Russia's and Assad's War Crimes in Syria

POSTED BY: kpo
UPDATED: Monday, September 8, 2025 15:48
VIEWED: 105502
PAGE 56 of 87

It's not even 8PM CST, Cunts.

WTF are you?

NO respect for mindless and subservient Cunts, at least not now!




If CUNT isn't for you, watch 7 minutes of Deadwood saying Cocksuker if that is more aligned with your sensibilites.



Love me or Hate me, I will kill you for coming at me or even my neighborhood if I'm not passed out.


I had to buy new rat traps last night.

I thought it was raining last night when I woke up to "noise" in one of my basement walls.

I'm actually FULL of empathy, especially for animals, as some of you who know me for long know will agree.



What a Cocksucker.....

I hate doing it.

I actually have seen some MASSIVE Wolf Spiders in my basement that would not be "agreeable" at all if I were married....

I kind of like watching them hunt, TBH....

This last one I saw was scary as fuck. Over 2" big.

He stamped out in the middle of a room in my basement, and for that night, that was his hunting ground.

I figured, if He got that big and bold, how many lesser Cunts has he fed off of?




Understand that about me.

I let 2-3 Inch Wolf Spiders live side-to-side with me in my PAID house....

They don't bother me.

I'm not immune to "scary" bugs though....

Millipedes and Centepedes and "Ear Wigs" are horrifying to me.



I don't need the Orkin Man.

That 3 inch Wolf Spider takes care of all of them, including the Web-Making spiders.


I don't know the actual life expectancy of a Wolf Spider, and any rare time I saw a badass one it was likely a kid of a kid or whatever....

But until I finish my entire house and pay for a yearly Orkin Man, all I can say for sure is that as far as "Incects" go, The Wolf Spider is It....


And/Or, if there were ever an insect that someday became "Sentient" and demanded Fealty, the Wolf Spider would be it.

They are your live in maids for free.



But holy fuck they're about to die if your Wife wakes up and sees what they do "behind closed doors"


They are scary as fuck looking, especially when huge, but they have very little venom that coud hurt US, even though they never bother to make a WEB and camp out in the middle of a room and decend on their prey like Lone Wolves...

They're actually "Fearless" or they just don't give a fuck about anything. I know because I spent countless miutes-to-hours harassing them, without hitting them.


Unless you're going to "trap and release" a Wolf Spider, don't bother being kind if your final move was to squash it.

You could beat on the basement tiles .001" from Him or Her and they wont budge.




They rarely scope out a "Human Place".

The very rare times they do, at least in my experience, is because they are HUGE...


Sometimes I used to "play" with them, and alhthough i ne3ver paid anyonem I self-removed them, but these days I stay out of it...



Maybe I'm crazy?

I'm not a Cat Lady and I throw shit out...


The ABSOLUTE BEST of the crafty Kats would be lucky to have me.


Who kows?

I'm a Dog person, but I don't commit to it.


I have very much loved several cats in my past.




You didn't need the Orkin Man last week, but you do now.

You either smashed the fuck out of that Wof Spidler at HER behest, or you caught it and set it free.

Proove your a Man!!!!

Kill the Alpha Wolf Spiders and sit back and watch while She wonders why there are a half a million more bugs she needs to Pay to Kill that she didn't have to last week....

We Came, We Saw, He Died! HAHAHA




It's a trade-off....


We're not best friends, but at least he's not a Hillary Cunt


Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

I'm glad that you said something KPO...


Even if I had to actively reach over 7 pages of bullshit to talk to you.



I am not the "baromeer" of any side you should subscribe too.

That doesn't mean that I should be ignored, especialy since I called this election over 2 years ago and never wavered.



It's not racist.


3 year old kids Loved Trump and hated Hilary.





Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Fear in Aleppo as Assad and Russia launch most intense bombing yet:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-38007980


"Objective truths are established by evidence. Personal truths by faith. Political truths by incessant repetition."

Russia's and Assad's War Crimes in Syria - http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60278
Evidence the Syrian regime sponsors ISIS - http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60521

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

More "pro-terrorist media":

Medecins Sans Frontieres, international aid organisation on Assad and Putin's latest bombing campaign in east Aleppo:

Quote:

---

Syria: Multiple direct and indirect hits on hospitals in east Aleppo in the last 48 hours

The only specialised paediatric hospital in besieged east Aleppo has come under attack for the second time since airstrikes resumed on 15 November, destroying three floors and leaving it out of service. Three other hospitals have also taken direct hits, resulting in casualties among staff and patients and leaving two key surgical hospitals and the largest general hospital out of service.

“This is a dark day for east Aleppo. The severity of the bombing has inflicted huge damage on the few hospitals working around the clock to provide medical care,” says Teresa Sancristoval, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) emergency coordinator. “The attacks have destroyed entire hospitals, electric generators, emergency rooms and wards, forcing them to stop all medical activities. It is not only MSF that condemns indiscriminate attacks on civilians or civilian infrastructure, including hospitals, but also humanitarian law. The message is simple and I don´t know how to say it any louder: stop bombing hospitals.”

“The children’s hospital has sustained damage for a second time from airstrikes,” says Luis Montial, MSF deputy head of mission for Syria. “This is the only hospital exclusively for children in the besieged area and it is now out of action. The consequences of indiscriminate bombing are very clear: more lives lost, medical services depleted and insurmountable suffering for people trapped by the siege. What is not clear is how much longer the health system, already on its knees, can carry on functioning unless the bombing stops and medical supplies are allowed in.”

East Aleppo’s hospitals have been hit by bombs in more than 30 separate attacks since the siege started in July. All of east Aleppo’s hospitals are supported by MSF, among other organisations.

---

http://www.msf.org/en/article/syria-multiple-direct-and-indirect-hits-
hospitals-east-aleppo-last-48-hours


"Objective truths are established by evidence. Personal truths by faith. Political truths by incessant repetition."

Russia's and Assad's War Crimes in Syria - http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60278
Evidence the Syrian regime sponsors ISIS - http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60521

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Multiple direct and indirect hits on hospitals in east Aleppo in the last 48 hours

The only specialised paediatric hospital in besieged east Aleppo has come under attack for the second time since airstrikes resumed on 15 November, destroying three floors and leaving it out of service. Three other hospitals have also taken direct hits, resulting in casualties among staff and patients and leaving two key surgical hospitals and the largest general hospital out of service.

---

I thought - according to other western sources - there were no more functioning hospitals in east Aleppo?

How many times can one "destroy" a hospital? Quite a few, apparently. These must be "zombie" hospitals!




-----------

"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

I thought - according to other western sources - there were no more functioning hospitals in east Aleppo?

---

I've already explained this to you, and it's not rocket science. Assad and Putin bomb the hospitals, the people rebuild them to get them back into working order (what choice do they have?). Assad and Putin bomb them again.

The World Health Organisation (another terrorist mouthpiece) also describe the bombings:

Quote:

---

Some of the heaviest bombardment so far on Aleppo has left rebel-held parts of the Syrian city virtually without medical facilities, observers say.

The World Health Organization says all makeshift hospitals there are out of service, after five days of air and artillery strikes by government forces.

...

Medics have in the past been able to bring field hospitals back into operation after strikes, but the lack of supplies is now so severe that this is becoming harder, Reuters news agency reports.

---

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-38039282

Don't let these blatant war crimes stop your cheerleading for Assad and Putin though Siggy.




"Objective truths are established by evidence. Personal truths by faith. Political truths by incessant repetition."

Russia's and Assad's War Crimes in Syria - http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60278
Evidence the Syrian regime sponsors ISIS - http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60521

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

And don't let me stop YOU from cheerleading for terrorists, KRAPO.

It's not Assad or the Russians who are keeping people inside of eastern Aleppo, KRAPO. It's the terrorists, whom I have quoted here, doing that all on their own. It's not Assad or Russia preventing aid from entering Aleppo, it's the terrorists ("neighborhood councils", "White Helmets", and the various factions of al Qaida/al Nusra and other Sunni extremists), whom I have quoted here, doing that all on their own.

Now, there is a city which is kettled by the terrorists, and they are in essence holding civilians hostage. When Israel bombs schools in Gaza to get at Hamas, you're all for it. Israel doesn't negotiate with terrorists. And the USA policy is that "we don't negotiate with terrorists" either. Should Assad?

So first of all, I take news from east Aleppo with a HUGE dose of salt. Given that the extremists are adamant about not allowing the remaining populace (which is probably 30,000, not 250,000) access to the internet, every piece of information coming our way is heavily filtered thru the extremists. False accusations, false flags, staged events made for video are part of the information war. It costs them NOTHING to accuse Assad and Russia of everything, and many of the accusations have turned out to be clearly false. Stop being so gullible.

In this particular case, the "news" that you reported IS WRONG IN THE MOST BASIC INFORMATION, and I will let you figure out what is wrong with it.





-----------

"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Scrolling up, KRAPO, I see that you cite one of the most deeply flawed "reporting" networks, SNHR, as a source of "who killed whom".

SNHR is fundamentally a western intelligence mouthpiece, a 2-man operation with no ties to on-the-ground Syrians, and no better than the SOHR (a one-man band funded by George Soros with equal lack of on-the-ground Syrian contacts).

SNHR's casualty numbers are, in a word, "incredible". But don't take my word for it, here is someone who has looked at their methodology closely

Quote:

---

The Syrian Network for Human Rights (not to be confused with SOHR) is one of the most cited and prominient organizations documenting SCW casualties and human rights violations. Sadly, "cited and prominient" doesn't mean "credible".

SNHR has published their methodology on how they document deaths. This methodology is, in my opinion, deeply flawed and here I will explain why.

Methodology

Well, here is their methodology. It consists of three steps. At the first step, they gather reports from activists on the ground. At the second, their documentation team checks that reports are not repeated and match related news. If I understood them correctly, they try to get at least two reports for each death. The third step is just filing into database. There is a fourth step, but it's just a part of the third.

I'm sure you all see the main problem with this methodology: there is no verification. They get a report or two saying that "this civilian man died to a barrel bomb", and they file him as a civilian victim of government. Even if he was a victim of Ahrar vs YPG clash and died to grenade misfire while trying to blast some Kurds, for example.

Another obvious problem is an activist distribution. Some areas have higher reporting activity, some lower. As their activists are mainly in rebel-held areas (well, most likely. SNHR gives no info on activists distribution at all, a sin to the sacred art of statistics), the bias follows.

SNHR flat out refuses to accept any information from government or state media. While not entirely unjustified, this is still cherry picking as they have no reason to not file someone just because he was reported by SANA instead of their activists. If SANA presents name and photos just as their activists do (well, they present a reason not to, but it was just one mistake and one mistake is not a good reason to exclude the whole group of sources entirely).

Strange numbers
03.11 - 10.15:
"Civilians killed by regime: 180879, children killed by regime: 18851
SNHR explicitly states that women and children casualty rate indicates deliberate targeting civilians. But here we see that ~10% of civilians casualties are children. They don't state women rate, but going by their other reports, it's even lower. So it's 20% women and children at max.

[For a comparison to non-Syrian casualties ...] According to Iraq Body Count, women and children accounted for almost 20% of all civilian deaths in 2003-2005. This report doesn't say what was women and children casualty rate of US forces strikes, but it does say that "children were disproportionately affected by all explosive devices but most severely by air strikes and unexploded ordnance (including cluster bomblets)", so I assume that it was about the same. ... by using SNHR methodology, US forces "deliberately targeted civilians", which is, most likely, not true. Also, in pre-war Syria, women and children contributed to about 65% of population - just another fact to think about.

Death under torture by: ISIS - 22, Rebels - 15, Nusra - 12
Really? They are Daesh, al-Quaeda and a bunch of groups including JaI and AaS.
November 2015:
RuAF: 259 civilians, 7 gunmen
Coalition AF: 13 civilians, 0 gunmen
Kurdish Self Management Forces (YPG?): 17 civilians, 0 gunmen

SNHR isn't even trying, is it?

Presentation
SNHR often presents percentages of people killed by diff

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME