Trumps thread of lies
POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Monday, August 17, 2026 22:39
VIEWED: 27028
PAGE 2 of 28
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Read the TIMES article for yourself moron. You're ignoring all the different places you can confirm what is true or not because you can't get past the women on the View.
Where was the Times article about all of Obama's lies? There were plenty of them.
Had they called them out as they were happening I would be more inclined to bother reading it.
They didn't. I'm not.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
That's right, don't be afraid there Six, speak right up.
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
OMG, the view.
We can't trust CNN anymore. Let's listen to a bunch of crack-pot ultra-lib feminist washed up celebs and wannabes.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Ya know, he does use that Twitter a lot, and then the next day Spicey has to tap dance around his comments to, shall we say, claim innocence and that he's speaking truth.
What a charmed life Spicey leads!
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by Wishimay:Quote:
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
CNN
People like you and grams that have been believing all the lies. That's who.
The idiot lies every other night on twitter, and then the next day tries to rationalize it out. Has nothing to do with CNN, the View or anyone else.
It's from his OWN SELF. If you can't see it it's because you don't WANT TO.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Every politician lies to achieve their goals, because they couldn't do anything with half of the country being nuts and all (on all sides). That is expected.
Trump lies to try desperately to make himself look good, or to make himself feel better, or to make his opponents look bad for questioning da fuhrer.
THAT is the difference. One is a politician, one is a personality disorder.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Read the TIMES article for yourself moron. You're ignoring all the different places you can confirm what is true or not because you can't get past the women on the View.
Where was the Times article about all of Obama's lies? There were plenty of them.
Had they called them out as they were happening I would be more inclined to bother reading it.
They didn't. I'm not.
Your reaction to the story is one of a moron. Therefore, I am not surprised you posted it. Your response is a fallacy of relative privation. This is a type of red herring or distraction from actual issues. In this case the facts. The fallacy in your case is essentially an argument that a problem is not important because the source is biased. Even though the source is one of the most respected news outlets in the country.
Your problem Jack, is that during Obamas Presidency you were drunk. All your thinking was screwed up. Yet you still refuse to let go of a logic build on booze, a lack of forethought and research.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Hey, that's splitting some mighty fine hairs, WISHY.
Every politician lies to achieve their goals, because they couldn't do anything with half of the country being nuts and all (on all sides). That is expected.
Trump lies to try desperately to make himself look good, or to make himself feel better, or to make his opponents look bad for questioning da fuhrer. THAT is the difference. One is a politician, one is a personality disorder.
In looking back at Presidents and Presidential candidates, it seems to me that nearly all of them have a serious personality disorder of some sort. Like Obama, acting like some inspiring humanitarian, all the while managing a secret "kill list" (which BTW included American targets. So much for "restoring habeas corpus"!)
Or Hillary, who laughed and clapped at Libya's destruction and Qaddafi's anal-rape-by-bayonet.
Quote:Wow, THUGR, it sounds like you reached into a grab-bag of rhetorical tricks and got a fistful, whether they applied or not! (Hint: not).
Your reaction to the story is one of a moron. Therefore, I am not surprised you posted it. Your response is a fallacy of relative privation. This is a type of red herring or distraction from actual issues. In this case the facts. The fallacy in your case is essentially an argument that a problem is not important because the source is biased. Even though the source is one of the most respected news outlets in the country.
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.
I'll accept your apology any time, THUGR. But I know you're not man enough to give me one
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Read the TIMES article for yourself moron. You're ignoring all the different places you can confirm what is true or not because you can't get past the women on the View.
Where was the Times article about all of Obama's lies? There were plenty of them.
Had they called them out as they were happening I would be more inclined to bother reading it.
They didn't. I'm not.
Your reaction to the story is one of a moron. Therefore, I am not surprised you posted it. Your response is a fallacy of relative privation. This is a type of red herring or distraction from actual issues. In this case the facts. The fallacy in your case is essentially an argument that a problem is not important because the source is biased. Even though the source is one of the most respected news outlets in the country.
Your problem Jack, is that during Obamas Presidency you were drunk. All your thinking was screwed up. Yet you still refuse to let go of a logic build on booze, a lack of forethought and research.
lol...
Trump was already the worst president we ever had months before he even took office. Protests all across the seaboards in major cities with tens and even hundreds of thousands of people chanting FUCK TRUMP the day after he was elected. People from minority and the LGBT community were coming out and saying they were afraid for their lives now that he was elected.
If the MSM and you guys had given him even one week before the attacks started, you might have something there.
You didn't. You don't.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Read the TIMES article for yourself moron. You're ignoring all the different places you can confirm what is true or not because you can't get past the women on the View.
Where was the Times article about all of Obama's lies? There were plenty of them.
Had they called them out as they were happening I would be more inclined to bother reading it.
They didn't. I'm not.
Your reaction to the story is one of a moron. Therefore, I am not surprised you posted it. Your response is a fallacy of relative privation. This is a type of red herring or distraction from actual issues. In this case the facts. The fallacy in your case is essentially an argument that a problem is not important because the source is biased. Even though the source is one of the most respected news outlets in the country.
Your problem Jack, is that during Obamas Presidency you were drunk. All your thinking was screwed up. Yet you still refuse to let go of a logic build on booze, a lack of forethought and research.
lol...
Trump was already the worst president we ever had months before he even took office. Protests all across the seaboards in major cities with tens and even hundreds of thousands of people chanting FUCK TRUMP the day after he was elected. People from minority and the LGBT community were coming out and saying they were afraid for their lives now that he was elected.
If the MSM and you guys had given him even one week before the attacks started, you might have something there.
You didn't. You don't.
I think this best describes you Jack.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yeah? Here's a picture of you:
Cute cape.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME