America's own "color revolution" brought to you by George Soros. And Georgia (nation) a 2024 example of another color revolution in the making.
POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 22:32
VIEWED: 5710
PAGE 2 of 3
Quote:I'll start.
I'm looking for an intellectual agreement on what we have in common. ... where our mutual self-interest lies.
Originally this country was founded by rich businessmen trying to avoid paying taxes to the King. 'no taxation without representation' Since they were pretty sure the King wasn't going to allow them representation, it was used as an casus belli to incite a revolution. It was about profit ... wrapped in the camouflage of freedom for the masses. As such, their definition of democracy and who got to participate in it was limited. Men, but not women; free people, not indentured servants or slaves; landholders, not poor people or workers ... and so on. In other words, 'democracy' meant rule by rich, free, white men, much like themselves.
I'd like to think this country has grown beyond those very limited views.
So when I think of what we have in common - as a country - it's the mutual benefit of all the flesh and blood people of the country. Not democrats or republicans, whites or blacks, men or women, young or old, rich or poor - all people. And not phony 'people' like corporations, and especially NOT transnational corporations.
How did your beloved 'democratic' party fuck up so badly?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Where'd that come from? It wasn't 'occupy democrats'.
How did your beloved 'democratic' party fuck up so badly?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There is an "occupy democrats" website and FB page...
http://occupydemocrats.com/
It is full of bullshit. You should see it.
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I went there before I posted - looked at it - looked around for the posters that supposedly were put out by 'occupy d'. I didn't find the posters, so they are just the normal "quoted" made-up lies and bullshit that are so prevalent here. otoh the website seems to be run by people who drank their own kool-aid.
So, not saying one side is right and the other wrong - just saying that I don't appreciate lies posted by anyone to further any cause.
How did your beloved 'democratic' party fuck up so badly?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
It sounds to me as if you think Trump is engineering the chaos. First of all, why would Trump, of all people, want "payback" for Ukraine? Why would Trump, of all people, want to tear this nation apart? He's President-elect; creating the kind of chaos you envision would make this country ungovernable. The only people who have an interest in tearing the USA apart are the people who've never had the USA's interests at heart to begin with, and who have had lots and lots of practice at creating chaos.- SIGNY
Your assumptions are as usual, way off base. I know, I know, you do that on purpose so you can make a completely unrelated point - check. -G
G, YOU POSTED
Quote:
I agree that both parties suck, that opinion has been around for a good long while. I believe you are dreaming and setting the stage for payback for what you think happened in Ukraine.-G
I'm "setting the stage" for "payback"?
Dood, I don't have that kind of power!
I can barely set the table at home because nobody keeps it clear!
And if it's not ME who is "setting the stage", who is? Trump?
And if that's not your point, what is your point?
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
G, this seems to be another pointless point
Quote:I said, "had become". They weren't here when the Podesta files were released, exposing the Clinton's "pay to play" schemes and the DNC's rigging of the primaries. I know that for Frem medical care was a huge necessity, so maybe he would have opted to stick with Hillary. As for the others, it's hard to say.
Pretty sure they [FREM, ANTHONY, HKCAVALIER, CITIZEN, KWICKO] would react like Mal4 did - gob smacked at what you've become.
I think they would be gobsmacked what the Democratic Party has become.- SIGNY
They already knew what the democratic party was
Quote:No, it's just that it's kind of ridiculous to put words in other people's mouths, especially when they're not here to set the record straight.
so so that's just another Siggy 2-step dodge.- G
Quote:
About you supporting Trump? Or is Trump just the stepping stone?
"Stepping stone" to WHAT?
A place in Trump's cabinet?
World domination?
This "stepping stone" concept sounds like me "setting the stage" for ... well, anything. I have no special contacts, and I'm for sure not in power anywhere. I have no special future. The only thing I can do is vote and express my opinion, just like everybody else. I have a regular job, and I like the way CA is going (for the most part) so except for a few specific Trump campaign promises (which I've already detailed) I'm voting for policies that are somewhat contradictory to Trump.
So, again - what's your point???
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The rioting liberals may think that they're defending against ... something ... but the reality is that
FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ELITE, THIS IS JUST ABOUT LOSING POWER AND TRYING TO REGAIN IT. AND FOR THE GLOBALISTS, THIS IS ABOUT DESTROYING NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY.
People just aren't realistic enough! 
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
So another dodge - disappointing but not surprising. Maybe you feel honesty is a weakness? A liability? If you hadn't railed against many of the posters here by lamenting that in the past there were posters who were "more interesting and more intelligent" you might get away with that side step. By saying what you did you obviously felt you knew them well enough and wished they were here now. But in the real now, you've chosen to act like you don't really know them at all. The reasons are obvious. Signym as usual.
I didn't say THEY WOULD AGREE WITH ME. I said they were more "interesting and more intelligent", which means we would have had a more substantive discussion. I have had really intense discussions with people that disagreed with me, like GEEZER and SARGEX. Others like FREM and BYTE and DREAMTROVE and even PN brought ideas to the board I hadn't even thought of.
In fact, it was a discussion with BYTEMITE (IIRC) that switched me to supporting nationalism instead of globalism, it just flipped a switch in my brain.
Instead, I'm trying to address your "points" which, to be honest, seem more like insinuations. Insinuations that I'm "setting the table for payback" and that this is just a "stepping stone" to ...???
Really? I can't even figure out what you're trying to say, much less "dodge" it!
But feel free to clarify your points.
Here's a hint: The topic is George Soros, who is a globalist and who has contributed to destabilizing many nations around the globe, possibly including the USA. (Canada too, prolly).
Are the organizations which are inciting demonstrations funded by Soros?
Do you think that riots are a suitable political expression?
Were there equivalent riots after the Obama elections?
What is globalism versus nationalism, and what do you think are the benefits and downsides of one versus another.
There is lots to discuss.
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME