Will the Next Election Be Hacked?
POSTED BY: FutureMrsFIllion
UPDATED: Friday, September 6, 2024 03:28
VIEWED: 10966
PAGE 8 of 9
Quote:
AURaptor wrote:
it's poisoning the well by flatly stating voter intimidation WILL be out there, so be ready for a fight. How about ' Go to your poll, vote, go home. '. But no, the Dems can't allow for that. There MUST be civil unrest. WHY? It fits the Dems's template that America IS racists, and we're no better off now than we were in the 1920's. THAT is pattently BULLSHIT!
"AG: Voter warning linked to GOP campaign"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061019/ap_on_re_us/immigration_voting_thr
eat_6
Quote:
SANTA ANA, Calif. - State investigators have linked a Republican campaign to letters sent to thousands of Orange County Hispanics warning them they could go to jail or be deported if they vote next month, a spokesman for the attorney general said.
Oh yeah, there is nothing to those allegations of voter intimidation. Only 14,000 legal Democratic voters recieved these letters. There is nothing dirty about that, other than it being a crime...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Will the Next Election Be Hacked?
Is that even a question?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
For those of us who give a damn, HBO is running a doc. tonight titled "Hacking Democracy" @ 9 PM.
http://www.hbo.com/docs/programs/hackingdemocracy/synopsis.html
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Voting experts say it is impossible to say how many votes were not counted that should have been. But in Florida alone, the discrepancies reported across Sarasota County and three others amount to more than 60,000 votes. In Colorado, as many as 20,000 people gave up trying to vote, election officials say, as new online systems for verifying voter registrations crashed repeatedly. And in Arkansas, election officials tallied votes three times in one county, and each time the number of ballots cast changed by more than 30,000.
Published on Sunday, November 26, 2006 by the New York Times
available at http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1126-07.htm
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
before we can accuse the right of the dirty tricks, Flordia, DieBold Machine....try read Greg's Best Democracy Money Can Buy
Now the Scandal Comes From the LeftWing, Have the Neo-Liberals now become the extreme
People are fooled by the left vs right, the blue vs red
but in the end its the small higher elite vs a mass of American citizens...same shit all over the world now
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Sorry. Fox is NOT a legitimate news source. They just aren't.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Sorry. Fox is NOT a legitimate news source. They just aren't.
Right you are, and I don't hold out much hope for them becoming one in the foreseeable future.
____________________________________________
Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Instead of disputing the point, reject the source.
That is THUGR'S and KPO's and GSTRING's favorite dodge. Yours too, apparently.
So when the NYT carried GWB's water about WMD, did you stop reading the NYT?
When CNN and MSNBC uncritically licked Hillary's broad behind, did you stop reading or listening to them?
Even SNOPES shows a demonstrable bias: Instead of disputing the data or the statistical method of the paper which demonstrated that voting districts with audit trails favored Bernie, and those without audit rails favored Hillary. Snopes quibbled about whether it was an "official" paper from Stanford or not. Really???
For me, the most important fact about the vote-rigging in 2000 and 2004 was how the Democrats did NOT make an issue of it. There was no public move to disallow certain voting types, or to REQUIRE an independent paper audit. I concluded at the time is because the DNC thought it could be useful for them too.
We should be voting on paper, and hand=counting the ballots under observation. All this non-transparent voting technologies does is ensure that whoever is in charge of the voting machines gets to control the outcome.
"It's not who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes"
Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?
G, THUGR, MAL4: Oh BTW, please define intelligence.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60903&p=4#1
018100
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Sorry. Fox is NOT a legitimate news source. They just aren't.
Right you are, and I don't hold out much hope for them becoming one in the foreseeable future.
____________________________________________
Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719
CNN's Wolf Blitzer
Smartmatic is not owned by Soros....that seems to be part of the 'conspiracy' but is owned by Lord Mark Malloch-Brown. He is connected to Soros through the Open Society Foundation, a kind of open borders group or an organization that gives grants to civil society organizations around the world.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Instead of disputing the point, reject the source.
Post of the week. Might be the intro to "How to Avoid Critical Thinking" after getting your booster shot of the Facts Vaccine.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME