TRUMP - Just because.....................Naw, I just can't say it!
POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Monday, March 9, 2026 20:06
VIEWED: 244478
PAGE 56 of 170
Quote:Because of the Constitution, there is no way for me to rein in Hillary, no more than I could rein in Bush/Cheney and their rein of error.
Originally posted by 1kiki:
So, I have a question for you, second. . . .
Do you have a plan to address her broken actions and rein her in?
Or are you going to ride her all the way down?
But Congress can by refusing to approve thousands of Hillary's judicial and cabinet and department appointments and all her budgets and all her drafts of legislation.
And Republicans (excluding Trump) have already said their policy toward Prez Hillary shall be scorched earth. Obviously Trump will be a good sport about losing the election. He certainly won't use incendiary speeches to claim the election was Absolutely and Totally Rigged. He is too much a gentleman.
www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/08/2016-gop-hillary-clinton-deleg
itimizing-dems-214170
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Tell me 1kiki, how does shooting trump, as a collaborator, start an 'overt military confrontation' with Russia? Is there something you wish to share with the class?
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
He's a weak pathetic pile of bull shit and should be shot for consorting with the enemy..........
namely Putin (his man crush).
Do you WANT an overt military confrontation with Russia? This is a test to see how crazy you are.
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
With Putin, you never know. Although he is crazy, no telling what he'll do. But with trump as president, watch out, WWIII could easily start with a stupid remark or thoughtless utterance from the SFB-in-Chief.
Trump's tweet shows his depth of understanding and brilliance of stupidity.
An oxymoron if ever there's been one......crazy is not the word I would use.
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:If Putin invades a Baltic nation (all are part of Nato) to reunite the Russian speakers with the Motherland, then Putin is crazy. Crazy people can always invent a justification for acting crazy: It is Mother Russia whispering into his ear, telling Putin to reunite all her scattered children into one family again.
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Do you WANT an overt military confrontation with Russia? 1kiki used black letters on a black background to hide: "This is a test to see how crazy you are."
Back to Trump:
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
Dwyane Wade's cousin was just shot and killed walking her baby in Chicago. Just what I have been saying. African-Americans will VOTE TRUMP!
11:26 AM - 27 Aug 2016
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/769571710924263424
This particular tweet isn’t going to do too much of anything to debunk the notion that Trump simply lacks a certain level of human empathy that we expect from a president. An innocent woman is dead. Children have lost their mother. A family is grieving. And Trump is making a boast about his electoral performance. From any other candidate it would be considered shocking, but staying shocked is a challenge as we watch the Trump campaign unfold.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I agree Second. Trump will be eating shit as he fades away into TV land for an attempt at another reality show.
But, of course, that whole thing about Putin's support for Trump is made up.
Made up by the same people that said there was WMDs. This is FUN. We're making up shit again. Score 1 for the Gipper!
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:I have papers proving I'm certifiably lazy. Crazy papers I don't have.
Originally posted by 1kiki:
CONGRATULATIONS SECOND! You've passed the test and are certifiably crazy! No wonder you like that crazy bitch Hillary so much!
Donald Trump and his new team think they have 73 days to turn this campaign around. They’re wrong.
Early voting begins in 28 days in Minnesota and in 32 other states soon after that. And already 90 percent of Americans say they’ve decided. For all the televised daily drama this race has provided, the final outcome itself is shaping up to be less dramatic than any presidential election since 1984.
“Kellyanne is good at this, but she’s got a very damaged candidate and it’s very late in the game,” said Tony Fratto, a GOP operative in Washington and former deputy press secretary to President George W. Bush. “I think it’s too late, in fact. I don’t believe he can change. All of this is trying to trick voters into thinking there is a better Donald Trump out there. There is no better Donald Trump.”
Asked to name a smell they might associate with this election, participants in a focus group conducted by Peter Hart in Wisconsin last week gave the following responses: “sulfur,” “rotten eggs,” "garbage,” “manure” and a “skunk’s fart.”
www.politico.com/story/2016/08/trump-campaign-turn-around-out-of-time-
227457
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Because of the Constitution, there is no way for me to rein in Hillary, no more than I could rein in Bush/Cheney and their rein of error.
But Congress can by refusing to approve thousands of Hillary's judicial and cabinet and department appointments and all her budgets and all her drafts of legislation.
And then we come to the nub, the ONE THING that Congress can't stop: military intervention
Please reconsider our past 16 years ... more, if you count Bill's great adventure in Yugoslavia. The USA has been rampaging through the world:
-----
Invading Afghanistan and bombing it even further back into the Stone Age. Consider the starvation and the extreme repression that women experienced under a resurgent Taliban.
Invading Iraq, and destabilizing an entire region. By "de-Baathifying" Iraq and creating a power vacuum, jihadists were given free play through the region.
Destroying Libya, and destabilizing an entire region, creating poverty and extremism in a formerly prosperous, secular nation. The arms shipped in by Qatar and Saudi Arabia (via Turkey) were transshipped (by the CIA) to Syria via Turkey. Other arms flowed the rest of N Africa and into extremist hands http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/feb/28/gadhafis-weapons-flood
ed-africa-middle-east-west-l/ (France had to "clean up" Chad and Mali.)
A "false flag" chemical attack on the Damascus suburb of East Ghouta, blamed on Assad crossing a "red line" but engineered by somebody else, designed to draw in USA bombing raids. These were robustly discouraged by Russian destroyers and cruisers (from Sevastopol/Crimean) athwart the Syrian coast.
And then ... Sevastopol and Crimea come into view. Victoria Nuland, wife of (in)famous neocon Kagan and Hillary protoge, activates Operation Ukraine and decides NOW is the time to "birth this thing" and "make this thing stick" and "fuck the EU" and bring in snipers and provocateurs and make Maidan boil. Destabilization Ukraine complete.
Sanctions against Russia. Operation Oil Price War.
Operation Syria comes back into view. Turkey releases refugees. Terrorist attacks across the EU. We know how that's going.
The USA supporting the breakaway of South Sudan to prevent China from accessing the sweet, sweet crude of the former "Sudan". South Sudan is now in full civil war.
Pivot to the East. China and the USA tussling over the South China Sea.
Foreign policy spiraling further and further out of control. Circling the drain, one might think.
-----
I could bring up other examples of the United States destabilizing nations across the globe, with links.
What I want you to consider... take your head out of Texas for a moment, take a deep deep breath and ask yourself ...
... Breathe...
.... breathe ...
When, in the past 16 years, has USA foreign policy NOT... I repeat NOT .... been a total clusterfuck, killing hundreds of thousands (if not millions) and leaving broad swathes of the globe in ruins?
And when has Congress ever stopped these clusterfucks?
Please, try to answer those questions. Devote a few moments of your day... whatever it is... to contemplating those thoughts.
I'll continue with this later.
--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.nooalf.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The last 16 years are nothing special. Remember Vietnam? Remember the Spanish American War? Mexican–American War? Don’t shift the blame for recent foreign adventures from Congress to the President. The U.S.A. has been on a foreign war rampage since 1775 and the Battle of Quebec. It invaded Canada again in the War of 1812. Twice they tried to steal Canada.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
And then we come to the nub, the ONE THING that Congress can't stop: military intervention
Please reconsider our past 16 years ... more, if you count Bill's great adventure in Yugoslavia. The USA has been rampaging through the world:
. . .
Pivot to the East. China and the USA tussling over the South China Sea.
. . .
I could bring up other examples of the United States destabilizing nations across the globe, with links.
What I want you to consider... take your head out of Texas for a moment, take a deep deep breath and ask yourself ...
... Breathe...
.... breathe ...
When, in the past 16 years, has USA foreign policy NOT... I repeat NOT .... been a total clusterfuck, killing hundreds of thousands (if not millions) and leaving broad swathes of the globe in ruins?
And when has Congress ever stopped these clusterfucks?
Please, try to answer those questions.
America has always been full of belligerent, yet cowardly, thieves and the worst of them are in Congress. Those sneaky bastards are always demanding that the White House take action somewhere in the world.
The sneaky bastards don’t want to take responsibility when the adventure goes wrong but they certainly provide oversized budgets to do it. Congress always talks about the jobs created by military spending, except it never cared about that. It is about making money and bullying other countries.
The President is at the steering wheel of the war machine, but Congress is the engine pushing the U.S.A. into war after war. And the brakes don’t work. Money is the fuel. To stop the machine, take away the funding for defense. That is Congress's decision, not the President's.
Elect a different Congress and you’ll get a different result. Change Presidents and nothing changes about war. And I don’t believe Trump about him being a peaceful President. That guy is belligerent by nature. And proven to be a thief by his business practice. He’ll go to war, too, just like every other President being shoved from behind by Congress into a fight.
www.pgpf.org/chart-archive/0053_defense-comparison
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The USA has been at CONTINUOUS war for 13 years, and in that time destroyed or destabilized eight nations. (I forgot Yemen, which we can add to the list. Also Honduras.) That's quite a record. Yanno, WWII only lasted four years for us.
Not eight short years ago, you were frothing at the mouth because of GWB being a disastrous Commander in Chief. And in a discussion about Hillary's responsibility for Libya, did you not argue that only the President had the authority to send in American troops, absolving the Scy of State from any responsibility? Back then, you were OK with blaming the President. But now, are you trying to say that the President is just an innocent bystander to what Congress does? Is "Congress" your current excuse for the string of military and intelligence nightmares under Bush and Obama?
--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I thought this went well. Farage in Mississippi:
--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:It is worse than you think:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
The USA has been at CONTINUOUS war for 13 years, and in that time destroyed or destabilized eight nations. (I forgot Yemen, which we can add to the list. Also Honduras.) That's quite a record. Yanno, WWII only lasted four years for us.
America Has Been At War 93% of the Time – 224 Out of 240 Years – Since 1776.
www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/02/america-war-93-time-222-239-years-sinc
e-1776.html
Good Presidents or bad ones, it is always the same. War, war, and more war.
Quote:You're so serious. Lighten up.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Not eight short years ago, you were frothing at the mouth because of GWB being a disastrous Commander in Chief. And in a discussion about Hillary's responsibility for Libya, did you not argue that only the President had the authority to send in American troops, absolving the Scy of State from any responsibility? Back then, you were OK with blaming the President. But now, are you trying to say that the President is just an innocent bystander to what Congress does? Is "Congress" your current excuse for the string of military and intelligence nightmares under Bush and Obama?
Did you ever see the movie Speed (1994)? Sandra Bullock must drive a city bus full of passengers faster than 50mph or else the bus explodes. Hillary will be playing the role of Sandra Bullock and the Pentagon is the city bus. Congress plays the role of Dennis Hopper, the bus bomber who choose the speed of 50mph and is monitoring the bus by watching TV coverage from traffic helicopters.
If it was Trump driving instead of Hillary, he’d be on the sidewalk crushing pedestrians with the bus. (He wanted to nuke Syria to kill ISIS.) Bush & Cheney certainly loved to kill civilians and torturing anybody who got in the way while they were at the controls of the Pentagon. America needs a different Congress, the Dennis Hopper in this drama, to slow down and defuse the Pentagon by giving it a smaller budget. Hillary can’t do it. All she can do is steer the Pentagon and try not to let it kill too many of the innocent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_(1994_film)
I think this means retired President Obama will be Keanu Reeves.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME