Jared Kushner Used Private Email

POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Tuesday, September 1, 2026 03:19
VIEWED: 18830
PAGE 2 of 14

So true, agree 1000%

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Yes, agreed...IT IS A NOTHING BURGER! Powell did it, so did Condi Rice.
The legality of this situation was brought up and questioned by Trump, who, in his own loveable way, exaggerated the seriousness of the emails Hillary communicated with.

In other words, it was he who put the legality of the practice in the forefront. And now, ironically so, his family are doing exactly the same thing. What hypocrites! And in case you or any of our illustrious RWED members care to persist on Hillary's guilt in the matter; remember the FBI investigated and found nothing illegal in the thousands of emails. Otherwise she would be locked up; as would Jared and company, if ever it was found to have been handled in an illegal manner. Also, all it takes is one illegal or mishandled email to be charged, convicted and locked up.

Now think carefully before you respond.

Quote:

---

Here's the full statement from Kushner's attorney, Abbe Lowell:

"Mr. Kushner uses his White House email address to conduct White House business. Fewer than a hundred emails from January through August were either sent to or returned by Mr. Kushner to colleagues in the White House from his personal email account. These usually forwarded news articles or political commentary and most often occurred when someone initiated the exchange by sending an email to his personal, rather than his White House, address. All non-personal emails were forwarded to his official address and all have been preserved in any event."

---

SGG

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I don't know, or waste my time perusing Fake News NPR. I just quoted the OP, otherwise he would change the content of the post and claim he didn't.

Maybe NPR was again fishing for gullible imbiciles, and reeled another one in.

---

It is curious.

I can't imagine that the article didn't say that. How do you butcher a simple cut and paste job unless you were doing it intentionally?


That would mean the "biggest point" of the article the OP posted either a big nothing burger or a typo. Either way, somebody just got punkd.

---

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

[...all it takes is one illegal or mishandled email to be charged, convicted and locked up.

---

It's like being a "little" pregnant.


SGG

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Non issue.
Fewer than 100 e-mails in total.
Not like the 10's of 1000's that Hillary destroyed.
Not a " personal server ", but merely 1 account.

And he's certainly not the head of a Cabinet level positon, while trading pay-for-play favors with heads of state or large international corporations.

Like Hillary.

---

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

...to conduct illegal Secretary of State cash transactions, right? That would be different.

---

Yeah, she gets away with murder that woman. It reminds me of an old James Cagney flick - Never Steal Anything Small, 1959. Imagine, all those millions and never ever getting caught. Cagney would be proud.

You gotta admit, the woman is a proverbial "Bonnie," and all done without a single shot fired. Now that's how you steal millions fellow travelers. Untraceable, unmarked bills.


SGG

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Yes, agreed...IT IS A NOTHING BURGER! Powell did it, so did Condi Rice.
The legality of this situation was brought up and questioned by Trump, who, in his own loveable way, exaggerated the seriousness of the emails Hillary communicated with.

In other words, it was he who put the legality of the practice in the forefront. And now, ironically so, his family are doing exactly the same thing. What hypocrites! And in case you or any of our illustrious RWED members care to persist on Hillary's guilt in the matter; remember the FBI investigated and found nothing illegal in the thousands of emails. Otherwise she would be locked up; as would Jared and company, if ever it was found to have been handled in an illegal manner. Also, all it takes is one illegal or mishandled email to be charged, convicted and locked up.

Now think carefully before you respond.

---

You misunderstand, SGG.

The quote the OP put in the article was that he used a White House email address to conduct White House business.

If that's the case... I don't see what the issue is.


I don't think anybody in any government position should be using their work email addresses to conduct personal business. It just goes to show the hubris of these people that work in the public sector.

There was no way in hell that I was going to use the company email to send personal messages at my last good job. It was a well known fact that all emails sent within the company were subject to monitoring and that some people had been fired simply for sending "inappropriate" things. One of the managers had been fired while I worked there for sending one of these things to a female co-worker. They were friends. She didn't go to anybody and complain, and actually she was really messed up about it when he was fired. It was probably some random check that was done on emails that got him... or maybe somebody had it out for him for some reason...


I agree that anybody using their work emails in any public sector position for personal use should be punished.


Hillary did a lot more than that though. Assuming that all was done here was sending a personal email with the work account, trying to equate one to the other is not a valid argument.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

In my (govt) job, it's against policy to use your (govt-provided) email for personal business.

I have to say, I heard a bit of this on NPR, the part that I heard was "a hundred emails" "mostly to establish communication" and at that point I stopped listening. It sounded like a big nothing-burger, even on NPR.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

I started this thread to highlight the hypocrisy of some here. I knew it would be present in their responses. It shows they are not interested in facts but instead in promoteing a double standard.

Mission accomplished.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME