TRUMP - Just because.....................Naw, I just can't say it!
POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Monday, March 9, 2026 20:06
VIEWED: 244478
PAGE 69 of 170
second
Trump’s Behavior Similar To Male Chimpanzee, Says Jane Goodall. Well, she’s the expert.
How DOES this fix Clinton's loss of support?
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
second
She needs the revealing moment from Dead Zone (1983)
Are you saying that only a fictitious scenario (that will never happen in real life, I might add) can help Hillary now? Is that what you think?
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
In a Quinnipiac poll from last week, Clinton over Trump by a 55-34 margin from likely voters 18-34.
But when Stein and Johnson were included, as they will be in the real election, Clinton received 31 percent, Trump 26 percent. Johnson came in second with 29 percent and Stein 15 percent. Among people who are left of center, Jill Stein is an obvious choice if Hillary Clinton isn't your cup of tea. But Gary Johnson doesn't make any sense at all for Left-wingers. He wants to repeal Obamacare, slash Social Security, supports Citizens United, and doesn't want to do anything about climate change. He's a pretty ripe target for Hillary to get votes from his left-wing supporters who know only that Johnson is for legalizing marijuana.
www.qu.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/national/release
-detail?ReleaseID=2378
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
www.nytimes.com/2016/09/19/opinion/vote-as-if-it-matters.html?_r=0
Paul Krugman says 29 percent of millennials would cast their ballots now for a third party, but few know what it stands for.
Does it make sense to vote for Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate for president? Sure, as long as you believe two things. First, you have to believe that it makes no difference at all whether Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump moves into the White House — because one of them will. Second, you have to believe that America will be better off in the long run if we eliminate environmental regulation, abolish the income tax, do away with public schools, and dismantle Social Security and Medicare — which is what the Libertarian platform calls for.
But do 29 percent of Americans between 18 and 34 believe these things? I doubt it. Yet that, according to a recent Quinnipiac poll, is the share of millennial voters who say that they would vote for Johnson if the election took place now. And the preponderance of young Americans who say they’ll back Johnson or Jill Stein, the Green Party nominee, appear to be citizens who would support Clinton in a two-way race; including the minor party candidates cuts her margin among young voters from 21 points to just 5.
How many people have actually read the Libertarian platform? www.lp.org/platform
As I said, it calls for abolition of the income tax and the privatization of almost everything the government does, including education. If parents don’t want their children educated, or want them indoctrinated in a cult, or put them to work in a sweatshop instead of learning to read? Not our problem.
What really struck me, however, was what the platform says about the environment. It opposes any kind of regulation; instead, it argues that we can rely on the courts. Is a giant corporation poisoning the air you breathe or the water you drink? Just sue. Ordinary citizens against teams of high-priced corporate lawyers — what could go wrong?
It’s really hard to believe that young voters who supported Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primary think any of this is a good idea. But Johnson and Stein have received essentially no media scrutiny, so that voters have no idea what they stand for. And their parties’ names sound nice: who among us is against liberty? The truth, that the Libertarian Party essentially stands for a return to all the worst abuses of the Gilded Age, is not out there.
Meanwhile, of course, it does make a huge difference which of the two realistic prospects for the presidency wins, and not just because of the difference in their temperaments and the degree to which they respect or have contempt for democratic norms. Their policy positions are drastically different, too.
True, much of what Trump says is incoherent: In his policy proposals, trillion dollar tax breaks are here today, gone tomorrow, back the day after. But anyone who calls him a “populist” isn’t looking at the general thrust of his ideas, or at whom he has chosen as economic advisers. Trump’s brain trust, such as it is, is composed of hard-line, right-wing supply-siders — whom even Republican economists have called “charlatans and cranks” — for whom low taxes on the rich are the overwhelming priority.
Meanwhile, Clinton has staked out the most progressive policy positions ever advocated by a presidential candidate. There’s no reason to believe that these positions are insincere, that she would revert to 1990s policies in office: What some are now calling the “new liberal economics” has sunk deep roots in the Democratic Party, and dominates the ranks of Clinton’s advisers.
Now, maybe you don’t care. Maybe you consider center-left policies just as bad as hard-right policies. And maybe you have somehow managed to reconcile that disdain with tolerance for libertarian free-market mania. If so, by all means vote for Johnson. But don’t vote for a minor-party candidate to make a statement. Nobody cares.
Remember, George W. Bush lost the popular vote in 2000, but somehow ended up
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
www.gocomics.com/brewsterrockit/2016/09/20
http://doonesbury.washingtonpost.com/strip/archive/2016/9/18
Fat-Shaming Comes Back To Bite Trump
http://crooksandliars.com/2016/09/fat-shaming-comes-back-bite-trump-tw
itter
Has anyone ever seen Trump and Baron Harkonnen in the same room? Both have red hair. It would be careless not to speculate...
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
OOOooooooo, clever retort. Sounds like a Capital idea! Perhaps you can show me and lead the way; I'm like putty in your more-than-capable hands. Of course, showing the proper respect and genuflecting in the subordinate position.
Lead away, oh master and borderline genius!
SGG
Quote:This is how the RNC conducts business, like the Mafia, sign or else!
Originally posted by 1kiki:
sgg
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/rnc-chair-warns-2016-gop-candid
ates-over-trump-support/ar-BBwjutC?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
The fucking dickless prick "Rinse Frebush" couldn't run a lemonade stand, even with the stain running down his pants leg.
He is one of three fucking geniuses leading the charge towards the stupid of America. It's him, then Drumpf and LaPeePee from the NRA. Worthless scumbags, all of them.
That would be better directed at people who actually support them. Why don't you go post that on an RNC website? Or do they require that you use your real name?
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Nothing much is actually happening in this race. Hillary Clinton has had a fairly steady, yet tiny, 3.5 percent lead over Trump all year. Then she got a boost that wore off from the Democratic convention. The single most remarkable thing about the Clinton vs. Trump race is how stable it's been ever since the day Trump took his famous escalator ride down to the ground floor of Trump Tower to announce his candidacy.
Originally posted by 1kiki:
secondQuote:
She needs the revealing moment from Dead Zone (1983)
Are you saying that only a fictitious scenario (that will never happen in real life, I might add) can help Hillary now? Is that what you think?
http://election.princeton.edu/history-of-meta-analysis/
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrp
romo#now
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Allow me to retract my previous statement and submit the following: So, by your brilliant response, I take it you are supporting either Jill Stein or Gary Johnson/Bill Weld. I stand corrected and hereby withdraw the aforementioned comment. It was both childish and out of order. I apologize, unreservedly.
the ever humble
Except for "the ever humble" I was being sarcastic with my response. If we can't discuss things civilly, then I suggest keeping our distance.
(update Edit)
SGG
Quote:This is how the RNC conducts business, like the Mafia, sign or else!
Originally posted by 1kiki:
sgg
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/rnc-chair-warns-2016-gop-candid
ates-over-trump-support/ar-BBwjutC?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
The fucking dickless prick "Rinse Frebush" couldn't run a lemonade stand, even with the stain running down his pants leg.
He is one of three fucking geniuses leading the charge towards the stupid of America. It's him, then Drumpf and LaPeePee from the NRA. Worthless scumbags, all of them.
That would be better directed at people who actually support them. Why don't you go post that on an RNC website? Or do they require that you use your real name?
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yep. My bubbly fucking charm! I just feel good and fucking nasty right now!
Can't stop the emotion, must......get....back.....into.......my....
You assume that my "fuck-you attitude" is due to drunkenness. Well, it is not. There was a time I would have discussed these matters with the calm
of a nun during high mass, but on more than one occasion I have been insulted and ridiculed by you and Sig without the slightest provocation on my part other than to express opinions. Now I'm all for turning the other cheek when it is warranted, but even I have my boiling point.
I want no apology or retraction. And I will offer no apology or retraction. Let's leave it at that and go about our business and just behave like adults. Because, as you have seen, when I allow my bad side to come out (especially if I feel it is warranted) I let loose. If you feel you have done no wrong, so be it. You want to discuss things on a civilized level, you know very well I can do that without breaking a sweat. It is obvious that we are at opposite ends of the spectrum, so you present your case and I will present mine. But please don't expect for me abandon my beliefs, at this stage of the game, that ship has sailed. Nor would I expect that from you.
I have learned to accept that in this world people will disagree, that is part of life, but please don't insult my intelligence and I will do the same for you and Sig. It is ridiculous that a grown person cannot accept that others have thoughts and opinions all their own, and if anyone feels that they are wrong, well have your say then. But insulting someone's intelligence or right to say what they will, well that strikes me as anti-freedom and free will.
SGG
Quote:FUCK YOU!!! How's that for an incoherent drunken response, you hag. No, actually, I take that back. Hags wouldn't accept you into their union. They do have standards ya know.
Originally posted by 1kiki:
sgg
Just the FACTS, ma'am!
TROLL Central called, they need their broomstick back.....Smile, BIG SMILE!!!
I apologize.I assumed your irrational, incoherent rants were excused by drunkenness. Is this your natural state?
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I agree. Hillary has stumbled ever since the DNC convention and
is now trying to regain her stride, but Trump has overplayed his
hand and has stalled his own momentum.
The Debates, if he doesn't chicken out, will be an interesting
next stage of the final campaign push. I will bet the house that
he will make a shambles of the proceedings and steadily falter in
the heat of the pressure. He will offer up nothing, as per usual,
and give pause to those still "undecided."
Hillary's got to present her case as to why she should be in the
White House, but also "step on Donald's neck" and keep up the
pressure of his total lack of political experience.....and I'm
not talking about political correctness, but political knowledge.
She needs to expose him for what he is, a charlatan in sheep's clothing.
SGG
Quote:Nothing much is actually happening in this race. Hillary Clinton has had a fairly steady, yet tiny, 3.5 percent lead over Trump all year. Then she got a boost that wore off from the Democratic convention. The single most remarkable thing about the Clinton vs. Trump race is how stable it's been ever since the day Trump took his famous escalator ride down to the ground floor of Trump Tower to announce his candidacy.
Originally posted by second:Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
secondQuote:
She needs the revealing moment from Dead Zone (1983)
Are you saying that only a fictitious scenario (that will never happen in real life, I might add) can help Hillary now? Is that what you think?
http://election.princeton.edu/history-of-meta-analysis/
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrp
romo#now
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME