Fake news: CNN; NYT; VICE; WaPo; WSJ. ... now ABC .... It's like a trainwreck, but I can't stop watching
POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Tuesday, November 26, 2024 20:53
VIEWED: 12976
PAGE 4 of 13
I'll say it again SIG (comrade). Time and the truth are on my side. Just like with Syria and the Ukraine. You have stripped yourself of any semblance of decency or truthfulness in your defense of Russia and now Trump. 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
I'll say it again SIG (comrade). Time and the truth are on my side. Just like with Syria and the Ukraine. You have stripped yourself of any semblance of decency or truthfulness in your defense of Russia and now Trump.
What will you do if your POV blows up in your face?
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.
I'll accept your apology any time, THUGR. But I know you're not man enough to give me one
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
I'll say it again SIG (comrade). Time and the truth are on my side. Just like with Syria and the Ukraine. You have stripped yourself of any semblance of decency or truthfulness in your defense of Russia and now Trump.
What will you do if your POV implodes in real life?
Truth and the facts are your biggest detractor in these threads. Not me or anyone here comrade.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:You have brought not a single fact to this thread; or to most threads. Jeez.
Truth and the facts are your biggest detractor in these threads. Not me or anyone here comrade.= THUGR
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.
I'll accept your apology any time, THUGR. But I know you're not man enough to give me one
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:You have brought not a single fact to this thread; or to most threads. Jeez.
Truth and the facts are your biggest detractor in these threads. Not me or anyone here comrade.= THUGR
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.
I'll accept your apology any time, THUGR. But I know you're not man enough to give me one
Here's a fact for ya. Your signature is that of a trolls. Funny how you're so ignorant you don't realize you are exposing yourself that way.
It also shows I own you. I'm in your head. Every time you make a post it shows I'm in your head. The fact that you post my signature back to me at times shows it's in your head as well; good.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It occurs to me that this ongoing and pointless investigation of nothing may create the same backlash as Ken Starr's relentless expedition up Bill Clinton's anus and into his colon, looking for something ... ANYthing ... with which to hang Bill. And impeaching a President because he lied about his sex life- which, really, should remain private - was a travesty of justice. That's the reason that MoveOn.org was founded, and rightly so!
Now, I didn't vote for Bill the second time. but that wasn't because of Monica or Whitewater, that was because of his bad policies. And, just to restate, so that I don't get accused of AGAIN "changing my story" those policies were:
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)
Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)
Commodities Futures Modernization Act
Repeal of Glass-Steagall
NAFTA/CAFTA; WTO; and a "landmark trade deal" with China
Ending "welfare as we know it"
Don't ask, don't tell
Anyway, I'm wondering if a kind of emotional backlash is beginning already. I think people are starting not to care. And if the stock market implodes like I think it will, or other financial meltdowns occur, then people REALLY won't care about "Russia" ... or even "Syria" for that matter. They'll have far more important things to worry about.
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.
I'll accept your apology any time, THUGR. But I know you're not man enough to give me one
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by G:
I used to like Stossel way back.
1. The hand waving Trump does is different for when he mocks the handicapped reporter - it's larger. Stossel tries to minimize it by saying he mocks other people the same way. What? Stossel justifies his mocking of others? That's 5 year old sh*t.
He's explaining, not " justifying ". And yes, he does similar gestures w/ Cruz and the General. Could be he's more agitated at he reporter for his comments, plus I doubt he views him on par w/ Cruz or said general. Thus, he feels he can mock him a degree or two more ? And Stossel is right... the reporter CAN'T move his arms, and so Trump mocks him by exaggerated movements ? It's a weak defense for those who claim Trump was ONLY making fun of the handicapped reporter.
Quote:
2. His defense of Trump saying he lied about going into Iraq? Who even remembers or cared abut what no-candidate Trump said about Iraq. Even if you do, "Yeah... I guess so." That's a defense? Weak tea bro. And then wondering why the Elite Media isn't going back to correct what they supposedly said (no cites were given by Stossel, just "I read."). Why would they spend time going backwards to clarify something that wasn't proven? Talk about a nothing burger.
Stossel's right again. Trump wasn't overly pro going in or not.
Quote:
3. And why does Fox keep bringing up Hollywood? Pandering maybe? Because Fox knows their viewers hate those "rich pampered elitist fuckers!" "Like college graduates! Hate those arrogant snobs! How dare they get a college degree!" Fox plays their audience for fools, counts on them to be idiots. They actually mock their own audience.
Who are you talking about ? Rare is it that the " Hollywood elites " have college degrees. But usually it's the Ivy league, N.E. Liberal types , or the Berkeley socialists who get the brunt of the attention from FOX. Oh, and have you seen how BLM loving Missouri is doing these days ?
Quote:
4. I love how he tries to portray how much attention gets in the press and how unfair that is. He coveted that same attention which got him elected rep candidate. Now it's unfair? They won't cover him if he's not bringing viewers, so if it bothers him how about he work on being boring and STF once and while?
And how about the irony??? Stossel and his buddy saying how unfair the coverage of Trump is in a 12 minute piece about...? TRUMP! Yeah, even Fux knows they get more eyeballs talking about Trump. Especially "Trump being treated unfairly!"
You can't deny the content of what is being discussed.
Quote:
I got as far as their outrage over the NYT publishing the 2 page spread of all of Trumps lies and insults, where and who and when. Seems they didn't get the substance of it. And now it's prophetic.
Most of those things probably aren't even lies. Just matters where Trump misspoke, got something wrong, or simply disagrees w/ the NYT.
Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen
I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Riverlove:
New York Times Forced To Retract Longstanding Lie About Russian Interference
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/06/29/nyt-finally-retracts-russia-gate
-canard/
So the whole "17 intelligence agencies confirm Russian hacking" story the Dems eagerly and desperately latched on to and gleefully spread was a big lie. It was total bullshit. Once again Susan Rice lied her ass off on tv to the American people. So did CNN, MSNBC, and the major networks.
They tell and repeat the lie thousands of times since 2016, and then there's a quick silent retraction, but by then their vile lies have taken root. I never believed any of it. How fucking pathetic for those that did.
Quote:I'm just gonna say I knew about this a long time ago. WAaaaayyy back when, I posted a link to the original assessment, which did NOT have the signatures of all 17 agencies, and of the 4 agencies that DID sign on, the FBI I believe, demurred on the conclusion specifically.
Correction: June 29, 2017
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.
But, not too many people are interested in original documents and facts.
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Another link, this one from Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/worldpolitics/comments/6kclzu/new_york_times_
forced_to_retract_longstanding_lie/
SIG, 1kiki, you being Bolsheviks, or members of the Russian Social Democratic Party, you don't understand how our intelligence agencies work; or coordinate. Besides, what you do here is lie to protect Russia. So, even if you did understand you would still lie.
Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, the DNI, works closely with a President-appointed, Senate-confirmed Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence to effectively integrate all national and homeland security intelligence in defense of the homeland and in support of U.S. national security interests.
He spoke for all of our intelligence agencies regarding the Russian interference. That's a part of his job comrades. He stated that after reviewing it, all 17 signed off on the evidence collected by the four agencies your article speaks too. What you're suggesting is a lie, is instead semantics. All 17 agencies did not collect the intelligence. But they all signed off on it. All that is needed is for Coats to confer with them and state what their beliefs are. And he did.
Your guys would never pass our citizenship or nationalization test.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I've heard that if given a nationality test out of the blue with no preparation, a majority of Americans would fail it.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME