimate tool to combat the creeping threat of what he deems authoritarianism ...
On Sunday, antifa protesters hurled glass bottles and bricks at police officers monitoring a far-right march in Portland, Ore.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/350524-antifa-activists-sa
y-violence-is-necessary
Quote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/08/28/black-cl
Black-clad antifa members attack peaceful right-wing demonstrators in Berkeley
ad-antifa-attack-right-wing-demonstrators-in-berkeley/?utm_term=.89d654d0a52d
Quote:In other words, ANTIFA wants to deny other groups free speech rights.
“There is the question of whether these people should feel safe organizing as Nazis in public, and I don’t think they should,” said Isaacson.
There's plenty more. And if you want to see a justification for "beating the fuck out of" people just look at SHINY"GOOD"GUY's post.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND
America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hey look over here says comrade sig . Ignore the fact that Trump just admitted his son and the others in the Trump Tower meeting conspired with the Russians.
Huge folks, this is huge. tick tock
T ![]()
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Signy,
The reason I didn't put global warming at the very top is because it's already here. We may or may not be able to do anything about it at this point. I think we should TRY, but I don't see any guarantees. As was pointed out to me a few years ago, the regime we're in is not able to be predicted by current models which are based on a steady state. We've already invoked feedback loops, not all of which we even know about, and none of which we truly understand. But MOST of them look to me to be positive feedbacks, leading to increasing warming.
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Here's my contribution:
America's biggest problem, humanity's biggest problem, and the world's biggest problem is nuclear war. We could end up at 'game over' in minutes. We need to solve that.
It's second biggest problem is nuclear power. We have two festering sores that will leak radiation to the end of human history unless we figure out what to do with them, and apparently, we don't care if we get more. Along with that, we haven't figured out what to do with the waste from any of the 460 existing power plants and 60 under construction. Not that this is all under our control, but the consequences visit us nevertheless.
I have others I would like to mention, but that'll have to be later.
THUGGER admits it's not about RUSSIA !!! and is, in fact, a witch hunt. "Trump better be innocent of any wrong doing, anywhere, anytime."
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
THUGR, you keep saying that I'm just "attacking America's democratic institutions" but ... what are YOU constantly "defending"?
War, and the destruction of other nations wherever and whenever our elite wants?
"Security state" apparatchiks?
The military?
Corporations?
The wealthy elite?
Universal surveillance?
"War with Russia", specifically?
MORE "War with Russia"?
MINDLESS "War with Russia"?
Son, there is NOTHING "democratic" in what you seem to have Velcroed yourself to. I suggest that you check your basic allegiances and make sure that you haven't accidentally stuck yourself to Hitler's Germany or Stalin's Russia.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND
America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The fallacy of relative privation sig is an informal fallacy by which one compares the subject under discussion to something else in an effort to “suggest that the opponent’s argument should be ignored.”
Trump turns states evidence against his son, son in law and all others attending the Trump Towers meeting with the Russians by admitting they were there to conspire with the Russians against the United States.
T ![]()
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:As opposed to ... say ... repeatedly defaming someone as a "Russian troll" to suggest that one's opponent's argument should be ignored?
The fallacy of relative privation sig is an informal fallacy by which one compares the subject under discussion to something else in an effort to “suggest that the opponent’s argument should be ignored.”
No, you don't get away with that stupid point. I have REPEATEDLY addressed your particular argument, asking you to BE SPECIFIC about what is wrong with contacting Russians, or having a foreign policy that attempts to reduce tensions with Russia to a more-normal simmer, instead of keeping the hysteria-pot at the boil. If anyone is "ignoring" your argument, it's YOU, because every time you're even questioned about it ... you run away.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND
America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
“There is the question of whether these people should feel safe organizing as Nazis in public, and I don’t think they should,” said Isaacson.
In other words, ANTIFA wants to deny other groups free speech rights.
Quote:
There's plenty more. And if you want to see a justification for "beating the fuck out of" people just look at SHINY"GOOD"GUY's post.
Yes, please take a look at my post, it's very illuminating.
I say, "kick them right in the balls, then ask questions."
It's rather ironic isn't it? Fighting fascism with fascism,
what a concept. They wouldn't last a second in my old neighborhood, too many VFWs. The Irish and the Italians would "beat the fuck" out of them, literally.
Well, it's coming to a head. So thank you Trump, you brought them
out of the woodwork. GO ANTIFA!
(one strange thing though. People have often called "liberals" a
bunch of wusses, and yet here we have a rather radical response on the level of Vikings and Norsemen. Really strange)
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
ANTIFA on the use of violence
2017Quote:Yeah. Combating violence with violence.
Anti-fascist activists, or “antifa,” increasingly mobilized in the wake of President Trump’s election, are unapologetic about what they describe as the necessary use of violence to combat authoritarianism.Quote:
While both experts on the movement and activists within it emphasize that not everyone who participates in anti-fascist activism engages in violence, they say the use of force is intrinsic to their political philosophy.
“The justification [of the use of violence] is that Nazi ideology at its very core is founded on violence and on wielding power by any means,” said Mike Isaacson, one of the founders of Smash Racism D.C., an antifa organization in Washington.
Isaacson is unequivocal in his defense of violence as a legitimate tool to combat the creeping threat of what he deems authoritarianism ...
On Sunday, antifa protesters hurled glass bottles and bricks at police officers monitoring a far-right march in Portland, Ore.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/350524-antifa-activists-sa
y-violence-is-necessaryQuote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/08/28/black-cl
Black-clad antifa members attack peaceful right-wing demonstrators in Berkeley
ad-antifa-attack-right-wing-demonstrators-in-berkeley/?utm_term=.89d654d0a52dQuote:In other words, ANTIFA wants to deny other groups free speech rights.
“There is the question of whether these people should feel safe organizing as Nazis in public, and I don’t think they should,” said Isaacson.
There's plenty more. And if you want to see a justification for "beating the fuck out of" people just look at SHINY"GOOD"GUY's post.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND
America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Nobody should be scared of Antifa. They're a bunch of mask wearing clowns who are afraid to show their faces while they're lighting garbage cans on fire. They're made up mostly of middle to upper class white college kids who are "saving the world". They want Socialism, even though they've gotten everything for free from their parents so far that wouldn't have been provided to them if we were living in a Socialist country. They're idiots, and they're pussies.
BAMN, on the other hand, isn't an organization I would want to get into a tussle with. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BAMN
By Any Means Necessary.
There are some truly scary people involved in that movement.
At any rate, my advice to anybody is the same as it ever has been. Don't put up any political signs on your yard and don't put political bumper stickers on your car and you've really got nothing to worry about. I can't even imagine why anybody in this current political climate would want to do so unless they wanted their homes or cars vandalized or they were looking for a fight.
Just remember... only a very small minority of people in the world are crazy. Most everybody you ever meet is going to be at least tolerable.
All the rioting I've ever seen on TV and to this day at nearly 40 years old I've never once witnessed anything close to even a small riot in my life.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There has been a great deal of hand-wringing and pearl-clutching lately over what it means that Trump flunkies who cage children are encountering some difficulty in ordering chalupas immediately thereafter.
“Civility,” they shout and cuss. Whatever happened to civility?
Civility (b.1776-d.2016). R.I.P. Civility was murdered by Donald Trump, who intends to spend the rest of his life seeking the real killer.
“Hypocracy”: rule of the hypocrites.
Here are some actual uncivil tweets by the actual #Presidunce of the formerly-United States:
Sen. Lindsey Graham: “I ran him out of the race like a little boy.” “dumb mouthpiece.”
CNN’s Jim Acosta: “crazy”
Former Trump advisor Sam Nunberg: “a drugged up/drunk loser.”
His UN Ambassador Nikki Haley: “the people of South Carolina are embarrassed by [her]”
House Speaker Paul Ryan: “very weak.”
CNN’s Ana Navarro: “[one] of the dumbest people in politics”
AP’s Jeff Horwitz: “wouldn’t know the truth if it hit him in the face.”
Ariana Huffington: “dummy” “liberal clown”
Sen. Bernie Sanders: “crazy” “SAD”
Fox News’s Brit Hume: “knows nothing” “a dope!”
AP’s Jill Colvin: her “stories are fictional garbage.”
Sen. Ben Sasse: “looks more like a gym rat than a U.S. Senator”
MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough: “clown” “Psycho Joe”
Actor Samuel L. Jackson: “don’t like [his] golf swing”
DNC Chair Donna Brazile: “chokes on the truth”
PBS’s Tavis Smiley: “hater & racist”
MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski: “dumb as a rock”
Fox News’s Megyn Kelly: “the most overrated person on TV”
We could go on, and on, and on. Honestly, we’ve just scratched the surface. But you get the point.
Trump delenda est
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME