Hillary Clinton: just because she deserves her own thread
POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Saturday, September 27, 2025 01:07
VIEWED: 114591
PAGE 21 of 46
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
--------------
I'll tell you what I DON'T like about Trump: I think that he has never confronted either the international banking cartel, nor the CIA-State Dept multi-headed hydra, nor the military-industrial complex. The last person to confront them was JFK (BTW, ALL immigration was illegal under JFK) and look what happened to him.
Yes, but you're voting for him anyway
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hillary Cracks, Gives FBI A "Voluntary" Three Hour Interview Over Private Email Server
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-02/hillary-cracks-gives-fbi-volu
ntary-three-hour-interview-over-private-email-server
--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that can get a few more shekels in their pockets.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Reflecting on the Journal’s report, award-winning journalist Jeremy Scahill, one of the world’s leading experts on the secretive CIA drone program, commented, “So many liberals poo poo the Hillary email scandal for totally partisan reasons. If it was a Republican, they would be going bananas.”
“People claiming emails on Hillary’s private server were not classified do not understand how classification works,” Scahill added. “It’s an HRC talking point.”
http://www.salon.com/2016/06/10/fbi_criminal_investigation_emails_clin
ton_approved_cia_drone_assassinations_with_her_cellphone_report_says/
FBI criminal investigation emails: Clinton approved CIA drone assassinations with her cellphone, report says
The FBI has been conducting a criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified information for months.
An explosive new report reveals just what it is that the FBI is looking to: emails in which then-Secretary of State Clinton approved CIA drone assassinations in Pakistan with her cellphone.
From 2011 on, the State Department had a secret arrangement with the CIA, giving it a degree of say over whether or not a drone killing would take place.
The emails that are at the heart of the FBI’s criminal investigation are 2011 and 2012 messages between U.S. diplomats in Pakistan and their State Department superiors in D.C., in which the officials approved drone strikes.
Clinton’s aides forwarded some of these emails to her personal email account, on a private server in her home in suburban New York.
These are the revelations of a report by The Wall Street Journal http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-emails-in-probe-dealt-with-planned
-drone-strikes-1465509863, based on information provided by anonymous congressional and law-enforcement officials who were briefed on the FBI’s probe.
The State Department revealed in January that 22 of the emails that were on Clinton’s private server at her home contained top-secret information. These messages were not publicly released, and an investigation was eventually launched.
The White House acknowledged in a press briefing on Thursday that the FBI probe into Clinton’s handling of classified information is a “criminal investigation.” President Obama endorsed Clinton for president on the same day.
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hillary’s holiday plans: FBI will reportedly interrogate Clinton over long weekend
http://www.salon.com/2016/07/01/hillarys_holiday_plans_fbi_will_report
edly_interrogate_clinton_over_long_weekend/
Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton is scheduled to meet with FBI officials Saturday, says “a source close to the investigation” who tipped off The Daily Caller.
The meeting will reportedly pertain to Clinton’s alleged misuse of a private email server — located at her home in Chappaqua, New York — to handle classified documents during her tenure as Secretary of State.
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"Asked about the FBI investigation, the WikiLeaks head (Assange) said he thinks Clinton “unfortunately” won’t be indicted.
“We have accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton; we could proceed to an indictment,” Assange said, but Attorney General Loretta Lynch see 'Snakes on a Plane', above , the top official at the Department of Justice, who was appointed by President Obama, won’t indict Clinton, Assange argued.
“It’s not going to happen,” he said. “But the FBI can push for concessions from a Clinton government. Fantastic. President Hillary being blackmailed by the FBI.
Assange stressed that “there’s very strong material, both in the emails and in relation to the Clinton Foundation,” that incriminates Clinton.
The WikiLeaks editor also blasted Clinton for her extreme hawkishness.
Assange pointed out that Clinton’s emails “show that Hillary was overriding the Pentagon’s reluctance to overthrow [Libyan dictator] Muammar Qaddafi, because they predicted that the post-war outcome would be something like what it is, which is ISIS taking over the country.”” Thanks! Hillary. Great work!
WikiLeaks will release new Clinton emails to add to incriminating evidence, Julian Assange says, in “big year ahead”
http://www.salon.com/2016/06/14/wikileaks_will_release_new_clinton_ema
ils_to_add_to_incriminating_evidence_julian_assange_says_in_big_year_ahead/
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I have downloaded a copy of the DNC draft platform. It's available, should anyone care to look for it. It has a SERIOUS amount of blah-blah-blah in it... 90% or more, I think. But I'll do an analysis an tell you what it DOESN'T say.
Right away, I can say that it DOESN'T repudiate both the trans-Pacific "free trade" agreement (TPP) and the trans-Atlantic trade agreement (TTIP).
--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that can get a few more shekels in their pockets.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There it is, History being made..................a WIN for the GOOD guys. FINALLY!!!
F@CK Yeah!
Of course, the republicans will stretch this out for another 6 years and $10 Million later. Truthfully, it's the rich suing the rich. Smoke & mirrors, my friends.
Sheep, wool, eyes.
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
"Asked about the FBI investigation, the WikiLeaks head (Assange) said he thinks Clinton “unfortunately” won’t be indicted.
“We have accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton; we could proceed to an indictment,” Assange said, but Attorney General Loretta Lynch see 'Snakes on a Plane', above , the top official at the Department of Justice, who was appointed by President Obama, won’t indict Clinton, Assange argued.
“It’s not going to happen,” he said. “But the FBI can push for concessions from a Clinton government. Fantastic. President Hillary being blackmailed by the FBI.
Assange stressed that “there’s very strong material, both in the emails and in relation to the Clinton Foundation,” that incriminates Clinton.
The WikiLeaks editor also blasted Clinton for her extreme hawkishness.
Assange pointed out that Clinton’s emails “show that Hillary was overriding the Pentagon’s reluctance to overthrow [Libyan dictator] Muammar Qaddafi, because they predicted that the post-war outcome would be something like what it is, which is ISIS taking over the country.”” Thanks! Hillary. Great work!
WikiLeaks will release new Clinton emails to add to incriminating evidence, Julian Assange says, in “big year ahead”
http://www.salon.com/2016/06/14/wikileaks_will_release_new_clinton_ema
ils_to_add_to_incriminating_evidence_julian_assange_says_in_big_year_ahead/
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quite frankly, it's a bunch of rich fuckers trying to divvy up the world and we are the sheep being lead to the slaughter.
The Matrix Revisited.
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I have downloaded a copy of the DNC draft platform. It's available, should anyone care to look for it. It has a SERIOUS amount of blah-blah-blah in it... 90% or more, I think. But I'll do an analysis an tell you what it DOESN'T say.
Right away, I can say that it DOESN'T repudiate both the trans-Pacific "free trade" agreement (TPP) and the trans-Atlantic trade agreement (TTIP).
--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that can get a few more shekels in their pockets.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The New York RAG......er.......I mean Post. From the sublimely ridiculous to the ridiculously absurd. Talk about your MSM. (More like mass shit stain).
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME