TRUMP - Just because.....................Naw, I just can't say it!
POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Monday, March 9, 2026 20:06
VIEWED: 244478
PAGE 2 of 170
2nd - Nothing Obama has done will put more than a modest dent in American inequality. But his actions aren’t trivial, either.
2nd - I thought this was about Trump. Am I mistaken?
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I see where you got your chart: “Reagan fucked middle class, but it was Bill Clinton who took it to the next level—see charts.” By SChelydra Monday Feb 08, 2016 · 1:37 PM CDT
Originally posted by 1kiki:
2nd - Nothing Obama has done will put more than a modest dent in American inequality. But his actions aren’t trivial, either.
2nd - I thought this was about Trump. Am I mistaken?
www.dailykos.com/story/2016/2/8/1481608/--All-that-matters-is-whether-
people-are-better-off-when-you-quit-than-when-you-started-Bill-Clinton

There is a paper that covers this called: “Why Hasn’t Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality?”
http://voteview.com/pdf/jep_BMPR.pdf
So you don't have to read the paper, I'll summarize: The wealthy top 1% have strongly turned against redistribution. Congress follows the 1% because the bottom 50% can't be bothered to vote or read the paper “Why Hasn’t Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality?”.
I will repeat that: Since the bottom 50% won’t vote, the top 1% will have their way in the USA. Trump, Bernie and Hillary will not be running a get out the vote for the bottom 50%.
That the bottom 50% need to help each other and even vote for the advantage of each other seems so very unAmerican to the bottom 50%. The top 1% can take advantage of this lack of cooperation at the bottom. Trump, Bernie and Hillary are not going to fix that.
45% of Bernie voters say they’re #NeverHillary, 15% will vote for Trump
http://redalertpolitics.com/2016/05/12/poll-45-bernie-voters-say-theyr
e-neverhillary-15-will-vote-trump/
https://twitter.com/guypbenson/status/718462053632065537/photo/1
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Fuck it! I'm here, why not!? There's word that he once was a cross-dresser and pulled the wings of butterflies; drowned puppies and molested little girls in Southern Ohio.
Benghazi was his idea (he really wanted that oil) and he once Instagrammed a pic of
him and Qaddaffi ball slapping each other. Marla Maples was really a guy who blackmailed The Donald. And he wears an SS uniform while dancing to the music of
the Dusseldorf Five; with a black Hitler mustache thong.
Hey this made up shit is FUN!
One more time, Benghazi was his idea. Damn!, that feels good. Now I know why you
guys use it against Hilary, so much fun!
SGG
This must be the lamest attempt at strawman argument for reasonable people to ignore all the facts, truth, anecdotes of Hilliary, and all of the crimes she has committed.
It's like you are not even trying to be credible, which makes a poor comparison to all of the incredibly credible points about Hilliary.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
So SECOND, in reply you offer a unflattering picture and a made-up video? You've descended to THUGR-levels, who offers "raspberry wars" in lieu of a relevant reply.
You're normally lucid and on-target. So, are you one of those Hillary-voters who can't explain their vote?
My question of second's recent post trend of sensibility has been seconded.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
So SECOND, in reply you offer a unflattering picture and a made-up video? You've descended to THUGR-levels, who offers "raspberry wars" in lieu of a relevant reply.
You're normally lucid and on-target. So, are you one of those Hillary-voters who can't explain their vote?
My question of second's recent post trend of sensibility has been seconded.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
2nd - Nothing Obama has done will put more than a modest dent in American inequality. But his actions aren’t trivial, either.
2nd - I thought this was about Trump. Am I mistaken?
Another sign of 1kiki and SIG trying to control the content of a thread.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"Congress follows the 1% because the bottom 50% can't be bothered to vote or read the paper “Why Hasn’t Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality?”."
You know that saying - if you find yourself in a hole the first thing to do is STOP DIGGING?
That applies to Obama, to Hillary, and the 'democratic' party. And their failure to do that is the reason why they have lost American hearts and minds and, oh let's not forget, congress and the governorships. 50% of voters USED to identify as 'd'. And they USED to come out and VOTE. Now it's down to 30%. And their vote is in question.
It's not a 'them' fault. They know how to support the democratic party. They've done it before. It's a 'democratic' party fault that walked away from its vision of fairness, opportunity, freedom and hope.
When was the last time the 'democrats' stood for something? And what is Hillary doing to bring people back into the 'd' fold? Courting republicans? Schmoozing with her fellow neocons?
http://www.people-press.org/interactives/party-id-trend/
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:You said "hearts and minds"! You know what ended the Democrats’ control of the majority of governorships and state legislatures? The Civil Rights Acts. Look into the hearts and minds of Texans who are R's. When LBJ was alive they were Democrats, but now they are Republicans. Your theory that the Democratic Party is at fault ignores why D’s immigrated to R’s. The R hearts are mean, the R minds are small. I want to go back to Insulting Trump. He is an example for all Republicans.
Originally posted by 1kiki:
"Congress follows the 1% because the bottom 50% can't be bothered to vote or read the paper “Why Hasn’t Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality?”."
You know that saying - if you find yourself in a hole the first thing to do is STOP DIGGING?
That applies to Obama, to Hillary, and the 'democratic' party. And their failure to do that is the reason why they have lost American hearts and minds and, oh let's not forget, congress and the governorships. 50% of voters USED to identify as 'd'. And they USED to come out and VOTE. Now it's down to 30%. And their vote is in question.
It's not a 'them' fault. They know how to support the democratic party. They've done it before. It's a 'democratic' party fault that walked away from its vision of fairness, opportunity, freedom and hope.
When was the last time the 'democrats' stood for something? And what is Hillary doing to bring people back into the 'd' fold? Courting republicans? Schmoozing with her fellow neocons?
www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2016/05/a-year-of-living-dangerously
.html
Trump has succeeded in the land of the free-for-all, a place where narcissism is rewarded with undivided attention. Trump has just about won the Republican nomination, not because he's the best man, not because he knows jack all about governing, government, foreign policy or any other policy, not because he's rich, not because he's got a new vision, not because he's promised the moon, not because he wants to help the poor, but because he's loud. He's so loud that we can hear him all the way over here on the other side of the Atlantic.
He has always been loud, always looking for attention, a poor little rich boy who probably didn't get enough of it when it mattered. Narcissism usually has its roots in some chronic childhood slight. Whether it's the father or the mother who's at fault doesn't matter. Now we've got this big old baby begging for more on a national scale.
Trump has been around a long time. For as long as I can remember he's been a risible figure on the New York party scene, a local show-off who put his syllable on buildings and a series of trophy wives. He was never taken seriously before, and the fact that he is now being taken seriously points to a deep sickness in the American psyche, an infantilism that projects the mechanisms of The Apprentice, or America's Top Model, or from earlier times, Queen for a Day on the future destiny of the nation. Reality has been left behind in the blurred lines between TV and life.
Someone I knew who had worked for a soap opera production company once told me that weddings were a no-no in a soap opera, the reason being that the TV station would be inundated with wedding gifts for the fictional newlyweds, from fans who were unable distinguish fact from fiction, reality from TV.
Now that we're at a point where a minor TV celebrity is actually posing as a serious candidate for an office that ought to embody intelligence, experience, knowledge, maturity, and leadership abilities, we have to ask ourselves where it all went wrong, before it's too late.
. . .
But seeing the ascendency of those whom Roger Cohen in the New York Times calls the ‘know-nothings'—and Trump is surely one of them—I've changed my mind.
. . .
In America, on the other hand, it is the cult of personality that defines politics. A brilliant, knowledgeable wimp will always
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump on Global Warming
www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/05/trumpapalooza-may-23-2016
Publicly, Trump has made it clear that he thinks global warming is a hoax. But when it comes to building a sea wall to protect one of his golf courses, it turns out he's a true believer: "If the predictions of an increase in sea level rise as a result of global warming prove correct," his company says in a letter, "it could reasonably be expected that the rate of sea level rise might become twice of that presently occurring....As a result, we would expect the rate of dune recession to increase."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump is a Rapist
www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/05/trumpapalooza-may-23-2016
Trump's former wife Ivana said Trump raped her in a sworn deposition. Given how central a role rape accusations have played in Trump's campaign — against Mexicans, political opponents, etc. it is clearly a highly germane question, as frankly it would be for any presidential candidate.
The details surrounding the alleged rape are bizarrely novelistic even by Trumpian standards. According to Ivana, Trump was driven to freakish rage by a failed anti-baldness surgery — a so-called 'scalp reduction'. But the actions are very clear cut. According to her deposition, Trump flew into a rage, attacked her, held her down and began pulling hair out of her head to mimic his pain and then forcibly penetrated her....This was a pretty concrete and specific [accusation]. And the author of the book that first surfaced the deposition said he'd found numerous friends of Ivana's who she had confided the incident to at the time.
Poor Ivana! She had to deal with this naked slob! Ugh. I see why she divorced him.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME