Real World Event Discussions

There is NO DIFFERENCE between the KKK, White Supremacists, and Nazi's

POSTED BY: Wishimay
UPDATED: Saturday, January 31, 2026 19:32
VIEWED: 12956
PAGE 3 of 9

Friday, September 1, 2017 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

When everybody is a Nazi, nobody is a Nazi... - SIX

The Nazis are easily identified. -REAVERFAN



Yanno, MR_REAVER, there are only a few people here that I would consider to be Nazi-like, and you're one of them. Until you disavow your statement of people-eradication, that is.



-----------
By the way, GSTRING, I predicted your response PERFECTLY
* ... and then you'll say I'm "too wordy". And then you will - as always- refuse to address the pertinent points, and respond with even more lies and even more bullshit personal attacks.*

And voila! Here it is http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=61835&mid=1
035581#1035581
]
Sorry, dupe.

You love and adore the alt-right murderers who terrorized Charlottesville. Antifa, OTOH, SAVED lives.

They are polar opposites: Nazis remain murderous terrorists, while Antifa remain lifesaving, freedom saving heroes.

You've repeatedly demonstrated that you're a brainwashed dupe who reads reichwing propaganda and lies and calls it "news." You can't tell a Nazi from a hero. You're a parody of yourself.

http://www.alternet.org/activism/why-its-just-bonkers-compare-fascists
-activists-trying-stop-them

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, September 2, 2017 12:16 AM

Oh, look. More Antifa helping people and saving lives:

http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/41803-antifa-and-leftists-organize-
mutual-aid-and-rescue-networks-in-houston


What are the Nazis doing, besides cheering whenever a black or brown person dies?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, September 2, 2017 1:49 PM

While that terrible racist Trump is doing nothing!

sarcasm, btw




Trump is not the problem. He set himself against the Deep State's agenda. And the Deep State's been heading for WWIII for years.
As for you, you're just a Deep State useful idiot, furthering its agenda. So I hope you enjoy cesium in your coffee. You've earned it.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, September 4, 2017 9:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Wishimay:
Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:



Yep, Socialists, Democrats, Liberal enforcers, all the same.




YES, THEY ARE ALL THE SAME IN THAT THEY ARE ALL MOSTLY NON-VIOLENT.




Respond to the chart, IF you can read, that is.



Islamic attacks account for 24% of domestic murders, yet the Muslim population of America hovers around 1% of Americans.

That makes sense.




That chart is BS, BTW...

I'm willing to bet 99% of the 762 murderers in Chicago in 2016 were not Republican. What does "extremism" even mean?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, September 4, 2017 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
Quote:

Originally posted by Wishimay:
Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Yep, Socialists, Democrats, Liberal enforcers, all the same.

YES, THEY ARE ALL THE SAME IN THAT THEY ARE ALL MOSTLY NON-VIOLENT.




Quote:

Quote:

Respond to the chart, IF you can read, that is.

Islamic attacks account for 24% of domestic murders, yet the Muslim population of America hovers around 1% of Americans.

That makes sense.


That chart is BS, BTW...

I'm willing to bet 99% of the 762 murderers in Chicago in 2016 were not Republican. What does "extremism" even mean?

Perhaps you have forgotten how Libtard statistics are compiled.
When Muslim Terrorists or Liberal Career Criminal Gangmutts use bullets for their peaceful murders, the guns are the perpetrators, and guns are categorized as right wing.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, September 6, 2017 1:56 PM

Quote:

Looks like you got that from wiki.
You'd be better served using the Merriam Webster definition, a bit.



No, But I did look up the word racist in Merriam-Webster's (Since 1828); I am about to "unglob" the definition(s):

First of all, I searched for racist and it gave me the definition of racism:

Quote:

1. a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capabilities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

2. a doctrine or political program based on the assumption of racism and designed to execute its principles
a political or social system founded on racism

3. racial prejudice or discrimination



...or maybe not; it seems that Webster's is the culprit for "globbing" together those three little words that pinpoint the meaning of "racism."

Perhaps if I search the words prejudice and discrimination. Maybe that will do the trick? Hmm!

Quote:

prejudice:

1. injury or damage resulting from some judgment or action of another in disregard of one's rights; especially: detriment to one's legal rights or claims

2. preconceived judgment or opinion. An adverse opinion or leaning formed without grounds or before sufficient knowledge. An instance of such judgment or opinion. An irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics



Notice that it states: An irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race

Quote:

discrimination:

1. the act of making or perceiving a difference: the act of discriminating
psychology: the process by which two stimuli differing in some aspect
are responded to differently

2. the quality or power of finely distinguishing

3. the act, practice, or an instance of discriminating categorically rather than individually
prejudiced or prejudicial outlook, action or treatment
(racial discrimination)



There you have it. Nothing more needs to be said.


SGG


Quote:

Your quote below:

3 parts to that definition you posted - 3 separate concepts, but globbed together indistinctly.
1. Prejudice. (To Pre-Judge)
2. Discrimination. (discern or treat unequally)
3. Belief in superiority.

#3: it would seem that a belief in superiority based solely upon racial composition is clear-cut enough that everyone might agree. Can't think of any group which would disagree.

So that leaves #1 and #2 to be unglobbed.
Some decades ago I learned that some Public Schools had started changing word definions such that Prejudice and Discrimination were the exact same word instead of two different words with different meanings. This confusion was created to belie the meaning of racism.

#2: when I discern or discriminate at the grocery store for my food purchases it's to get a good deal on the food based upon prices and quality - and avoiding blind allegiance to any mantra that "all food is equal" which some people do subscribe to.
But to discriminate for or against person(s) based purely upon perceived or assumed racial makeup is unfair and also illegal and immoral, unethical.

#1: Prejudice, or pre-judging, is an evolutionary instinct ingrained through thousands of generations of every living creature with a brain (and some without).
If you are moseying down the sidewalk and see an approaching tiger, is your first instinct to go pet the giant kitty and help it get back to the nearest zoo - or to seek protective shelter for you and yours? Perhaps your child might pick the former. But if adult you opts for the former, Darwinism will remove you from the gene pool in favor of those selecting the latter option. This is prejudice. It cannot be irradicated without rewiring the brain (and rendering humans defenseless, insipid, unviable).
By not letting your prejudice control you, and choosing to override your instinct, you can determine other options or courses of action, but the prejudice will

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, September 6, 2017 3:15 PM

You waited long enough to reply that my linkies got deleted.
Not sure if you are trying to disagree, or if you caught on.
I'll try to help with clarification.

Quote:

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Quote:

Looks like you got that from wiki.
You'd be better served using the Merriam Webster definition, a bit.

No, But I did look up the word racist in Merriam-Webster's (Since 1828); I am about to "unglob" the definition(s):

First of all, I searched for racist and it gave me the definition of racism:
Quote:

1. a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capabilities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

That is the same as #3 from wiki, and my discussion.
Quote:

Quote:

2.

correction: this is definition 2.a.
Quote:

Quote:

a doctrine or political program based on the assumption of racism and designed to execute its principles

correction: this is definition 2.b.
Quote:

Quote:

a political or social system founded on racism

using the defined term twice within the definition of the term? That hardly seems like a historically refined entry, more like a poorly revised redefinition.
Quote:

Quote:

3. racial prejudice or discrimination
...or maybe not; it seems that Webster's is the culprit for "globbing" together those three little words that pinpoint the meaning of "racism."

You mean the 2 words.
Quote:

is
Perhaps if I search the words prejudice and discrimination. Maybe that will do the trick? Hmm!
Quote:

prejudice:

1.


this #1 is a Judicial or Legal definition, not applicable here
Quote:

Quote:

2. preconceived judgment or opinion. An adverse opinion or leaning formed without grounds or before sufficient knowledge. An instance of such judgment or opinion. An irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics
Notice that it states: An irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race

Yes, you are effectively repeating what I explained: an instinct, devoid of reason or rationality
Quote:

Quote:

discrimination:

1. the act of making or perceiving a difference: the act of discriminating
psychology: the process by which two stimuli differing in some aspect
are responded to differently

2. the quality or power of finely distinguishing

3. the act, practice, or an instance of discriminating categorically rather than individually
prejudiced or prejudicial outlook, action or treatment
(racial discrimination)


1 and 2 are effectively what I explained using grocery anecdote. #3 is what I explained as the act of controlling, or not, the reaction to the instinctual characteristic of prejudice.
So are we on the same page?
Quote:

There you have it. Nothing more needs to be said.

SGG
Quote:

Your quote below:

3 parts to that definition you posted - 3 separate concepts, but globbed together indistinctly.
1. Prejudice. (To Pre-Judge)
2. Discrimination. (discern or treat unequally)
3. Belief in superiority.

#3: it would seem that a belief in superiority based solely upon racial composition is clear-cut enough that everyone might agree. Can't think of any group which would disagree.

So that leaves #1 and #2 to be unglobbed.
Some decades ago I learned that some Public Schools had started changing word definitons such that Prejudice and Discrimination were the exact same word instead of two different words with different meanings. This confusion was created to belie the meaning of racism.

#2: when I discern or discriminate at the grocery store for my food purchases it's to get a good deal on the food based upon prices and quality - and avoiding blind allegiance to any mantra that "all food is equal" which some people do subscribe to.
But to discriminate for or against person(s) based purely upon perceived or assumed racial makeup is unfair

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, September 6, 2017 6:06 PM

More blacks are killed by blacks than any other race. By a factor of 5, actually.

Do black people hate black people?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, September 7, 2017 2:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
More blacks are killed by blacks than any other race. By a factor of 5, actually.

Do black people hate black people?

Obviously they do - otherwise why would they kill each other?

Or was your question rhetorical?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, January 21, 2018 7:50 PM

Noticed thread Title again.
Sure, KKK has always been the enforcement arm of the Democrat Party.
And Nazis and America's Democrats have always copied each other's tactics and strategies.
And the White Supremacist DixieCrats are where the Democrat Party has built up electoral resilience.
And subjugating others is what Democraps and all other Libtards long for.

I don't think they will accept those facts though.
They will attempt to disperse the blame to any group other than themselves, where the actual connection squarely resides.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME