Countdown Clock to Trumps impeachment " STARTS"
POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Monday, April 14, 2025 23:28
VIEWED: 485499
PAGE 5 of 404
No way to derive any of what you say here from the picture. As for Milo, you won’t find were I criticized you for defending him. Only that I think his career is in more trouble than your post suggested. In the current news was the first I heard of Maher’s indiscretions. I have never liked him. His views are too extreme and he’s so smug about it.
As for Trump and people wanting him impeached. There are always those in both parties that make false claims about Presidents right out of the gate. That will never change. About Trump, I have always complained about too much outsourcing. The destruction of our rule of law with all the illegals. Not just by coming here but in ways never discussed. What it did and does to lower wages in this country. There are also other things Trump touched on I liked hearing. That’s the problem with a presidential candidate and now President spreading a populist message. But in this country especially it means trouble again for our rule of law. As well as the erosion of our moral base. Then there is the fact that the guy is classless.
Trump has been shown to be a corrupt business man who demeans all of our democrat institutions. The media, judicial, house and senate, you name it. Along with that, he picked senseless fights with our allies and undermined NATO. All of which is what, Putin’s agenda.
Trump has shown himself to be clueless when it comes to the current structure of the world order. Or how to play in it to our advantage. Now, when you add that to the fact that many including myself believe he will break the law sooner rather than later, impeachment seems plausible to us.
Quote:
Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
If someone thinks a picture of a few hundred or even a thousand protesters implies a good chance Milo will be redeemed in the eyes of the public, someone is kidding themselves. Every time he has an event where he speaks his detractors are going to chant pedophile. Besides, there's no story of who is protesting and why. Are you sure that's not a crowd at an anti Trump rally?
Cites please...
Also, Bill Maher is guilty of saying the same thing as Milo and is having to answer for that now. The difference is that it is very conceivable that Milo acted out himself with minors.
---------------------
It's actually the anti-Milo protest. I meant, look, millions of people want to overthrow democracy just because Trump won. Oh well, so much for the "they would never do that theory."
CPAC dug up the Maher footage to doom Milo, that's openly known, as is the Milo-Pence feud. That it splashes back and hit's Maher, that's life. Will it doom Milo? I doubt it.
Look back at my rant threads against Milo to see where I stand on that.
---------------------
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Today, Trump gave a speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference that only deepened the questions around Trump and Russia.
He denounced the Washington Post reporting that led to National Security Adviser Michael Flynn’s firing, for example, as having been based on fake sources. But if the sources were fake, then why did he fire Flynn?
Then he specifically denounced the whole idea of stories based on anonymous sources. But just hours ago, the Trump White House held an anonymous briefing with senior White House officials to deny reports that Chief of Staff Reince Priebus had made improper contact with the FBI regarding the investigation of Trump and Russia.
www.vox.com/2017/2/24/14725950/russian-flag-cpac
Questions about what exactly is going on here won’t stop until the White House allows a thorough and independent investigation.
www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/2/20/14625788/trump-russia-putin-
manafort-page-stone
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Nope... Vox isn't News either.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:One way to stop Trump from rewriting his true personal history would be to get it on paper as it happens and then lock the paper in a place where Trump can't get to it. That is why Trump is against newspapers. Or the news in general. Instead of news, Trump loves propaganda he can rewrite on a daily basis. He really hates his actual past, doesn't he? He can't stop talking about it because the way it was written down on paper by the news is different than the way he claims it to be now and in the future. Typical super salesmen continuously alters history until they have a version that will help them close the sale. It is a trick that only works on people that are below average in memory -- which is half the people you know, including yourself, 6ix. Salesmen who want to get rich don't waste time trying to sell to every person in the country, just the easiest half.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Nope... Vox isn't News either.
Because newspapers are in the memory business, expect newsstands to be stocked with some grim and melancholy covers. Because Trump is selling amnestia, expect him to attack the newspapers.
Here’s a selection:
https://qz.com/902802/magazine-covers-about-donald-trump-are-getting-d
ark-businessweek-the-new-yorker-the-economist-der-spiegel-time-mother-jones-the-atlantic/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:53% of Americans agreed Congress should investigate contact between Russia and President Donald Trump's inner circle believed to have happened before the election.
Originally posted by G:
It's not unreasonable to think if he continues on this path it will get even worse. It's early - but I believe he will hang himself eventually. I think it's up to how much the traditional conservatives hate him.
The Republican Congressional majority does NOT want to investigate. They think that if they stall long enough Americans will forget about Trump. But Trump keeps unwisely reminding Americans why they should not forget.
www.businessinsider.com/poll-trump-russia-congress-investigation-2017-
2
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump would not be US president without the votes of many, including Obamacare enrollees and immigrants, who are likely to find themselves worse off because of his policies. To some Democrat supporters, this widespread voting against self-interests can seem impossible to understand. It makes perfect sense to Molly Crockett, a neuroscientist and experimental psychologist at Oxford University.
Crockett studies the psychology and has found that, rather than accept what they see as an unfair deal, people will often choose to punish others—even at a personal cost to themselves. This desire to punish, she believes, can motivate those who feel they’re getting a bad deal to vote against the political establishment, regardless of whether the alternative is truly a better option.
A classic way of studying the human desire to punish is through lab variations of the “ultimatum game.” In this set-up, one player is given money and has the option of splitting it with a second player. That second player can accept the portion of money offered or reject it. If they reject it, neither player gets a penny.
This experiment has been studied for close to 40 years and researchers have found that if the first player offers the second less than 30% of the total sum, most second players will see that as an unfair deal and reject it. They’ll forgo all money themselves in order to punish the first player.
Crockett sees the popular support for Trump and Brexit as real-world examples of the punishing behavior she observes in the lab.
https://qz.com/916680
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by G:
Millions of people don't want to overthrow democracy. They want Trump impeached. I believe that is part of democracy. He was not a popular vote election winner.
Unfortunately for them, he is. Because Wikileaks. Smartmatic. Sanders. Venezuela. Chavez. China. Lord Mark Malloch-Brown. Soros.
Use the google. That's far too much information to ask someone source just because some reader doesn't know. Everyone knows how to use the internet.
Because of cheating Bernie, she became our candidate, tried to cheat Trump, did cheat, but lost. We lost that election 59:41, because we had a traitor as a candidate.
If people love democracy, why weren't they up in arms over Sanders' defeat? It was a known fraud long before the election.
Not, mind you, that I love Sanders. Look at my years on the board decrying the evils of socialism, National Socialism, Soviet Socialism, Maoist Socialism, and all of their little spinoffs. In like 100 threads.
But I voted for him anyway, because I think he told the truth.
2nd, 6,
Ivanka is married to a Russian. That's all the connection you need. Okay, he's a pro-Russian president, like GHW Bush, FDR, and most of the people before him.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
OK too much to unravel there. Some makes no sense, some is untrue and some is. And people did raise a stink about what happened to Sanders. Many decided not to vote and stayed home. I heard it discussed in the press all the time.
Quote:
Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:Quote:
Originally posted by G:
Millions of people don't want to overthrow democracy. They want Trump impeached. I believe that is part of democracy. He was not a popular vote election winner.
Unfortunately for them, he is. Because Wikileaks. Smartmatic. Sanders. Venezuela. Chavez. China. Lord Mark Malloch-Brown. Soros.
Use the google. That's far too much information to ask someone source just because some reader doesn't know. Everyone knows how to use the internet.
Because of cheating Bernie, she became our candidate, tried to cheat Trump, did cheat, but lost. We lost that election 59:41, because we had a traitor as a candidate.
If people love democracy, why weren't they up in arms over Sanders' defeat? It was a known fraud long before the election.
Not, mind you, that I love Sanders. Look at my years on the board decrying the evils of socialism, National Socialism, Soviet Socialism, Maoist Socialism, and all of their little spinoffs. In like 100 threads.
But I voted for him anyway, because I think he told the truth.
2nd, 6,
Ivanka is married to a Russian. That's all the connection you need. Okay, he's a pro-Russian president, like GHW Bush, FDR, and most of the people before him.
---------------------
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
2nd,
He made it there without my vote.
There's a simpler answer: we had a terrible candidate.
Si Shen, ??
A protest would have been more to the point. Karmically, it cost us the election. Not the fact that I didn't vote for HRC, because that would have been a disaster. But why even protest so you can get HRC? I didn't vote for Trump, but even I can see that he's closer to Sanders than Clinton is. But we can do better. And should. Which means try harder, and don't let someone steal your nomination, and don't for the love of God, blame Russia for what's clearly our own damned fault.
Also, nice way to Snopes my post "not true," "partly true." Ya pick that one up from Trump in the debates?Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Whoa. Too much. Makes no sense. Wrong. Partially wrong. Totally wrong. Ya fired!
People rose a stink about Sanders. It was yuge! I heard it. Second heard it.
Discussed all over the press. All the time. @failing NYT
There, fixed that for ya 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I see you too think it is OK to quote something after changing the content, and therefor its context, very sad. What I meant by wrong was your input about Burnie, and I stated as much. There was a big stink about what the DNC did to him, and still is. That's only a difference of opinion.
Second, I voted for Hilary because and only because, Trump was a nightmare.
And lastly, Some of your post, especially the first part, was as though you were speaking to a post gone by and not what you quoted. Sort of like posting a picture after what's posted above that does nothing but confuse.
You take offense way to easily and it shows in the way you responded to me.
The Reaper yes. I saw what was going on in Real World Thread and was pushed to be very clear. Truth will be met with truth, and that I would respond to trolls harshly. That's because with my very first post came the attacks and his friends followed suite.
Quote:
Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:
2nd,
He made it there without my vote.
There's a simpler answer: we had a terrible candidate.
Si Shen, ??
A protest would have been more to the point. Karmically, it cost us the election. Not the fact that I didn't vote for HRC, because that would have been a disaster. But why even protest so you can get HRC? I didn't vote for Trump, but even I can see that he's closer to Sanders than Clinton is. But we can do better. And should. Which means try harder, and don't let someone steal your nomination, and don't for the love of God, blame Russia for what's clearly our own damned fault.
Also, nice way to Snopes my post "not true," "partly true." Ya pick that one up from Trump in the debates?Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Whoa. Too much. Makes no sense. Wrong. Partially wrong. Totally wrong. Ya fired!
People rose a stink about Sanders. It was yuge! I heard it. Second heard it.
Discussed all over the press. All the time. @failing NYT
There, fixed that for ya
---------------------
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME