Brade Runner II
POSTED BY: piratenews
UPDATED: Saturday, October 7, 2017 08:39
VIEWED: 8292
PAGE 2 of 2
Quote:Why confusing?
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Yes, I DID see Arrival. Although confusing , I generally liked it. Kinda on the same level as Interstellar, but not quite as mind blowing.
( I'd like to be proven wrong, but I'm more of a SETI guy, and think any contact we make with intelligent life " out there " will be of a species that has long since gone extinct. )
I'd love to hear your take on the discussion thread.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Why confusing?
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Yes, I DID see Arrival. Although confusing , I generally liked it. Kinda on the same level as Interstellar, but not quite as mind blowing.
( I'd like to be proven wrong, but I'm more of a SETI guy, and think any contact we make with intelligent life " out there " will be of a species that has long since gone extinct. )
I'd love to hear your take on the discussion thread.
Wasn't there some type of dimensional / time loop sort of twist to the movie ? Might have to rewatch , but it seemed a tad hinky to me. That's all. Not in a bad way, of course.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:That was integral to the beauty of the story. Since you've already seen it, check out our discussion thread, see if anything resonates.
Originally posted by AURaptor:Quote:Wasn't there some type of dimensional / time loop sort of twist to the movie ? Might have to rewatch , but it seemed a tad hinky to me. That's all. Not in a bad way, of course.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Why confusing?
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Yes, I DID see Arrival. Although confusing , I generally liked it. Kinda on the same level as Interstellar, but not quite as mind blowing.
( I'd like to be proven wrong, but I'm more of a SETI guy, and think any contact we make with intelligent life " out there " will be of a species that has long since gone extinct. )
I'd love to hear your take on the discussion thread.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hang on to your hats...I just read an article by Joshua Rothkopf, and he gave it 4 out of 5 Stars. He says it is worthy of praise and captures the essence of the original without being repressively derivative.
Oh, I'm getting goosebumps......like Christmas morning.
SGG
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I think you'll like BR2049. It's not a reboot.
Originally posted by AURaptor:Quote:Funny, that 5 1/2 years after this thread was started, we're just now seeing trailers.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Another thread implied Deckard was human. Was that ever established in any version of the first installment?
I hope the anticipation doesn't fall flat. I liked the original, but wasn't crazy about it. I respect what it was, and also what it wasn't. I hope that what set it apart is more in line with what carries over to the sequel, but it's so rare such things happen.
Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull comes to mind. ( sorry, it was just painful to watch )
So many overt clues seem to suggest that he's also a replicant, which I think doesn't make for as good a story.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME