Real World Event Discussions

The ACTUAL War on Women : Brandeis University

POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 17:12
VIEWED: 11225
PAGE 11 of 12

Tuesday, June 17, 2014 4:17 AM

How fitting that a thread rappy started to claim the right doesn't attack women, has developed into him attacking a woman for providing a constitutionally-ensured defense.

True colors, folks.



“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”? Isaac Asimov

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, June 17, 2014 4:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Hillary Clinton did not help get a child rapist freed but instead it was Hillary Rodham. Yes later to become Mrs. Clinton. She was appointed by the court to defend the accused. She did her job unless you think she should have played judge and jury and throw the case. If you do you do not understand the rule of law and what it takes to defend it. Sometimes it is a very high price indeed.

[T]here is a little-known episode Clinton doesn't mention in her standard campaign speech in which those two principles collided. In 1975, a 27-year-old Hillary Rodham, acting as a court-appointed attorney, attacked the credibility of a 12-year-old girl in mounting an aggressive defense for an indigent client accused of rape in Arkansas — using her child development background to help the defendant.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Clintons_client.html


si shen





I'm sure you'd have been able to explain it that way to the 12 yr old girl who was raped.

Of course, she's no longer 12 any more, so I'm sure she's over it, and it's not big deal.

But this is just another example of just how pathetic and heartless Hillary is, even in her " youth ".

What difference, at this point, does it make ??

Indeed.



No sir, I would have taken him out back and cut his nuts off before killing him. I just understand what it takes to protect the rule of law at times and it truly sucks. Apparently you do not understand how the rules of law work and why they are so important.

si shen


NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, June 17, 2014 4:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
How fitting that a thread rappy started to claim the right doesn't attack women, has developed into him attacking a woman for providing a constitutionally-ensured defense.

True colors, folks.



“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”? Isaac Asimov




Those who hold the constitution most closely to there hearts and quote it the most, hate and ignore it when it when it gets in the way of what they want. Same with the bible, tora or coran.


si shen


NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, June 17, 2014 5:01 AM

OMFingG

he thinks this is the rule of law:

I would have taken him out back and cut his nuts off before killing him. I just understand what it takes to protect the rule of law at times



OONJERAH - We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.
"You, who live in any kind of comfort or convenience, do not know how these people can survive these things, do you? They will endure because there is no immediate escape from endurance. Some will die, the rest must live."

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, June 17, 2014 5:10 AM

Quote:


How fitting that a thread rappy started to claim the right doesn't attack women, has developed into him attacking a woman for providing a constitutionally-ensured defense



Only, that's not the claim that this thread was started for , at all.

Might wanna go back to page 1 and read the original post, Storybook.

True colors indeed. Hillary badgering a 12 yr old rape victim is ' upholding the law '.
Crassic

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, June 17, 2014 5:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
OMFingG

he thinks this is the rule of law:

I would have taken him out back and cut his nuts off before killing him. I just understand what it takes to protect the rule of law at times




No moron, apparently the only way you can debate me is to not take into account the totality of my remarks. I was suggesting what I would have liked to do to express my dismay at what is sometimes necessary in the process of practicing law.

Have a child explain it to you.

si shen


NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, June 17, 2014 9:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
OMFingG

he thinks this is the rule of law:

I would have taken him out back and cut his nuts off before killing him. I just understand what it takes to protect the rule of law at times



I think perhaps you misinterpreted. There is a difference between how one would act personally, in the heat of the moment, and how they think the system should be maintained.



“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”? Isaac Asimov

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, June 24, 2014 6:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
How fitting that a thread rappy started to claim the right doesn't attack women, has developed into him attacking a woman for providing a constitutionally-ensured defense.

True colors, folks.


After letting it soak in, have you figured out your flaw?

AuRaptor started in the OP pointing out that the Looney Lying LEFTwing Libtards are the actual perpetrators of the War On Women, and now you have repeated that Looney Lying Lefty Libtard Hillary was the one waging War on the poor 12-year-old rape victim. You are either supporting his original point, or are confirming it.

Are you getting the picture? It is not conflicting arguments, but supporting.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, November 20, 2015 12:18 AM

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, November 20, 2015 1:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Brandeis University's Decision To Cancel Ayaan Hirsi Ali Appearance Has Done Liberals No Favors


Yesterday, it suddenly became very important to focus our attention on the upcoming commencement ceremony at Brandeis University -- which is ordinarily something that most of the wide world outside the Brandeis community could frankly give two figs about. But here's what happened. Brandeis had intended to bring author and -- I guess -- "thought leader" Ayaan Hirsi Ali to their commencement festivities, bestow her with an honorary degree and let her speak to students and fellows at a diploma ceremony and a celebratory breakfast.

Well, as of yesterday, all of that is off. In a statement, the Brandeis said: "She is a compelling public figure and advocate for women's rights, and we respect and appreciate her work to protect and defend the rights of women and girls throughout the world ... That said, we cannot overlook certain of her past statements that are inconsistent with Brandeis University's core values."

So, what's all that about? Well, Hirsi Ali is a figure of some controversy, don't you know! She has been a strong voice against such barbaric practices as female genital mutilation, and the more totalitarian aspects of Islamic sharia law that oppress women, such as so-called "honor killings." Personally speaking, I am glad she has done such things. However, she is not of the mind that Islam is a legitimate religion that has been, in some instances, tragically co-opted in some benighted corners of the world by nihilistic death-cults. She does not believe it is possible for a moderate or Westernized form of Islam to exist. She has said so: "There is no moderate Islam." And so, she has called for the complete destruction of Islam existentially.

I do not hold to that view -- in fact, I find it both risible and farcically contrary to my own experiences -- and she will just have to jolly well accept that. But the reverse is also true, and herein lies the problem we have been presented with, thanks to Brandeis University. Whether they know it or not, the actions they have taken have done way more harm than good. To anyone with a liberal-minded attitude toward freedom of expression, Brandeis' decision has done you no favors. Let's break it down, shall we?


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/10/brandeis-ayaan-hirsi-ali_n_51
27792.html





Islam is a religion of peace. That's why Ayaan Hirsi Ali has armed guards, even at über-liberal Occidental College when I saw her speak 2011 - Michael Shermer, Skeptic, Author.



I agree Rappy that the liberals who run our universities and colleges are over the top and hurt the educating of our children. They too often preach an agenda and discourage free thinking. I don't know if this is the case on conservative campuses but I think maybe so.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME