Lynch. Comey. Dirty Debbie. Hillary. The FBI-DNC-DOJ link. Ohr. Stzok. Page. Rosenstein. It's one giant deep state clusterfvck
POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Monday, September 29, 2025 15:08
VIEWED: 16657
PAGE 5 of 14
Quote:LINKS PLEASE.
While we are learning more of the details regarding this, and learning more on just how fucked up the demarcates are, it's not new. We saw reporting on this in real time. -THUGR
Now, you should be asking yourself WHY the DNC was so committed to subverting the popular will and crowning Hillary.
Clearly, this is a demonstration of how the moneyed elites (i.e. our own homegrown oligarchy) buys elections. If you want to know WHOSE interests Shillary was representing, just look at - not only who paid her outrageous speakers fees (big pharma paid more than the banks) but also
who donated to her campaign (Soros, international tax evasion firms, corporate media) who donated to the DNC which was under Shillary's control (unknown) AND
who donated to the Clinton Foundation (the Saudis were big donors, Russians were in the mix, and the Foundation folded when Shillary lost the election, which should tell you something).
NOBODY in DC is clean. Just to give you an example of how widespread this is, Elizabeth Warren was begging for donations for Maggie Hassan for Senate. Well, I looked up Maggie's record, and it turns out that she has a soft spot in her heart for fraudulent bankers who participated in the subprime scam/ bubble, by appointing their front-man, Jerry Little, as her banking commissioner. (I looked up her stand on banks, the Federal deficit, minimum wage and a number of other issues, as I did for other progressive-looking highly advertised Dem candidates like Kamala Harris, Tammy Duckworth, and Patty Murray and found that, for the most part, they were wobbly on issues that were important to me and not worthy of my support.)
I guess this really belongs in "draining the swamp" but for years I've refused to donate to committees like the DNC and the DCCC, or to organizations like Emily's List because I have no control over where the money is going. When I DO give, it's to individual candidates, and only those that I feel represent my interests.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:LINKS PLEASE.
While we are learning more of the details regarding this, and learning more on just how fucked up the demarcates are, it's not new. We saw reporting on this in real time. -THUGR
Holly shit stupid. Is there anyone else here who remembers discussing how the election was rigged against Bernie Sanders in real time. Or how Wassermann was helping Clinton do just that? If so chime in please. SIG, I used to say you were dumber than a box of rocks. Now I see that was an understatement. Shit, you probably started your own links about this crying foul.
Do you want to deny that now ? Links, all in caps says you. Two words SIG, STUPID and DISHONEST says I.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There were allegations that some state primary votes were rigged.
THIS is about the written agreement between the Hillary campaign and the DNC, which basically gave her control of the DNC in exchange for fundraising. That means that more than a few state primary votes might have been rigged, it involves the transfer of monies from state resources to Hillary, mailers, polling, get-out-the-vote campaigns, and all of the resources of the party central committee were at Hillary's disposal.
This isn't allegation, this is evidence which- if followed up- will reveal the whole scope of the Hillary campaign rigging.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
There were allegations that some state primary votes were rigged.
THIS is about the written agreement between the Hillary campaign and the DNC, which basically gave her control of the DNC in exchange for fundraising. That means that more than a few state primary votes might have been rigged, it involves the transfer of monies from state resources to Hillary, mailers, polling, get-out-the-vote campaigns, and all of the resources of the party central committee were at Hillary's disposal.
This isn't allegation, this is evidence which- if followed up- will reveal the whole scope of the Hillary campaign rigging.
Apparently you didn't understand what was happening in real time. I guess you thought it would be good to post about the primary rigging to distract from all the negative news that was being printed about your guy, Trump.
I on the other hand understood in real time what that meant. Some of the details may have eluded me but rigged says it all. I also hated Hillary as a candidate in real time. However the choice between her and Trump was demonstrable in that Trump as President would be disastrous.
Now, to the bigger point dummy. Sanders was not a democrat. He was an independent and the democratic party owed him nothing. He attempted to hijack the democratic parties nomination process for personal gain. At the time his could not get nominated to anything on a national scale as an independent. Right or wrong, Clinton an actual democrat, blocked him from doing so. Maybe he should have tried running as a Republican.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The facts so far support that Debbie Downer was a bad DNC chairperson who ran the party into the red. Enter Crooked Hillary, who filled the party coffers at the cost of rigging the party process to shoehorn herself in as the anointed nominee.
And how did THAT work out?
HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO YOU BY NOW THAT IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO LOGICAL FALLACIES AND TROLLING YOUR SO-CALLED ARGUMENTS ARE LIES?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Ha! You kill me!
Great limerick!
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by Riverlove:
There once was a gal named Loretta
And to her boss Barack she swore no vendetta
"I'll also not charge your Sec. of State
But I will make Bill wait
On the tarmac so late
'Cause the prick thinks he's a mo' betta jet-setta!"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Before I called Bernie Sanders, I lit a candle in my living room and put on some gospel music. I wanted to center myself for what I knew would be an emotional phone call.
Second funniest thing I ever heard...set to a string quartet movement by Schubert.
Quote:
I had promised Bernie when I took the helm of the Democratic National Committee after the convention that I would get to the bottom of whether Hillary Clinton’s team had rigged the nomination process, as a cache of emails stolen by Russian hackers and posted online had suggested.
Sounds like "collusion" to me.....Ha!
Quote:
I’d had my suspicions from the moment I walked in the door of the DNC a month or so earlier, based on the leaked emails. But who knew if some of them might have been forged? I needed to have solid proof, and so did Bernie.
So I wrote a book about it; like to hear it? Here it goes.....straight out of In Living Color. You just can't make this stuff up.
The hairs on the back of my neck stood up and asked: Why now? Why not bring this to somebody before now? I think I know the answer, but I really don't give a shit.
Now, is Brazile available for Armed Services duty, because she can really throw a grenade.
SGG
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Billy-goat was a MUCH better sociopath than Hillary. In his prime you never even caught a whiff of the rot inside. Hillary otoh always seemed to leak it around the edges.
I also hated Hillary as a candidate in real time. However the choice between her and Trump was demonstrable in that Trump as President would be disastrous.
'She may be corrupt and a creep, and she's happy to give your jobs away, but at least she's not Donald' is not a spectacularly good campaign slogan.
But it would have been far better than pretending she was Saint Hillary and never did nuthin' wrong, like a lot of people did. Because that approach was so OBVIOUSLY disingenuous, not only did it not score points for Hillary, it shredded the credibility of anybody who was flogging it.
HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO YOU BY NOW THAT IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO LOGICAL FALLACIES AND TROLLING YOUR SO-CALLED ARGUMENTS ARE LIES?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Back to Dirty Debbie again. Not in her role as an election "fixer" but in her role as a possible traitor and massive security risk:
Quote:MORE AT http://ibankcoin.com/zeropointnow/2017/11/30/awan-case-dnc-lawyer-scra
AWAN CASE: DNC Lawyer Scrambling To Block Evidence From Hidden Laptop Tied To Wasserman Schultz
A lawyer for former DNC IT staffer Imran Awan is scrambling to block evidence found on a hidden laptop which may contain proof of a massive spy ring operating at the highest levels of Congress, in what may be the largest breach of National Security in U.S. history.
Awan, a Pakistani national, worked for dozens of Democratic members of Congress along with his wife, two brothers and a friend. Following the publication of DNC emails by WikiLeaks in the lead-up to the 2016 election, Congressional investigators discovered that the Awans had a secret server being housed by the House Democratic Caucus backed up to an offsite Dropbox account.
“For members to say their data was not compromised is simply inaccurate. They had access to all the data including all emails. Imran Awan is the walking example of an insider threat, a criminal actor who had access to everything,” –Daily Caller
According to a briefing, “all five of the shared employees system administrators collectively logged onto the [House Democratic] Caucus system 5,735 times, or an average of 27 times per day,” despite only one of them being authorized to do so.
The Awans were banned from the House IT network on February 2, 2017 after being named in a criminal investigation – however they continued to work in the building for Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz until Imran Awan’s arrest at Dulles Airport trying to flee the country in late July. Awan and his wife, Hina Alvi, were charged with conspiracy and bank fraud in relation to a real estate transaction.
The laptop in question was tucked away in a tiny room formerly used as a phone booth on the second floor of the Rayburn House Office Building late one night in March, only to be found by Capitol Police just after midnight on April 6, 2017 along with notebooks marked ‘attorney client privilege,’ letters addressed to the US Attorney of DC regarding Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and several forms of identification. Based on the contents of the backpack, some believe Awan wanted the laptop to be found.
mbling-to-block-evidence-from-hidden-laptop-tied-to-wasserman-schultz/
ORIGINALLY SEE AT http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-30/dnc-lawyer-scrambles-block-ev
idence-hidden-laptop-tied-wasserman-schultz
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I am referencing this thread, http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=62024, because SIG more times than not, sources her information that she posts here from zerohedge. She stupidly defends this as a reputable source. Something she does with other unreliable sources. As she continues to do so, I will reference this thread to remind all she posts from this and other corrupted sources. Sources designed to create havoc rather than inform.
Below are the names of those behind zero hedge. Don't miss what I've highlighted in red below. This folks is why comrade troll SIG loves to quote zero hedge.
In addition, Lokey said he faced constant pressure to frame stories in-line with a particular world-view, which he described as “Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent leader. John Kerry=dunce. Vladmir Putin=greatest leader in the history of statecraft.”
All of this matches SIG's playbook here and Putin's globally; exactly.
The men behind zero hedge
Colin Lokey, a 32-year-old former Seeking Alpha director
Daniel Ivandjiiski, a 37-year-old Bulgarian-born former hedge fund employee who was barred for insider trading in 2008
Tim Backshall, a 45-year-old credit derivatives strategist
Despite its populist tone, Lokey told Bloomberg he recently left Zero Hedge because he didn’t see eye-to-eye with the others when it came to editorial vision.
“Zero Hedge ceased to serve that public service years ago,” Lokey said. “They care what generates page views. Clicks. Money.”
In addition, Lokey said he faced constant pressure to frame stories in-line with a particular world-view, which he described as “Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent leader. John Kerry=dunce. Vladmir Putin=greatest leader in the history of statecraft.”
Lokey claims Zero Hedge’s focus on traffic and revenue is hypocritical, but Ivandjiiski sees things differently.
Finally, Zero Hedge addressed the accusations of systematic bias in its content.
“We are certainly ok with being the object of other’s conspiracy theories, in this case completely false ones since we have never been in contact with anyone in Russia, or the US, or any government for that matter,” Zero Hedge says.
The site claims it has never accepted a dime of funding outside of advertising revenue and that Lokey was never pressured about how to frame his articles or editorialized.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/zero-hedge-unmasked-theres-more-1427301
65.html
According to the Bloomberg article, three men have been churning out all of the content at Zero Hedge, using the joint pseudonym “Tyler Durden” from the Brad Pitt film “Fight Club.” The 1999 cult film, according to Rolling Stone, is “about being young, male and powerless against the pacifying drug of consumerism. It’s about solitude, despair and bottled-up rage.” That ethos is frequently on display at Zero Hedge.
The three “Tyler Durdens” outed by Bloomberg reporters are Colin Lokey, who has now left Zero Hedge in a fit of pique and is responsible for handing over the internal chat sessions from Zero Hedge on traffic-building strategies and other matters. Bloomberg says “the other two men are Daniel Ivandjiiski, 37, the Bulgarian-born former analyst long reputed to be behind the site, and Tim Backshall, 45, a well-known credit derivatives strategist.”
The article notes that “Ivandjiiski has a multimillion-dollar mansion in Mahwah, N.J., and Backshall lives in a plush San Francisco suburb,” suggesting these are “not exactly reflections” of the anti-capitalism reflected in the moniker “Tyler Durden.”
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME