Real World Event Discussions

Jared Kushner Used Private Email

POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Tuesday, September 1, 2026 03:19
VIEWED: 18830
PAGE 3 of 14

Wednesday, September 27, 2017 4:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Wishimay:
Apparently, Ivanka has been doing it too.

One email or 1000, a leak is a leak.

The truth is they ALL do it, and just think they won't get caught.

Why we haven't put security people in charge of this shit from day one is DISGRACEFUL.

Ivanka has been using WHITE HOUSE email account to conduct WHITE HOUSE business, for the WHITE HOUSE?
When will it end?
Does that mean a White House email leaked to the White House?

We need a Music Composition graduate to clamp down on security, for sure. Or Monica's Ex-Boyfriend's Estranged Wife.


Tally for people who can read: reeled in a second one.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, September 27, 2017 4:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Yes, agreed...IT IS A NOTHING BURGER! Powell did it, so did Condi Rice.
The legality of this situation was brought up and questioned by Trump, who, in his own loveable way, exaggerated the seriousness of the emails Hillary communicated with.

In other words, it was he who put the legality of the practice in the forefront. And now, ironically so, his family are doing exactly the same thing. What hypocrites! And in case you or any of our illustrious RWED members care to persist on Hillary's guilt in the matter; remember the FBI investigated and found nothing illegal in the thousands of emails. Otherwise she would be locked up; as would Jared and company, if ever it was found to have been handled in an illegal manner. Also, all it takes is one illegal or mishandled email to be charged, convicted and locked up.

Now think carefully before you respond.
Quote:

Here's the full statement from Kushner's attorney, Abbe Lowell:
"Mr. Kushner uses his White House email address to conduct White House business. Fewer than a hundred emails from January through August were either sent to or returned by Mr. Kushner to colleagues in the White House from his personal email account. These usually forwarded news articles or political commentary and most often occurred when someone initiated the exchange by sending an email to his personal, rather than his White House, address. All non-personal emails were forwarded to his official address and all have been preserved in any event."

SGG
Quote:

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I don't know, or waste my time perusing Fake News NPR. I just quoted the OP, otherwise he would change the content of the post and claim he didn't.

Maybe NPR was again fishing for gullible imbiciles, and reeled another one in.

It is curious.

I can't imagine that the article didn't say that. How do you butcher a simple cut and paste job unless you were doing it intentionally?

That would mean the "biggest point" of the article the OP posted either a big nothing burger or a typo. Either way, somebody just got punkd.


Reeled in a third.
Incapable of thinking or reading before responding.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, September 27, 2017 5:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Incapable of thinking or reading before responding.



No, you really can't.


WASHINGTON — At least six of President Trump’s closest advisers occasionally used private email addresses to discuss White House matters, current and former officials said on Monday.

The disclosures came a day after news surfaced that Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and adviser, used a private email account to send or receive about 100 work-related emails during the administration’s first seven months. But Mr. Kushner was not alone. Stephen K. Bannon, the former chief White House strategist, and Reince Priebus, the former chief of staff, also occasionally used private email addresses. Other advisers, including Gary D. Cohn and Stephen Miller, sent or received at least a few emails on personal accounts, officials said.

**********************************************************************
Ivanka Trump, the president’s elder daughter, who is married to Mr. Kushner, used a private account when she acted as an unpaid adviser in the first months of the administration, Newsweek reported Monday. Administration officials acknowledged that she also occasionally did so when she formally became a White House adviser. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter with reporters.

**********************************************************************


Officials are supposed to use government emails for their official duties so their conversations are available to the public and those conducting oversight. But it is not illegal for White House officials to use private email accounts as long as they forward work-related messages to their work accounts so they can be preserved.



https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/25/us/politics/private-email-trump-kus
hner-bannon.html

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, September 27, 2017 6:25 AM

The point goes above Wishes head for a 3rd time.

That wasn't the original story posted, or what the original story said.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, September 27, 2017 8:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
The point goes above Wishes head for a 3rd time.

That wasn't the original story posted, or what the original story said.



"PRIVATE ACCOUNT" does not mean "WHITE HOUSE ACCOUNT"!

Not that it matters, SHE HAS NO BUSINESS ADVISING ANYONE IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

But Trump needs someone to keep his Sundowner's in check. Lucky her.

I don't care what the original story says. The point is they all use unauthorized e-mail addresses, that is MY POINT.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, September 27, 2017 8:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Wishimay:
Apparently, Ivanka has been doing it too.

One email or 1000, a leak is a leak.

The truth is they ALL do it, and just think they won't get caught.

Why we haven't put security people in charge of this shit from day one is DISGRACEFUL.




Not, a leak is NOT a leak, kitten. And no, they don't ALL do it.

How many top secret / classified docs were hacked or even in those emails of Jared or Ivanka ?

ZERO

Compare that to the 1000's of top secret docs and names on Hillary's, whose SERVER was hacked.. good grief, if you really need to have this explained to you all over again, then there's no point.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, September 27, 2017 11:03 AM

Here's the thing, genius.

Hillary was in/around the White House for 8 years, Jared and Ivanka have been around it less than a year. The only reason they are doing something about it now, is BECAUSE of Hillary. If they had not gone through it with Hillary, how many e-mails do you think they would have found????

They all do it and now they DEFINITELY KNOW THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE. There is NO EXCUSE for the stupidity NOW.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, September 27, 2017 12:31 PM

Agreed...it has been going on for years, but is only now an issue because of the campaign and Trump's pathetic accusations. Now the shoe's on the other foot and the issue is being pressed by the Democrats, especially after all that noise he made.

So, if it's a NOTHING BURGER for Trump, then it is so for Hillary.


SGG


Quote:

Originally posted by Wishimay:
Here's the thing, genius.

Hillary was in/around the White House for 8 years, Jared and Ivanka have been around it less than a year. The only reason they are doing something about it now, is BECAUSE of Hillary. If they had not gone through it with Hillary, how many e-mails do you think they would have found????

They all do it and now they DEFINITELY KNOW THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE. There is NO EXCUSE for the stupidity NOW.


NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, September 27, 2017 12:38 PM

Hey Rap......was anyone arrested?


SGG


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Wishimay:
Apparently, Ivanka has been doing it too.

One email or 1000, a leak is a leak.

The truth is they ALL do it, and just think they won't get caught.

Why we haven't put security people in charge of this shit from day one is DISGRACEFUL.




Not, a leak is NOT a leak, kitten. And no, they don't ALL do it.

How many top secret / classified docs were hacked or even in those emails of Jared or Ivanka ?

ZERO

Compare that to the 1000's of top secret docs and names on Hillary's, whose SERVER was hacked.. good grief, if you really need to have this explained to you all over again, then there's no point.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, September 27, 2017 12:49 PM

First, I was agreeing with you guys!

So, let's see, exactly where did I misunderstand:

Quote:

The quote the OP put in the article was that he used a White House email address to conduct White House business.


Then his attorney went on to say:

Quote:

Fewer than a hundred emails from January through August were either sent to or returned by Mr. Kushner to colleagues in the White House from his personal email account.


"...his personal email account"

Then:

Quote:

when someone initiated the exchange by sending an email to his personal, rather than his White House, address.


But apparently he complied with government rules by:

Quote:

emails were forwarded to his official address and all have been preserved in any event."


So he did use a personal email address for government business. Now, once Mueller concludes his investigation, we will find out if any laws were broken. If no laws were broken, he'll walk around as free as Hillary.


SGG

Quote:

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
Quote:

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Yes, agreed...IT IS A NOTHING BURGER! Powell did it, so did Condi Rice.
The legality of this situation was brought up and questioned by Trump, who, in his own loveable way, exaggerated the seriousness of the emails Hillary communicated with.

In other words, it was he who put the legality of the practice in the forefront. And now, ironically so, his family are doing exactly the same thing. What hypocrites! And in case you or any of our illustrious RWED members care to persist on Hillary's guilt in the matter; remember the FBI investigated and found nothing illegal in the thousands of emails. Otherwise she would be locked up; as would Jared and company, if ever it was found to have been handled in an illegal manner. Also, all it takes is one illegal or mishandled email to be charged, convicted and locked up.

Now think carefully before you respond.



You misunderstand, SGG.

The quote the OP put in the article was that he used a White House email address to conduct White House business.

If that's the case... I don't see what the issue is.


I don't think anybody in any government position should be using their work email addresses to conduct personal business. It just goes to show the hubris of these people that work in the public sector.

There was no way in hell that I was going to use the company email to send personal messages at my last good job. It was a well known fact that all emails sent within the company were subject to monitoring and that some people had been fired simply for sending "inappropriate" things. One of the managers had been fired while I worked there for sending one of these things to a female co-worker. They were friends. She didn't go to anybody and complain, and actually she was really messed up about it when he was fired. It was probably some random check that was done on emails that got him... or maybe somebody had it out for him for some reason...


I agree that anybody using their work emails in any public sector position for personal use should be punished.


Hillary did a lot more than that though. Assuming that all was done here was sending a personal email with the work account, trying to equate one to the other is not a valid argument.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME