Countdown Clock to Trumps impeachment " STARTS"
POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Monday, April 14, 2025 23:28
VIEWED: 485499
PAGE 52 of 404
Quote:Speaking of dishonest: Trump's adviser, Carter Page’s bizarre testimony to the House Intelligence Committee, explained. He testified for more than six hours on the Russia scandal. It was weird.
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Yes, it's especially handy when dealing with people who are dishonest.
www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/7/16616912/carter-page-testimo
ny-trump-russia
Page has been talking nonstop about the scandal in the press, always proclaiming his total innocence. Page frequently filibusters, goes on tangents, and works himself into a state of high dudgeon. But when he’s asked to explain how what he’s saying now fits with the actual emails he wrote at the time, things get awkward. Pressed on inconsistencies, Page struggled to explain them.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
( Carter Paje testimony video )
With Trump sumhow connected to the big Saudi Arabia nyooz my consern that its much bigger and stinkyer that just TrumPutin iz growing.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:I was recalling that some sites include the date time of the original post being quoted. Very handy.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:At least you can separate out who said what when they reply above the quoted context, but I do get your point. I'm guilty of that myself at times. It's just that many times the quoted posts are just to long. If the response is at the top you can go to the quoted part being referred to instead of constantly having to read the entire post.
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:It is a bit chilly out, and we had snow on Saturday, but is Hell freezing over?
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:You think you are arguing against me. Instead you are arguing against the proper etiquette of quoting someone dummy. This is why people get an education. What kiki did is wrong. You don't quote someone and not inform the reader who it is you are quoting. Some here do it all the time.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Jeez T.
Just because the website has a system for quoting people doesn't mean that supersedes the long established English language.
I'd think twice about calling somebody else a dummy when you are exhibiting dummy behavior yourself in the argument.
I've seen SIG put things in quotes here and then argue against what she quoted. Funny thing is, she made up these quoted statements herself. She did this so she could pretend to make someone look stupid and herself superior.
People here do all kinds of things to confuse or make their point. They do it for many different reasons. They also intentionally misquote people here all the time. They argue points based on false and twisted concepts of anothers' post as well. Only your friends do that Jack. I'm talking about kiki, SIG and their sock puppets.
You'll argue anything without thinking it through won't you? It's what makes you someone to be ignored.
This is really hard to admit, but T has a point, several of them.
The rampant lack of attribution and unclear quotes gets quite confusing. Not to mention some posters replying BEFORE the quote they are REPLYING to. Like reversing chronological sequence.
When you look at kiki's posts many many times they are a confusing mess. And much of the time SIGs' are made up or misquoted. If they won't clarify who they've quoted and quote them properly and accurately then the post should be dismissed as bogus.
Now, back to the countdown clock and news of the day shall we.
Yes, it's especially handy when dealing with people who are dishonest.
LOL... yeah. You mean like the few times I have caught you doing that red handed by quoting your posts and then calling you out later when you changed the post after the fact.
And seriously dude. If you absolutely must use the pink font. Please do everybody a favor and put an end bracket on that shit so everybody quoting you doesn't have to take the extra step of removing your color.
I'm not sure if you're actually aware of the inconvenience you pose for everybody with that.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Duznt bug me.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
You rarely ever quote him. Every time you do you have to edit your post to get rid of the pink on your own words.
I normally wouldn't point it out, in fact I've dealt with it for months now, but T goes out of his way to slam other people about their own posting etiquette.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:And Six's point is as valid as T's. And T is not the sole perpetrator.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
You rarely ever quote him. Every time you do you have to edit your post to get rid of the pink on your own words.
I normally wouldn't point it out, in fact I've dealt with it for months now, but T goes out of his way to slam other people about their own posting etiquette.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Naw, mostly because I find the progressively inward- and backward-going indents to be awkward, and it's just too time consuming to erase all the extraneous stuff when I only want a sentence or two. Hence, quotation marks.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
That being said, maybe the reason that Kiki didn't use the system quote there is because it wasn't actually Second that said that either.
HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO YOU BY NOW THAT IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO LOGICAL FALLACIES AND TROLLING YOUR SO-CALLED ARGUMENTS ARE LIES?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"You don't quote someone and not inform the reader who it is you are quoting. Some here do it all the time.'
Why not? I'm responding TO YOU. You know what you posted. And you don't need me to tell you who you are. Do you?
And anyone else can see the point I'm addressing BECAUSE I QUOTE IT, and also my subsequent response to that point. Who I'm responding to doesn't change the discussion. Unless of course what you think about something depends on who's saying it. In which case, you're awfully weak-minded.
As for sockpuppets, neither I nor signy has ever had them. But you are bound and determined to find them even when they don't exist.
I'm curious who you think is my sockpuppet(s). I can't imagine anyone that could even remotely be attached to me, especially now that this place is a ghost town, and most of the dregs who are still here have been here forever, with their own unique and individual voices.
Except you of course. You're DT.
HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO YOU BY NOW THAT IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO LOGICAL FALLACIES AND TROLLING YOUR SO-CALLED ARGUMENTS ARE LIES?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I've been accused by T of being a sock puppet of you or Signy before.
Funny how that's never been the other way around though...
I guess I'm just too stupid to have a sockpuppet of my own.
Oh... wait.
If I'm your sock puppet Kiki, that means that you are stupid too.
I'm confused.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
