Poll Shows Americans' Massive Disapproval Of Both Parties: "Now It's Just An Oligarchy"
POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Monday, August 4, 2025 19:12
VIEWED: 5138
PAGE 1 of 3
Quote:
The «Monthly Harvard-Harris Poll: June 2017» is the latest poll in that series, and it scientifically sampled 2,258 U.S. registered voters, of whom (as shown on page 30) 35% were «Democrat», 29% were «Republican», and 30% were «independent»). It indicates (page 24) that 37% «approve» and 63% «disapprove» of «the way the Republican Party is handling its job».
It also indicates (page 25) that 38% «approve», and 62% «disapprove», of «the way the Democratic Party is handling its job». So: despite there being 6% more self-described «Democrat»s than «Republican»s, there was only 1% more disapproval of the Republican Party than of the Democratic Party; and, this indicates that there was a substantial disapproval of «the Democratic Party» by Democratic voters (more disaffection by them for ‘their’ Party, than Republicans have for theirs).
The answers to other questions in the poll also help to provide an answer as to why this is so, and why the voting public don’t hold either Party in high regard — why America’s supposedly ‘democratic’ (small-«D») politics is currently a contest between uglies, with neither Party offering anything like what the U.S. voting public want their government to do (i.e., it fits what this scientific study found actually to control U.S. politics):
(Page 27) 41% think «President Trump should be impeached and removed from office», and 45% think «no action should be taken» against him.
(Page 28) 36% think «the investigations into Russia and President Trump» are «helping the country», and 64% think they’re «hurting the country».
(Page 39) Of listed U.S. government officials, the highest percentage-favorable ratings were: Bernie Sanders (52%), Mike Pence (47%), Donald Trump (45%), Hillary Clinton (39%), Paul Ryan (38%), Elizabeth Warren (37%), Jim Comey (36%), Robert Mueller (34%), Nancy Pelosi (31%), Jeff Sessions (28%), and Rex Tillerson (28%).
(Page 40) The highest percentage-unfavorable ratings were: Hillary Clinton (56%), Nancy Pelosi (51%), Donald Trump (50%), Paul Ryan (45%), Mitch McConnell (42%), Jeff Sessions (41%), Mike Pence (40%), Jared Kushner (39%), Bernie Sanders (38%), Jim Comey (36%), and Elizabeth Warren (36%).
(Page 72) 48% think «President Trump colluded with the Russians during the election over the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and John Podesta’s emails». 52% say «No» — Trump did not do that.
(Page 73) 54% say «associates of President Trump» did it; 46% say «No» to that.
(Page 74) 38% say «There is evidence» of such «collusion» by Trump; 62% say «No».
(Page 75) 54% say this is a «legitimate investigation»; 46% say it’s «fueled to create a cloud over the Trump administration».
(Page 79) 44% say «Keep the focus on the Russia investigation»; 56% say «Move on to other issues».
(Page 83) 73% say they are «concerned» that there has been «lost focus and energy by the administration and Congress because of the Russia investigation». 67% say they’re «concerned» about «future interference by Russia in U.S. elections».
(Page 95) 54% say «Yes» and 46% say «No» to «Do you think the so called ‘Deep State’ — the collection of intelligence agencies and holdover government workers from the Obama administration — is trying to unseat President Trump?»
(Page 96) When asked «Who do you think is more to blame for Hillary Clinton’s loss of the election?» 67% choose «Hillary Clinton and her campaign team for running a weak campaign» and 33% choose «Forces like the Russians, former FBI director Comey, and the Democratic National Committee not having reliable voter data».
(Page 124) 74% «Favor» «Offering incentives for electric cNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, who was the last person who was able to win the White House without needing to rely upon billionaires in order to do it, was correct when he said that, «Now it's just an oligarchy with unlimited political bribery being the essence of getting the nominations for president or being elected president. And the same thing applies to governors, and U.S. Senators and congress members».
Anybody who refers to this government as being a ‘democracy’ is way behind the times, because it has been, ever since 1980, controlled by its aristocracy; it is an «oligarchy» instead of a democracy; it is a «regime» instead of a government that represents its public. This regime represents its aristocrats. And that is why the public’s disapproval of this country’s leaders is so high.
I think it's pretty silly for anybody to put a date on it and say that in 1980 things somehow magically changed.
Maybe Jimmy Carter didn't rely on Billionaires, but without doing any research into it I think I can safely say that he relied on quite a few Millionaires.
Nolan Ryan was the first Professional Athlete to be paid $1,000,000 dollars for a single year, and that was in 1979.
http://www.baseball-almanac.com/firsts/first9.shtml
Fast forward to today and Derek Carr is getting $25 million a year for a five year contract he just signed. I'm sure that's not the top pro athlete pay, but it's the largest per-year contract in the NFL according to an article from last month.
http://www.cheatsheet.com/sports/biggest-contracts-nfl-history.html/?a
=viewall
More importantly the MLB league minimum salary in 2017 is more than the President of the USA makes at $535,000. That means that every one of the shittiest players in professional baseball in 2017 are getting paid more than half what one of the greatest pitchers in MLB history got paid in 1979.
http://royalsportsgroup.info/mlb-minimum-salary/
Jimmy Carter wasn't supported by Billionaires simply because there weren't any back then. Today it's not all that uncommon. The number of "Millionaires" out there is pretty staggering compared to 1979 and prior.
People really need to take inflation into account when reporting "facts". I see this happen everywhere. Not just in politics.
Whether they make these "mistakes" because of lazy reporting or to fit their agenda, they get away with it because a majority of people are stupid when it comes to money.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Those people should have voted for Johnson.
I'm in Wisconsin, which used to have a reputation as a state with clean politics, if only statewide level. But Herbie Kohl put an end to that. It's gotten muddier since then.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:How do you plan to make all this sense and reason digestible to the masses? The mere fact that you are using facts and truth means that, by definition, all Libtards will not accept these facts for the truth that they are.
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:Quote:
Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, who was the last person who was able to win the White House without needing to rely upon billionaires in order to do it, was correct when he said that, «Now it's just an oligarchy with unlimited political bribery being the essence of getting the nominations for president or being elected president. And the same thing applies to governors, and U.S. Senators and congress members».
Anybody who refers to this government as being a ‘democracy’ is way behind the times, because it has been, ever since 1980, controlled by its aristocracy; it is an «oligarchy» instead of a democracy; it is a «regime» instead of a government that represents its public. This regime represents its aristocrats. And that is why the public’s disapproval of this country’s leaders is so high.
I think it's pretty silly for anybody to put a date on it and say that in 1980 things somehow magically changed.
Maybe Jimmy Carter didn't rely on Billionaires, but without doing any research into it I think I can safely say that he relied on quite a few Millionaires.
Nolan Ryan was the first Professional Athlete to be paid $1,000,000 dollars for a single year, and that was in 1979.
http://www.baseball-almanac.com/firsts/first9.shtml
Fast forward to today and Derek Carr is getting $25 million a year for a five year contract he just signed. I'm sure that's not the top pro athlete pay, but it's the largest per-year contract in the NFL according to an article from last month.
http://www.cheatsheet.com/sports/biggest-contracts-nfl-history.html/?a
=viewall
More importantly the MLB league minimum salary in 2017 is more than the President of the USA makes at $535,000. That means that every one of the shittiest players in professional baseball in 2017 are getting paid more than half what one of the greatest pitchers in MLB history got paid in 1979.
http://royalsportsgroup.info/mlb-minimum-salary/
Jimmy Carter wasn't supported by Billionaires simply because there weren't any back then. Today it's not all that uncommon. The number of "Millionaires" out there is pretty staggering compared to 1979 and prior.
People really need to take inflation into account when reporting "facts". I see this happen everywhere. Not just in politics.
Whether they make these "mistakes" because of lazy reporting or to fit their agenda, they get away with it because a majority of people are stupid when it comes to money.
How do you circumvent their FACTS Vaccine, their allergies to truth?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
What you're complaining about is your political party is not working. National parties that have won Congress and the White House have disbanded in the past. It is time for the GOP to disband:
Quote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whig_Party_(United_States)#Decline
When new issues of nativism, prohibition, and anti-slavery burst on the scene in the mid-1850s, few looked to the quickly disintegrating Whig Party for answers. In the North most ex-Whigs joined the new Republican Party, and in the South, they flocked to a new short-lived American Party.
During the Lincoln Administration (1861–65), ex-Whigs dominated the Republican Party and enacted much of their American System. Later their Southern colleagues dominated the White response to Reconstruction. In the long run, America adopted Whiggish economic policies coupled with a Democratic strong presidency.
During the latter part of the American Civil War, and during the Reconstruction Era, many former Whigs tried to regroup in the South, calling themselves "Conservatives" and hoping to reconnect with the ex-Whigs in the North. These were merged into the Democratic Party in the South, but they continued to promote modernization policies such as large-scale railroad construction and the founding of public schools.
In today's discourse in American politics, the Whig Party is often cited as an example of a political party that lost its followers and its reason for being, as by the expression "going the way of the Whigs," a term referred to by Donald Critchlow in his book, The Conservative Ascendancy: How the GOP Right Made Political History. Critchlow points out that the application of the term by Republicans in the GOP of 1974 may have been a misnomer; the old Whig party enjoyed more political support before its demise than the GOP in the aftermath of Nixon's resignation.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And it's time for the Dems to disband as well, because there is MORE dissatisfaction among Dems/Independents with the DNC than among Republicans/Independents with the GOP.
The DNC should be asking itself why Trump looked like a better option to enough Americans to make him competitive. At first, the DNC was happy that Trump won, but they still haven't learned from their mistake.
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.
I'll accept your apology any time, THUGR. But I know you're not man enough to give me one
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
One, or both, parties need to pull their head out of their ass.
The reason why Trump looked like a better alternative than Hillary to so many people is because OBAMA failed many Americans, and Hillary looked like she would do even worse. Trump, at least, was an unknown.
So, when is either party going to get on the stick and start offering real solutions to our collective American problems???
Just look at healthcare: The GOP is in an ideological quandary because most of GOP Congresspeople know that Americans don't want the "free market" (monopolistic) crap that the conservative wing would push. On the other hand, the Dems refuse to step up to the plate and publicly offer a better solution.
A pox on both their houses, I say. They both deserve to fail.
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.
I'll accept your apology any time, THUGR. But I know you're not man enough to give me one
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump blows Putin because he wants to be a dictator, too. He admires Hitler! The US has been an oligarchy forever.
https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+admires+hitler&rlz=1C1PRFE_e
nUS672US672&oq=trump+admires+hitler&aqs=chrome..69i57.7233j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Who did Obama fail?
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
One, or both, parties need to pull their head out of their ass.
The reason why Trump looked like a better alternative than Hillary to so many people is because OBAMA failed many Americans, and Hillary looked like she would do even worse. Trump, at least, was an unknown.
So, when is either party going to get on the stick and start offering real solutions to our collective American problems???
Just look at healthcare: The GOP is in an ideological quandary because most of GOP Congresspeople know that Americans don't want the "free market" (monopolistic) crap that the conservative wing would push. On the other hand, the Dems refuse to step up to the plate and publicly offer a better solution.
A pox on both their houses, I say. They both deserve to fail.
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.
I'll accept your apology any time, THUGR. But I know you're not man enough to give me one
That's right. Nobody but the people who care about the environment. ACA was and is a roaring success. Why do you lie all the time? What's in it for you?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Pretty much everybody who works for a living.
Who did Obama fail?
Quote:You mean that Obama failed people who care for the environment?
That's right. Nobody but the people who care about the environment.
Quote:
ACA was and is a roaring success.
Why do you lie all the time? What's in it for you?
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.
I'll accept your apology any time, THUGR. But I know you're not man enough to give me one
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME