Real World Event Discussions

Funny Cartoon sparks Islamic Jihad !

POSTED BY: JaynezTown
UPDATED: Wednesday, August 26, 2026 18:50
VIEWED: 48820
PAGE 18 of 26

Thursday, November 19, 2015 5:32 PM

Kerry

https://www.facebook.com/FoxBusiness/videos/10153707641470238/

Hirsi Ali on Channel 4 (the wacko British aljasera style channel who broadcast the leader of Iran as a British Christmas message)


Atheist Roo



NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, November 19, 2015 6:52 PM

Interesting post. I see a lot of people no longer post here. Too bad. This is still a cool site, if not heavily used.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, November 19, 2015 8:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by G:
Quote:

Originally posted by JAYNEZTOWN:

Ayaan Hirsi Ali




Wow - she's brilliant - I love her & I fear for her. I don't think any muslim man would listen to her, especially a radical one. "Death cult" says it well. I'm encouraged that she's encouraged.

Scroll up and watch the video if you haven't - it's not a nutty extremist video.

That's the problem. Too many literalist fundamentalist whackos. Islam needs too change, but the crazies think change is blasphemy.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, November 19, 2015 8:24 PM

Quote:

..JAYNEZTOWN, Sept. 8th 2004

Hot headed reactions like these are kind of understandable. I saw much worse ideas than this Flynn guy on the Yahoo-news and MSN-news board

It's true that these Islamic terrorists are scum, and if they take human life, bomb hospitals or kill children they deserve to die.

However not all Arabs, Muslims or Islamics are like these radical nuts. Many are just ordinary folk and some don't give a damn about religion. Terrorism will always exist in some form, it is hard to defeat but it can be largely prevented.

Terrorism flourishes where there is ethnic hatred, radical political leaders, religious nuts and oppression..these are the places where it grows and gets strong.

The probelm is that some try to strike back using overkill methods only to see terror groups spring back in other places and sometimes stronger.

Take the example of Clinton, he was a bullcrap president and spent much time with Monica and cigars. However he done ok for the USA and was smart when it came to global politics and events. In Kosovo, we had different ethnic groups and races killing ecah other. Clinton was forced to act and planes bombed. Afterwards there were big problems, yet Clinton set up the smart framework so that the area would be secure, safe and free from dictators or terrorists again. Clinton also done good in parts of Asia, Northern Ireland and the Middle East.

Now take our idiot Bush, all fight but no brains instead of finding the evil Binladen and his Taliban friends Bush is off causing trouble in the Iraq. Meanwhile N-Korea is building long range Nukes that reach the west coast and Iran has a real WMD program. Terrorism flourishes where there is ethnic hatred, radical political leaders, religious nuts and oppression..these are the places where it grows and gets strong and this might be why it's now growing in Iraq, a place where Al-Quaida could not have existed some months ago as Saddam used to hatethem and other religious radicals. It seems Bush has plenty of bravado and fight in him, but no brains and tactics and no idea about peace, and security or winning the war.

There is no doubt these islamic extremists are evil and they should be killed for what they have done. However not respond by bombing a city
let's catch them , put them on trial and shoot them.

The worst thing Russia could do is play this like Bush has done, by pinning it on some other random city ( Baghdad-Iraq ) . When I speak of Clinton or Bush I don't just mean the presidents but the advisors and administartion which surrounds. Is Bush smart enough to win peace and security or are the terrorists coming back and more people going to die ?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, November 19, 2015 8:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by G:
Quote:

Originally posted by JAYNEZTOWN:

Ayaan Hirsi Ali




Wow - she's brilliant - I love her & I fear for her. I don't think any muslim man would listen to her, especially a radical one. "Death cult" says it well. I'm encouraged that she's encouraged.

Scroll up and watch the video if you haven't - it's not a nutty extremist video.



I don't think she is G. I like her but can you imagine Catholics throwing away all the passages in the bible that don't fit into todays modern society, I can't. They would never do it. Just look at the fact that at the end of life if you were bad, you are to burn in hell for all eternity. ( How cruel and unforgiving is that? ) The way that was changed was in how that concept is taught. You'll never get them to remove the passages.

That is what has to change in the Muslim world. How their faith is taught. How the most extreme verses in the Koran, are taught as being extreme. The reason many Muslims believe what they believe today is because Islam is still being taught as it was in the 7th century. Like the Bible the Koran is schizophrenic. On one hand they preach tolerance and with the other they teach intolerance.

Where I think she gave us a hint at what helps temper the Muslims is exposure to modern societies. In the middle east they are not directly exposed to modernity. "Catholicism, understood on its own terms, is radically opposed to American culture, and to the essence of modernity." Yet look how well it works today because of the changes in the way Catholicism is taught in modern times. And if you exclude the poor Mexican immigrants coming in from our southern border, this country was becoming less religious. In time they too will become less religious.

It's when some like JAYNZTOWN lash out that things go awry. Perhaps a kind of new testament for the Koran is in order, but lashing out is certainly not the answer.



NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, December 17, 2015 8:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by reaverfan:


Scroll up and watch the video if you haven't - it's not a nutty extremist video.
That's the problem. Too many literalist fundamentalist whackos. Islam needs too change, but the crazies think change is blasphemy.



Geller with Dobbs

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, January 6, 2016 1:08 AM



Crowd of ‘Arab origin’ blamed for mass sexual assaults?

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, January 11, 2016 6:28 PM

Some online reaction to this whole Rape refugees, riots, theft, molesting women in Germany, Sweden, France, Austria and other places....might be a difficult summer. Some feel this is only a preview of events to come

This New Militant Atheist poltical movement is getting stronger each day











Quote:




Guardian: Poor Migrants Rape Western Women Because They Have Smartphone
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1825876_Guardian__Poor_Migrants_Rape_
Western_Women_Because_They_Have_Smartphones.html

Liberals shouldn’t be afraid to ask hard questions. Young German women thankfully enjoy historically unprecedented economic and sexual freedom, with their expensive smartphones and their right to celebrate New Year’s Eve however they want. The same isn’t always true of young male migrants exchanging life under repressive regimes, where they may at least have enjoyed superiority over women

Mass Assaults over NYE Renew German Tensions Over Migrants
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1166645
The victim, who the TV channel identified only by her first name, Michelle, said police didn't take her sexual assault claim seriously for several days and at first, would only file a report about her cell phone being stolen.


German media apologizes for covering up New Years attacks
http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showthread.php?s=bdb361a498dd1fdebb7c88
193ae230ea&t=276637

Editors of the network’s nightly news show “Heute” (translated to “Today” in English) confessed to not covering the attacks despite knowing the magnitude and severity of the events. Leaked police documents also confirm authorities held back on reporting information to the public until the media broke the story Monday — four days after the attacks.


Muslim Rape Gangs Attack Women, and Feminists Won’t Say a Word About It
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showthread.php?71011-M
uslim-Rape-Gangs-Attack-Women-and-Feminists-Won%92t-Say-a-Word-About-It

American feminists, who have incited irrational hysteria over a non-existent “rape epidemic” on U.S. college campuses, will ignore this news. American feminists never said a word about the Rotherham Horror, in which English girls as young as 11 were pimped out by Muslim predators.
...
Merkel should be proud. Times woman of the year for letting the freaks ravage her country...
...
This sort of thing is ongoing in the UK too, not just this particular case


...
---
....
Mass sexual assault in Cologne over 30 women culturally enriched
http://leekyforums.com/thread/4446760/politics/mass-sexual-assault-in-
cologne-over-30-women.html

"Germany pisses me off so fucking much. "


...
---
...

THE ideologues of modern feminism have plumbed new depths of hypocrisy in the past week.


If there was ever any doubt that the feminist movement has been hijacked by unprincipled cowards more concerned with their own moral vanity than equality between the sexes, there shouldn’t be now.

One would’ve thought that the loudest segments of the sisterhood, who write obsessively about imagined rape culture and victim blaming, would be eager to examine the very real and sickening sexual brutality visited upon hundreds of women in Germany on New Year’s Eve by hordes of entitled men.

Feminists’ silence on issues such as forced marriages, female genital mutilation, honour killings and wholesale subjugation of women in Muslim countries is nothing new, but they are now silent on incidents occurring in the Western world.

Gang attacks on women in Germany and other parts of Europe by newly-arrived Muslim migrants, some of whom view women as nothing more than objects, have barely raised a ripple among feminist activists who can be relied upon to become enraged over the most trivial offence.

On New Year’s Eve in the German city of Cologne, up to a thousand men sexually assaulted and robbed dozens of

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, February 6, 2016 12:54 AM



Pamela Geller: Video of migrant assaulting a mother symbolizes Europe

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, March 6, 2016 4:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AgentRouka:
This whole thing is incredibly disturbing.

Protesting against free speech? Free speech is what is allowing those protests with their despicable slogans in the first place!



How beautiful would this planet be without hypocrisy or fanatism.



Which perhaps moves us onto the topic of the REGRESSIVE LEFT ??


http://forums.castanet.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=64860
when the left starts behaving like the right when it comes to free thinking they've gone to far in isolating themselves from exploring other ways of looking at things.
Quote:


http://www.narutoforums.com/showthread.php?t=1065968
Both the Tea Party and what I like to call the "Radical Progressive" movement to define the Regressive Left from traditional progressivism, seemed to start under similar origins namely a mass movement of people trying to mobilize against something they perceived as unjust. For the Tea Party it was the bailouts and the perceived overreach of federal government, for Radical Progressivism it was attempts to address serious social ills from inequality to police brutality against minorities.

Both originally garnered a lot of media attention and drew considerable support in the early goings. But as of now, both movements considered signs of hyperpartisanship and extreme political polarization that is causing considerable stress in public society. The Tea Party has become infamous for perpetuating obstruction and extreme political rhetoric through the Freedom Caucus in Congress and individuals like Cruz and Trump. While the Radical Progressive movement is becoming sharply criticized due to various individual actions from the Missouri protesters trying to intimidate journalists, OWS/BLM blocking roads and acting like a general public nuisance, an growing trend of censorship and segregation amongst college academia, etc.

The difference between the two is that the Regressive Left so far has been limited to protests and Tumblrites while the Tea Party arguably has done more harm via its actions in Congress and hijacking of the GOP. However, with many of the old guard progressives and Blue Dog Democrats that have been the core of the Democratic Party starting to fade out and radical progressives gaining more prominence in the media, is there a danger that the Regressive Left is about to have its own Tea Party bubble?



http://armorgames.com/community/thread/12563821/the-regressive-left
*Note: the title is kinda misleading, but I view "progressives" ironically regressive. Also, I don't usually use the Left-Right spectrum bs. I use the Authoritarian-Libertarian chart most of the time.

What do guys thing of so-called "progressives" (AKA SJWs)? For me, I view them as a threat. I saw people losing their jobs and getting socially castrated due to just disagreeing with them. Also, the mainstream media champions them as heroes/heroines. Why treat them as such?! They are bullies for crying out loud! Anyway, what do you think about them?


...
One thing I would like to note is being a "social justice warrior" isn't the same as being a progressive. Using wiki.

"Progressivism is a broad philosophy based on the Idea of Progress, which asserts that advancement in science, technology, economic development, and social organization are vital to improve the human condition."

""Social Justice Warrior", commonly abbreviated as "SJW", is a pejorative term for a person expressing or promoting socially progressive views, particularly relating to social liberalism, political correctness or feminism. The accusation of being an SJW implies that a person is engaging in putatively disingenuous social justice arguments or activism to raise their personal reputation."


http://www.politicsforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=105&t=46895

HornandoCortez wrote:
http://poqari.ml/2015/12/31/norway-oslo-police-we-have-lost-the-city/

It could spread across

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME