Escaped Syrian ISIS women tell their stories
POSTED BY: kpo
UPDATED: Monday, June 8, 2026 20:44
VIEWED: 5266
PAGE 3 of 6
Quote:Shall not be prohibited by Congress PRIOR TO THE YEAR 1808.
The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight.
AFTER THAT, IT CAN BE prohibited by Congress. Since we're well past 1808, I suppose the migration or importation of persons into the USA has come under the jurisdiction of Congress by now!
The issue was about slavery, and whether Congress could control the importation or transportation of slaves across state lines. The deal was a temporary one and expired in 1808. Just.... just... read it to yourself a few times. Give it a day or two to settle in.
---------------
It seems to me that you're doing your very best to distract from the goings-on in Raqqa. Maybe you think that it's a poor reflection of Muslims. Your topic is dead, as far as I'm concerned.
--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
(And the next time you see Hillary sidling somewhere near McCain, just note that she's just doing what she's always done best: Triangulating.)
have seen seen these?
https://twitter.com/WalidShoebat/status/667931859532181504
http://www.westernjournalism.com/former-muslim-schools-obama-islam-isi
l/
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:Shall not be prohibited by Congress PRIOR TO THE YEAR 1808.
The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight.
AFTER THAT, IT CAN BE prohibited by Congress. Since we're well past 1808, I suppose the migration or importation of persons into the USA has come under the jurisdiction of Congress by now!
The issue was about slavery, and whether Congress could control the importation or transportation of slaves across state lines. The deal was a temporary one and expired in 1808. Just.... just... read it to yourself a few times. Give it a day or two to settle in.
---------------
It seems to me that you're doing your very best to distract from the goings-on in Raqqa. Maybe you think that it's a poor reflection of Muslims. Your topic is dead, as far as I'm concerned.
--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.
Hey stupid, It was amended in the 13th amendment like I said. Passed by Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified on December 6, 1865, the 13th amendment abolished slavery in the United States and provides that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.".
If slavery was not abolished until 1865 then I would suggest to you the law was up and running until amended. At which point it became illegal to import persons for the stated purpose. And only the stated purpose.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Very little of the USA-official narrative of "Assad created ISIL" fits into this story. I mean, Where are Assad's barrel bombs? Where is this Syrian-based ISIL, and its burning desire for revenge against Assad?
"When the uprising against the government of President Bashar al-Assad began rippling across Syria in 2011, it seemed distant from Raqqa. As news of fighting and massacres started filtering in..."
"Abu Soheil had killed himself in an operation not against the hated Syrian Army, but against a competing rebel group that the Islamic State was trying to wipe out. “I cried for days,” she said. “He died fighting other Muslims.”"
"Mr. Assad’s forces were targeting civilians, sweeping into homes in the middle of the night and brutalizing men in front of their wives; the fighters had no choice but to respond with equal brutality, they said."
It's not personal. It's just war.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"If slavery was not abolished until 1865 then I would suggest to you the law was up and running until amended."
I'm sorry, but your failure to grasp - or admit that you were wrong - that the vision was null and void after 1808 is just plain stupid. And it wasn't 'amended' by the 13th amendment, because the 13th amendment 1) doesn't say anything about amending that clause, and 2) neither addresses importation or migration as toics that need its attention.
SHEESH!
And let me point out that when you dig yourself in to your erroneous position, you look willfully ignorant on top of being in error.
SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
lots of woo woo tinfoil
the woman ripping McCain may be accurate
Best of... China, Islam and ISIS
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Your quotes are from the NYTimes of course, the same outlet of Judith Miller and centrifuges under rosebushes fame.
Thanks for NOT providing a link so we all could check out the article easily and look at the statements in context. Here it is, as a courtesy you failed to provide. You're welcome. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/22/world/middleeast/isis-wives-and-enfo
rcers-in-syria-recount-collaboration-anguish-and-escape.html
Parsing it for evidence for facts, and for evidence of bias - as one should ALWAYS do regardless of 'source' - I found there was *AS USUAL* exactly ZERO evidence for this statement:
"When the uprising against the government of President Bashar al-Assad began rippling across Syria in 2011, it seemed distant from Raqqa. As news of fighting and massacres started filtering in..." Not only is it not attributed to any of the people interviewed for the story (eyewitness accounts, which are a fairly weak form of evidence) it's not attributed to anything at all. This seems to be a complete invention of the author.
As for this one "not against the hated Syrian Army", hated by whom isn't stated, but given the context, it means hated by ISIS. If Assad was hated by ISIS, that strikes me as being a good thing.
And finally, the last COMPLETE recounting is of ISIS rationalizing its brutality "At night, Aws and Dua heard attempts at self-justification from the husbands they had waited up for and would go to bed with. They had to be savage when taking a town to minimize casualties later, the men insisted. Mr. Assad’s forces were targeting civilians, sweeping into homes in the middle of the night and brutalizing men in front of their wives; the fighters had no choice but to respond with equal brutality, they said."
You've entirely misrepresented the story. No wonder you didn't provide a link. You sure are one lying bitch, aren't you?
Bye. I have better things to do than waste my time on assholes like you.
SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
ISIS plan, as far as I can see, is to use those "recruits" as so much canon fooder, and not just on the battlefield. They distract and deflect, and so create confusion, but, as it has been well described, they can lead to ISIS downfall.
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Good story. As time goes by there are more and more of complaints from ISIS members coming out. There was a story I read concerning the displeasure of some ISIS recruits about conditions where they are. Things like a lack of a good shampoo, and bad coffee. Sounds simple but complaints are complaints and they resonate with readers.
The backgrounds of many ISIS recruits are showing the other Muslims of the world that they are not followers of the Koran but instead street thugs who have dabbled in drugs. All this contributes to ISIS's downfall.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
"If slavery was not abolished until 1865 then I would suggest to you the law was up and running until amended."
I'm sorry, but your failure to grasp - or admit that you were wrong - that the vision was null and void after 1808 is just plain stupid. And it wasn't 'amended' by the 13th amendment, because the 13th amendment 1) doesn't say anything about amending that clause, and 2) neither addresses importation or migration as toics that need its attention.
SHEESH!
And let me point out that when you dig yourself in to your erroneous position, you look willfully ignorant on top of being in error.
The Constitution barred any attempt to outlaw the slave trade before 1808. "Such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit" is a really long-winded way of saying "slaves" without actually saying "slaves."
And then Congress did vote to block the international slave trade. That was the 13th amendment. However it says nothing about amending the part stating congress cannot stop states from allowing migrants (immigrants) into their state. It says nothing of completely eliminating Article 1, Section 9 of the Bill of Rights. It doesn't address the terms migrate or import part of Article therefore leaving it in tact. And that ladies is my point.
Migrant, a person who moves from place to place to get work. I don't care if originally this term was part of a deception. Congress by phrasing the amendment the way they did only gave themselves the right to block slavery after 1808, not migrants or immigrants.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"And then Congress did vote to block the international slave trade"
You wish!! International slave trade thrived until nearly 1900. (British/ Chinese) Your view of slavery is limited.
"It doesn't address the terms migrate or import part of Article therefore leaving it in tact."
Because the article had an expiration date, after which its terms were no longer valid. The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME