Jill Stein says Hillary's foreign policy is "scarier" than Trump's

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Thursday, August 7, 2025 04:40
VIEWED: 4153
PAGE 2 of 3

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 NEXT PAGE

THGRRI

Monday, October 17, 2016 10:36 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
More detail from Jill Stein. I guess she's a "commie troll" too.

So you're a Jill Stein fan and you give what she says a lot of credence. Can you enlighten the rest of us as to why?

____________________________________________

Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719

KPO

Monday, October 17, 2016 10:46 PM

Quote:
More detail from Jill Stein. I guess she's a "commie troll" too.

Useful idiot is the term. It goes for any of the hypocritical far-left who fawn over Putin while claiming to care about "peace".

"Objective truths are established by evidence. Personal truths by faith. Political truths by incessant repetition."

Russia's and Assad's War Crimes in Syria - http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60278
Evidence the Syrian regime sponsors ISIS - http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60521

THGRRI

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 12:22 AM

Closure of Russia Today bank accounts nothing to do with us – Treasury
British government denies role in NatWest closing bank accounts of Moscow’s main propaganda tool in English-speaking world

“We have recently undertaken a review of your banking arrangements with us and reached the conclusion that we will no longer provide these facilities,” it said. The decision was final, the letter added.

But after several hours of confusion the Treasury said it had nothing to do with NatWest’s move. Sources said the decision to deny RT banking services was made independently by NatWest, and apparently without any official consultation."

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/17/russia-todays-uk-bank-ac
counts-frozen-says-editor

____________________________________________

Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719

1KIKI

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 12:31 AM

There are many, many problems with hillary. She breaks countries and starts wars wherever she goes. Right now, she and obama are drumming up war fever JUST TO WIN THE ELECTION. Never mind that it's not against some small hapless country full of brown people that most voters can't find on a map. No, hillary and obama are aiming a Russia, a fully capable nuclear equal. I wonder if they've considered that the Russian response to their war-mongering might be something they can't just turn off after the election.

hillary as a president would have zero power to keep her many, many empty promises. And she knows that, but it doesn't stop her from making them anyway. And that's because people (you listening second and sgg?) really are that gullible. So, why not lie? Who's going to notice? (Certainly not second and sgg!) But even more than that, hillary herself doesn't believe them, as the leaked documents show. hillary is an empty husk of a person when it comes to integrity.

hillary is completely corrupt, mixing state power with personal gain, as the leaked emails about pay-to-play as Secy of State and her toadying speeches to GS show.

And there's the billary issue - co-abusers of women and children, equal, if not worse than anyone else on the campaign trail.

But the BIGGEST problem with hillary is her finger on the nuclear button. Having left Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria in unfixable smoking ruins, and unable to admit or even understand that she was wrong, she'll be surrounded by her equally deluded neocons in the State Department, military and CIA who also think a nuclear war is winnable (you listening, 'g', thugger and kpo?). Oblivious to her own evident failures - that anyone with half a brain, the slightest shred of honesty, and a baby toe in reality knows (do you really think Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria are successes?), deaf to warnings, she'd turn her attention toward Russia - with her bloated fat finger on the nuclear button, and US policy to launch nuclear weapons FIRST in her obese waddling hip pocket.

Given her unblemished history of failure, I can't imagine anything could possibly go wrong.

Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

SIGNYM

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:02 AM

Quote:
Useful idiot is the term. It goes for any of the hypocritical far-left who fawn over Putin while claiming to care about "peace".

If you could show how Dr Stein or I have "fawned over Putin" then you might have a point. But you can't, so you don't.

Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?

THGRRI

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:32 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
More detail from Jill Stein. I guess she's a "commie troll" too.

Quote:
THG
So you're a Jill Stein fan and you give what she says a lot of credence. Can you enlighten the rest of us as to why?

Waiting
___________________________________________

Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719

1KIKI

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:34 AM

There are many, many problems with hillary. She breaks countries and starts wars wherever she goes. Right now, she and obama are drumming up war fever JUST TO WIN THE ELECTION. Never mind that it's not against some small hapless country full of brown people that most voters can't find on a map. No, hillary and obama are aiming a Russia, a fully capable nuclear equal. I wonder if they've considered that the Russian response to their war-mongering might be something they can't just turn off after the election.

hillary as a president would have zero power to keep her many, many empty promises. And she knows that, but it doesn't stop her from making them anyway. And that's because people (you listening second and sgg?) really are that gullible. So, why not lie? Who's going to notice? (Certainly not second and sgg!) But even more than that, hillary herself doesn't believe them, as the leaked documents show. hillary is an empty husk of a person when it comes to integrity.

hillary is completely corrupt, mixing state power with personal gain, as the leaked emails about pay-to-play as Secy of State and her toadying speeches to GS show.

And there's the billary issue - co-abusers of women and children, equal, if not worse than anyone else on the campaign trail.

But the BIGGEST problem with hillary is her finger on the nuclear button. Having left Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria in unfixable smoking ruins, and unable to admit or even understand that she was wrong, she'll be surrounded by her equally deluded neocons in the State Department, military and CIA who also think a nuclear war is winnable (you listening, 'g', thugger and kpo?). Oblivious to her own evident failures - that anyone with half a brain, the slightest shred of honesty, and a baby toe in reality knows (do you really think Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria are successes?), deaf to warnings, she'd turn her attention toward Russia - with her bloated fat finger on the nuclear button, and US policy to launch nuclear weapons FIRST in her obese waddling hip pocket.

Given her unblemished history of failure, I can't imagine anything could possibly go wrong.

Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

THGRRI

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:40 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:

There are many, many problems with hillary. She breaks countries and starts wars wherever she goes. Right now, she and obama are drumming up war fever JUST TO WIN THE ELECTION. Never mind that it's not against some small hapless country full of brown people that most voters can't find on a map. No, hillary and obama are aiming a Russia, a fully capable nuclear equal. I wonder if they've considered that the Russian response to their war-mongering might be something they can't just turn off after the election.

hillary as a president would have zero power to keep her many, many empty promises. And she knows that, but it doesn't stop her from making them anyway. And that's because people (you listening second and sgg?) really are that gullible. So, why not lie? Who's going to notice? (Certainly not second and sgg!) But even more than that, hillary herself doesn't believe them, as the leaked documents show. hillary is an empty husk of a person when it comes to integrity.

hillary is completely corrupt, mixing state power with personal gain, as the leaked emails about pay-to-play as Secy of State and her toadying speeches to GS show.

And there's the billary issue - co-abusers of women and children, equal, if not worse than anyone else on the campaign trail.

But the BIGGEST problem with hillary is her finger on the nuclear button. Having left Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria in unfixable smoking ruins, and unable to admit or even understand that she was wrong, she'll be surrounded by her equally deluded neocons in the State Department, military and CIA who also think a nuclear war is winnable (you listening, 'g', thugger and kpo?). Oblivious to her own evident failures - that anyone with half a brain, the slightest shred of honesty, and a baby toe in reality knows (do you really think Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria are successes?), deaf to warnings, she'd turn her attention toward Russia - with her bloated fat finger on the nuclear button, and US policy to launch nuclear weapons FIRST in her obese waddling hip pocket.

Given her unblemished history of failure, I can't imagine anything could possibly go wrong.

Canadian Foreign Minister: NATO tries to deter Russian aggression, seeks dialogue with Moscow

”It`s not my strategy, it`s that of NATO and our allies. Everybody is doing that, except Canada in the past — but not anymore. All of the NATO members are collectively making sure we have strong deterrence against the behavior of Russia that is unacceptable, but at the same time, [seeking] strong dialogue in order to avoid the escalation,” he said.

http://uaposition.com/latest-news/canadian-Foreign-Minister-nato-tries
-to-deter-russian-aggression-seeks-dialogue-with-moscow-2/

____________________________________________

Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719

1KIKI

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 3:01 AM

A Russia Today studio in Moscow.
British Bank Abruptly Drops Russian Network RT’s Accounts
By NEIL MacFARQUHAR and KIMIKO DE FREYTAS-TAMURA 12:35 PM ET

The state-financed network, also known as Russia Today, suggested that NatWest’s decision hindered its freedom of speech, though critics consider RT a Kremlin mouthpiece.

The rebel leader Arsen Pavlov, also known as Motorola, married Elena Kolenkina in Donetsk, eastern Ukraine, in 2014.

Bomb Kills Pro-Russian Rebel Commander in Eastern Ukraine

US, UK Threaten Sanctions Over Russian Hacking

US Claims Russian Bombing 'War Crime'

Apparently the translation for the US words 'talks' and 'negotiations' are 'accusations' and 'ultimatums'.

Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 5:15 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

Sounds like a reasonable woman.
Hillary's foreign policy exposes the fact that she knows less about Benghazi than Gary Johnson knows about Aleppo.

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 NEXT PAGE