Lynch. Comey. Dirty Debbie. Hillary. The FBI-DNC-DOJ link. Ohr. Stzok. Page. Rosenstein. It's one giant deep state clusterfvck

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Monday, September 29, 2025 15:08
VIEWED: 16657
PAGE 10 of 14

PREV PAGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NEXT PAGE

THGRRI

Monday, February 5, 2018 2:10 AM

Let's do it again
T

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, February 5, 2018 5:52 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
I want to point out that the traditional liberals/ affiliated with Democrats of yesteryear do not at all resemble the NEO-liberals/ affiliated with democrats today.

ETA: your characterizations and responses seem out of date, therefore, misdirected.

What do you consider the traditional?
The Conservative JFK?
Democrat Ronald Reagan?
Or the Pro-Slavery stalwart Democrats/Klansmen before them?

When do you consider the NEO faction to be?

AURAPTOR

Monday, February 5, 2018 5:59 AM

Quote:
One diplomat said that in order to quiet the concerns of the Europeans. And I quote "Republicans have explained it’s less about Russia and more about Congress sending a message to Trump, one western diplo said." One person rappy out of 419.

Diplomats aren't Congressmen. Not even PART of the 419. Dingus. Good grief, why do we let stupid people vote ?

AURAPTOR

Monday, February 5, 2018 6:03 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:

Hey rappy, so much for your logic on this. Trump was forced to do it and I was right. You basing your argument on one opinion saying it was just for show was stupid. Do you feel stupid?

He signed the bill, thus making your delusion that he's Putin's puppet disappear like a vapor in the wind.

You weren't right, by any stretch of the imagination.

I do feel stupid for trying to have a grown up dialogue w/ the likes of you.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, February 5, 2018 6:31 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
No, you need to think outside your tiny bubble. One answered and gave a response. That's not a serious assessment of ALL in the House. Not even remotely. ALL of them could think exactly like that, but if only 1 SAID it, that's ' one in 419 " ? Stupid logic. And your example doesn't even make any sense. The ' one ' out of 419 isn't even a member of Congress, so no, he's none of 419. Though who can say how many agree w/ his sentiment ? It's a meaningless red herring trail.

Go back to your own article. It clearly gives a valid reason why the President doesn't want to be beholden to Congress. This sort of squabble goes back to the 1700's , and even before.

This isn't Trump or Russia specific. Not even close.

Hard to slalom through T's nonsense.
Why should Trump sign the Bill? Cannot the House override, or would they need to wait for Trump to Veto?
Would it not be reasonable to wait until the witch-hunt is over, to provide the illusion of impartiality? Or was this all over before The Memo surfaced?

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, February 5, 2018 10:35 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Hard to slalom through T's nonsense.

Don't try it man! That's doomed to end about as well as a Sonny Bono ski trip.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

1KIKI

Monday, February 5, 2018 10:53 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
I want to point out that the traditional liberals/ affiliated with Democrats of yesteryear do not at all resemble the NEO-liberals/ affiliated with democrats today.

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
What do you consider the traditional?
The Conservative JFK?
Democrat Ronald Reagan?
Or the Pro-Slavery stalwart Democrats/Klansmen before them?

When do you consider the NEO faction to be?

The dems of my era stood for the little guy. They believed in fair chances for all, and a helping hand when needed. They stood for a US peacefully engaged with the rest of the world. NEO-liberals are about at related to liberals as socialists are to NATIONAL socialists. ie, almost exact opposites. NEO-liberals believe in the big military bootprint of their own self-righteousness all over the globe. We'll fix you, they say to themselves, with wolfish delight. NEO-liberals believe in social Darwinism, and the devil take the hindmost. They believe in international corporations, trade agreements, and the US and the EU above all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO YOU BY NOW THAT IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO LOGICAL FALLACIES AND TROLLING YOUR SO-CALLED ARGUMENTS ARE LIES?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, February 5, 2018 1:53 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
I want to point out that the traditional liberals/ affiliated with Democrats of yesteryear do not at all resemble the NEO-liberals/ affiliated with democrats today.

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
What do you consider the traditional?
The Conservative JFK?
Democrat Ronald Reagan?
Or the Pro-Slavery stalwart Democrats/Klansmen before them?

When do you consider the NEO faction to be?
The dems of my era stood for the little guy. They believed in fair chances for all, and a helping hand when needed. They stood for a US peacefully engaged with the rest of the world. NEO-liberals are about at related to liberals as socialists are to NATIONAL socialists. ie, almost exact opposites. NEO-liberals believe in the big military bootprint of their own self-righteousness all over the globe. We'll fix you, they say to themselves, with wolfish delight. NEO-liberals believe in social Darwinism, and the devil take the hindmost. They believe in international corporations, trade agreements, and the US and the EU above all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

Little guy, fair chances...so you are talking about before 1960. I didn't know you were old enough for that to be your era.
When I grew up, equal opportunity, helping those less fortunate were the hallmarks of Conservatives. Which, back then were Republican.

SIGNYM

Friday, February 9, 2018 3:40 AM

Another one bites the dust:

Quote:
Top DOJ Official Involved In Clinton And Russia Probes Steps Down

A senior Justice Department official who was involved in oversight of the Hillary Clinton email investigation as well as the Russian interference probe has stepped down, citing personal reasons.

mmm hmmm

Quote:
David Laufman, 59, was the DOJ's chief of the National Security Division's Counterintelligence and Export Control Section - working his way up the FBI ranks after beginning his career in 1980 as a CIA analyst. Laufman obtained a law degree from Georgetown University.

Exports. Like, uranium?

Quote:
... Journalist Mike Cernovich, who [sounds crazy like a lunatic but has broken several important stories,] broke the Susan Rice "unmasking" story, claimed that Laufman was the source of "several national security leaks" to the media.

Laufman is hardly the first official to leave the DOJ or FBI in recent months. Last week, former FBI Director James Comey's assistant, Josh Campbell, left the FBI in order to take a new position at CNN - Defending the FBI according to a flyer for a party thrown by the agency.

...In late January, James Comey's chief-of-staff resigned as well. Finally, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe also stepped down in late January, following what was reportedly a forced retirement according to Fox News.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876

SIGNYM

Monday, March 12, 2018 11:02 AM

Quote:
Clinton Charity Fraud Biggest Scandal in US History – Kevin Shipp

Former CIA Officer and whistleblower Kevin Shipp says the reason for all the crime and treason at the FBI and DOJ all boils down to one thing–the Clinton so-called “charity.” Shipp explains, “Hillary Clinton was running and is running a global financial criminal syndicate. She was using these secret servers to conduct Clinton financial money laundering business. The shocking thing about that is all the former directors of the CIA that have come out to support her, from Clapper to Brennan to Morell to Robert Gates supporting her being elected, knew about this criminal syndicate. Comey was protecting it. Lynch was protecting it. Weissmann was protecting it. And that is the big why. What’s she got on these people? Are they financial ties? They had to be aware of this, especially the counter-intelligence units. We know it was hacked into by foreign intelligence services because it was just hanging out there. Hillary Clinton was running a secret server outside the Department of State for the purposes of laundering money through the criminal Clinton Foundation.”

Are the crimes and treason of the Clinton Foundation the anvil that is about to drop? Shipp says, “It’s not just an anvil, I think it is a mountain and the nexus of everything. This “Clinton Global Initiative” (CGI) is worldwide, and it’s been out there for a couple of decades. It has now intertwined former Directors of the CIA and FBI. George Soros is a part of it. It’s connected to all kinds of global financial institutions. . . . It is at least a $100 billion. . . . All these people protecting and defending Hillary Clinton and knowing about her criminal syndicate, this goes into the so-called “Deep State” of our government, and it is connected, involved and intertwined in the global criminal crime syndicate called the Clinton Foundation. This is probably going to be the biggest scandal in U.S. history–once it’s busted. I think they are quietly working on it now, and I think they have been for the last year. It is so huge the arrests and indictments could cause a Constitutional crisis with some people being removed. Maybe that’s why they are moving slowly. It all comes back down to the Clinton Foundation and the criminal syndicate.”

Is former President Obama involved with the Clinton crime syndicate? Shipp says, “Yes, I am absolutely convinced of it. George Soros gave $30 million to Obama’s campaign. Then he gave $27.1 million to Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Both Obama and Clinton are tied directly into George Soros. Obama was put into office with millions of dollars that came out of nowhere. Yes, he’s part of this cabal. Yes, he’s part of this global syndicate, and in my opinion, the subversion of our government.”

In closing, Shipp contends, “There could be a Constitutional crisis in that we could see Congressmen, Senators, former Directors of the FBI and the CIA perp walked after they receive charges. Could you imagine if senior DOJ officials were arrested, some Congressmen and Senators were arrested and other government officials were arrested on charges and walked out of office? That’s the Constitutional crisis I am talking about. Those kind of high level arrests would shake up this nation. It would be huge, and that’s why it has taken so long and methodical in doing this.”

https://usawatchdog.com/clinton-charity-fraud-biggest-scandal-in-us-hi
story-kevin-shipp/

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876

PREV PAGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NEXT PAGE