Real World Event Discussions

Lynch. Comey. Dirty Debbie. Hillary. The FBI-DNC-DOJ link. Ohr. Stzok. Page. Rosenstein. It's one giant deep state clusterfvck

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Monday, September 29, 2025 15:08
VIEWED: 16657
PAGE 8 of 14

Saturday, February 3, 2018 8:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

FBI Chief FOIA Officer: "Every Single Memo Comey Leaked Was Classified"

As James Comey trots around the country on his book-selling tour, tweeting bible quotes and nature scenes, a less serene series of events is playing out in Washington D.C. which suggests the former FBI Director may be in trouble over the memos he leaked to Columbia law professor Daniel Richman, allegedly detailing conversations between Comey and President Trump.

While Richman told CNN "No memo was given to me that was marked 'classified,' and James Comey told Congressional investigators he tried to "write it in such a way that I don't include anything that would trigger a classification," it appears the FBI's chief FOIA officer disagrees.

While we previously reported that Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said four of the 7 Comey memos he reviewed were "marked classified" at the "Secret" or "Confidential" level - tonight we find out that every single Comey memo was classified at the time, per Judicial Watch director of investigations Chris Farrell - who has a signed declaration from the FBI's chief FOIA officer to that effect:

MORE AT https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-05/fbi-chief-foia-officer-every
-single-memo-comey-leaked-was-classified


Sounds like Comey belongs in jail.

This was posted 5 Jan. Another observation that Comey belongs in jail. The "Nunes" Memo was dated 18 Jan.

These crimes should be added to that Master List of all the crimes committed by these Libtard/Democrap goons.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, February 4, 2018 11:20 AM

I want to point out that the traditional liberals/ affiliated with Democrats of yesteryear do not at all resemble the NEO-liberals/ affiliated with democrats today.

ETA: your characterizations and responses seem out of date, therefore, misdirected.




HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO YOU BY NOW THAT IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO LOGICAL FALLACIES AND TROLLING YOUR SO-CALLED ARGUMENTS ARE LIES?

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, February 4, 2018 5:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
I want to point out that the traditional liberals/ affiliated with Democrats of yesteryear do not at all resemble the NEO-liberals/ affiliated with democrats today.

ETA: your characterizations and responses seem out of date, therefore, misdirected.



Strongly agree.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, February 4, 2018 6:36 PM

Liberals are not to be confused w/ the far LEFT, the violent Antifa types , radical extremists who have all but taken over the Democratic party.


Even I know that much.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, February 4, 2018 6:44 PM

@GreggJarrett
21h
21 hours ago

A 2nd source has now confirmed to me that, in a meeting on January 10, Deputy A-G Rosenstein used the power of his office to threaten to subpoena the calls & texts of the Intel Committee to get it to stop it’s investigation of DOJ and FBI. Likely an Abuse of Power & Obstruction.
Gregg Jarrett


For Hillary, and all her Deep State friends -




Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, February 4, 2018 7:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
SitRep: Congress Tells Trump They’re Watching Russia;


House vs. Moscow, and Trump in the middle. In a rare display of bipartisan comity, the House on Tuesday passed a measure that would slap new sanctions on Moscow. The package, which sailed through 419 to 3 despite objections from both the White House and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, targets specific Russian officials in retaliation for that country’s interference in the 2016 presidential election, and adds penalties against Iran and North Korea.

The bit the White House most objects to requires the president to obtain congressional approval before relaxing any sanctions against Moscow.

http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/07/26/sitrep-congress-tells-trump-theyre
-watching-russia-pence-wades-into-pentagon-transgender-fight
/




So what happened next. Trump refused to sign the fucking bill. And yet there are those here that still post Trump is being railroaded over this Putin thing.

Where's the outrage from the right. Our self proclaimed country loving right? Come on rappy, JSF, Jack, lets hear the outrage. Sig, 1kiki, what nothing to say.

The bill passed 419 to 3. Why aren't the Republicans balking? Complaining to Trump to sign the bill. Boy it didn't take them long to lose their backbones did it? It didn't take the right long to sell this country down the river.

Why aren't the democrats making more noise. Distracted by the, adds up to nothing memo I guess. America first my ass. Trump is Putin's puppet and he needs to go.

Instead you morons discuss the need to dismantle the FBI. You're all for destroying the rule of law in this country. Of course after you try and distort it to put Hillary in jail. Talk about dipshits.

T

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, February 4, 2018 7:21 PM

This is far more a power play by 2 branches with each other than anything else. Those not well versed in DC politics will often misread cause -effects of what goes on there, and insert totally non-related purpose.

" The bit the White House most objects to requires the president to obtain congressional approval before relaxing any sanctions against Moscow. "


It's far more complex than merely " 419 - 3 ".

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, February 4, 2018 7:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
This is far more a power play by 2 branches with each other than anything else. Those not well versed in DC politics will often misread cause -effects of what goes on there, and insert totally non-related purpose.

" The bit the White House most objects to requires the president to obtain congressional approval before relaxing any sanctions against Moscow. "


It's far more complex than merely " 419 - 3 ".




Funny how things are far more complicated when it what you want. They passed the bill. Or is it just another bill passed by the right, to appease the right that they never intended to deliver on?

The republicans control all three branches of government. Yet, no oversight into how to stop Russia from interfering in our elections. Hacking into our businesses and stealing our technologies.

No, instead the republicans are engaged in treasonous behavior just to get another conservative judge and more tax breaks for the rich. There's your complicated.

Your dismissal of this as politics as usual is sad.



T

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, February 4, 2018 7:31 PM

Read your own linked article. It gives very valid reason why any President would not sign on to such a bill, regardless of how his own party voted.

Think outside your bubble, if that's possible.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, February 4, 2018 8:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Read your own linked article. It gives very valid reason why any President would not sign on to such a bill, regardless of how his own party voted.

Think outside your bubble, if that's possible.



One diplomat said that in order to quiet the concerns of the Europeans. And I quote "Republicans have explained it’s less about Russia and more about Congress sending a message to Trump, one western diplo said." One person rappy out of 419. You need to learn to read comprehensively. One person who had no involvement in creating or voting on the bill offering his/her opinion; meaningless.

Realize as well that diplomats say one thing and Trump always says something else. His message always differs from theirs. Example, Rex Tillerson.

And lets not forget the message sent back to all those who worked on and voted for the bill, by Trumps refusal to sign it. Sorry boys and girls, but you know with me it's Russia first.

No rappy, they need to grow a backbone and put America first. They need to sign the bill. And the democrats need to wake up and realize what just happened. They need to move on from debating the, nothing to see here memo.

It's you rappy that needs to think outside your partisan box.


T

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME