Fake news: CNN; NYT; VICE; WaPo; WSJ. ... now ABC .... It's like a trainwreck, but I can't stop watching
POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Tuesday, November 26, 2024 20:53
VIEWED: 12976
PAGE 10 of 13
Quote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2017/07/27/the-q
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
FROM THE WASHINGTON POST
With the Democrats and their allies in the media beginning to walk away from the collusion story, the single biggest thing keeping this story alive is the president’s obsession with it. No doubt the issue will continue to be irresistible to some of Trump’s haters. Some will never believe the truth, no matter what else is revealed. But if Democrats and the president’s worst enemies can begin to silently acknowledge the obvious and move on, perhaps Trump can, too. Maybe now he will see the futility of continuing to whine, tweet, moan and seethe about the whole non-affair. Maybe the president will now see that he should leave Sessions alone so that he can get on with his work. Maybe he will let special counsel Robert S. Mueller III quietly do his job and the whole “Russian collusion” affair won’t even be a footnote in the retelling of the story of the Trump campaign.
uest-to-prove-collusion-is-crumbling/?utm_term=.ab223a777d48
I love that last paragraph. The WaPo just can't help itself, can it?
One side of their mouth basically saying that they have been involved in 7 months of "reporting" a bullshit narrative, and then the other side of their mouth wrapping it up by saying that "maybe now he can stop being a big orange baby".
lol
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I've seen a decrease in the anti-Trump/ 'collusion' rhetoric. That may or may not be due to counter-intelligence. But that's a stupid political game. If the Awan brothers were blackmailing politicians as suspected, they should be investigated, prosecuted, tried, and - if guilty - made to serve the maximum sentence. There should be no quid pro quo between the Trump administration and lawbreakers - my silence over your lawbreaking for your cease-fire on 'collusion'.
OTOH I'm seeing a sharp spike in anti-Russia articles over the last few weeks, especially regarding Ukraine, the Baltics, Georgia, Eastern Europe in general, and NATO. We're being groomed into another incestuous torrid affair.
Trump is not the problem. He set himself against the Deep State's agenda. And the Deep State's been heading for WWIII for years.
As for you, you're just a Deep State useful idiot, furthering its agenda. So I hope you enjoy cesium in your coffee. You've earned it.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The sad thing is, the moment the media stops hyping the 'collusion' frenzy, it'll disappear from the collective American mind, and be as if it never existed at all. All that anger and hate will quickly evaporate.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=61682&mid=1
035311#1035311 People can be driven to war, it is true. A relentless media campaign can cause the heartland to become so fearful or liberals to become so outraged that they will take to the streets to demand blood. And despite the fact that you ... the supposed intelligent liberal elite... have seen this over and over again, you keep falling for the same bullshit again and again.
And how can people learn when the past of a mere few weeks ago can be erased so completely?
And, without reference to how this cycle has happened over, and over, and over, and over, people will be driven to the next focus de jour.
Trump is not the problem. He set himself against the Deep State's agenda. And the Deep State's been heading for WWIII for years.
As for you, you're just a Deep State useful idiot, furthering its agenda. So I hope you enjoy cesium in your coffee. You've earned it.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by G:
That wasn't written by The WaPo. It was written by a big DC lobbyist, Ed Rogers. Rogers will take anyone's money.
If it's printed in the WaPo, the WaPo wrote it. It doesn't matter where it originated if they print it in full.
Of course, I can't verify this because I can't see the link without giving my money to WaPo which would never happen as long as I live.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
The sad thing is, the moment the media stops hyping the 'collusion' frenzy, it'll disappear from the collective American mind, and be as if it never existed at all. All that anger and hate will quickly evaporate.
And how can people learn when the past of a mere few weeks ago can be erased so completely?
And, without reference to how this cycle has happened over, and over, and over, and over, people will be driven to the next focus de jour.
They can't learn, and they won't learn.
This isn't some new phenomenon. Orwell wrote extensively about it in the 40's and 50's and I assume it wasn't exactly a new thing back then either.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Anthony Scaramucci out as White House communications director
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/anthony-scaramucci-white-house-communic
ations-director/story?id=48952277
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
And how can people learn when the past of a mere few weeks ago can be erased so completely?
They can't learn, and they won't learn.
This isn't some new phenomenon. Orwell wrote extensively about it in the 40's and 50's and I assume it wasn't exactly a new thing back then either.
People in general are much smarter than the media believes they are. The blatantly biased media has rendered itself an irrelevant laughing-stock.
They sat there on election night humiliated, stunned, and depressed. They still haven't learned a gorram thing from that titanic ass-whooping they got.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
If it's printed in the WaPo, the WaPo wrote it.
Quote:
Originally posted by G:
How does the WaPo write something?
I don't know. You were the one who said they didn't write something here:
Quote:
Originally posted by G:
That wasn't written by The WaPo. It was written by a big DC lobbyist, Ed Rogers. Rogers will take anyone's money.
One would assume that if something didn't write it, then the opposite could also be true.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by G:Quote:
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:Quote:
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
If it's printed in the WaPo, the WaPo wrote it.Quote:
Originally posted by G:
How does the WaPo write something?
I don't know. You were the one who said they didn't write something here:Quote:
Originally posted by G:
That wasn't written by The WaPo. It was written by a big DC lobbyist, Ed Rogers. Rogers will take anyone's money.
One would assume that if something didn't write it, then the opposite could also be true.
You're so clever you've confused yourself.
You said the Wapo wrote it, suggesting a paper - a non-person - could write something, because it's easier for you to think in small boxes I suspect or you just don't give a sh*t. I said, no, a lobbyist - who is motivated by money and strong gop ties - wrote it and supplied links to back that up. And then you shorted out.
==============================
You said it wasn't fucking written by the WaPo first.
Read it again.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Behind Fox News' Baseless Seth Rich Story: The Untold Tale
The Fox News Channel and a wealthy supporter of President Trump worked in concert under the watchful eye of the White House to concoct a story about the death of a young Democratic National Committee aide, according to a lawsuit filed Tuesday.
http://www.npr.org/2017/08/01/540783715/lawsuit-alleges-fox-news-and-t
rump-supporter-created-fake-news-story
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME