Real World Event Discussions

Iranian nuclear deal

POSTED BY: kpo
UPDATED: Saturday, September 5, 2015 19:44
VIEWED: 4290
PAGE 2 of 4

Thursday, July 16, 2015 9:38 AM

And the mystery shallowenz:

Quote:

David Rhodes began his career in television journalism with Fox News, where he joined as a Production Assistant before the channel launched in October 1996. He eventually became Vice President, News.

In 2008, Rhodes moved to Bloomberg L.P. as Head of U.S. Television.[3] Bloomberg's cable channel underwent a major re-design in 2009.



Prez uv CBS newz sins 2011.

----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.nooalf.com

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, July 17, 2015 3:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JO753:
I saw the last haf owr uv the press conferens.

Obama did a great job uv explaining it. I almost felt bad for Major Garrett wen Obama stepped on him like the bug he iz.

Can you really blame Major? He iz living in the hart uv the Fox eko chamber, so it woud be next to impossible for him to realize wut an idiotic 'question' (propaganda statement, really) he wuz asking The Prezident uv The United States on national television.

If he wuz a real reporter working for a real newz organization, that woud hav been the end uv hiz career. Fox will probably giv him a bonus.


Apparently trying to prove you are delusional, illiterate, and irrational, you forgot to ask Brian Williams, Dan Blather, or Savannah Guthrie who employed a sensible person like Major Garrett. You assumed any reasonable person would be working for Fox, but he is the WH correspondent for CBS - the home of whoppers from the likes of Blather and Williams. Did you see Williams at the Peace Table with Swiftboat Ketchup?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, July 17, 2015 3:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JO753:
I'm shocked!SHOCKED!

Then agen, from Wikipedia:
Quote:

Prior to joining the National Journal he was the senior White House correspondent for the Fox News Channel.


The only explanation that makes sens iz that he wants to go back to Fox.

Not that I know anything about the CBS newz organization. I cant get the channel here. Are they rite wing or possibly trying to be in order to cash in on the abundant idiots?


CBS has not had a News organization in decades. They have many entertainment programs (aka CBS Entertainment Division) that feature actors playing teleprompter readers like Brian Williams and Dan Blather, known around the world for their libtard lies.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, July 17, 2015 7:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Did you see Williams at the Peace Table with Swiftboat Ketchup?


I know thats your attempted insult-name for sumbudy, but you went too far. Who iz Swiftboat Ketchup?



----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.nooalf.com

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, July 17, 2015 6:27 PM

Saudi Arabia is tweaked. Israel is tweaked. Or, at least they say they are for public consumption. Still, I never thought I'd see the day when a US president stopped taking orders, at least publicly, from them.




SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, July 17, 2015 11:27 PM

Good choice. You actually make sense here, but for those who still harbor doubts look at it this way:

If you spring a leak in your home, you hire a good plumber, an expert, to fix it.
The president, the man who makes the decisions (you know, the Decider. Hee, hee)
he goes out and finds himself the best there is when it comes to Nukes.

He sought out Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, a Nuclear Physicist and former MIT professor. You can't get any better than that when it comes to Nukes, and he's widely accepted by both Dems and Repubs as the best in the business. Smart man that Obama, he goes out and gets the best. He wound up his Moniz wind-up toy and pointed him in the direction of the Iranians. And now we have a good deal.

Iran can't make a bomb or the sanctions will be immediately imposed. The whole 24 days to inspection that everyone, including Fox's Nuclear scientist Bill O'Reilly, is complaining about. Well, it's utter BULLSHIT! You can't turn off uranium like a lightbulb, that's why you hire those special "plumbers" that will find those special "leaks." the I.A.E.A. specialize in sniffing out uranium. So those critics have to eat shit if they think they're smarter than these guys that do this for a living.

Bill O'Reilly will have to stick with his day job and "report" the news. Oh and Cheney has some balls to open his mouth to say anything negative about the deal. Both he and Bush-lite allowed Iran to go from practically no centrifuges to nearly 6,000. So Cheney should shut his pie hole and go back to his rocking chair and let the grown-ups handle this. They're just pissed that a black man was able to do what they couldn't do in a million years. It's called Diplomacy, Dick! You must have missed that class.


SGG

Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
http://www.vox.com/2015/4/2/8336219/iran-nuclear-deal-plain-english

Critics are out knocking it, as they were always going to, but it looks like a reasonable deal from what I've read. And it's hard to overstate how much better this deal is than war with Iran.

One of Pres Obama's most significant achievements to date (and there have been many)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, July 18, 2015 3:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JO753:
Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Did you see Williams at the Peace Table with Swiftboat Ketchup?


I know thats your attempted insult-name for sumbudy, but you went too far. Who iz Swiftboat Ketchup?


Sorry it was not spoon- fed for those who don't watch the news.

Secretary of State Swiftboat Ketchup.
He claimed to be a Vietnam hero, swindling his way into the Swiftboat unit because they never came into combat, never came within range of gunfire. Then the mission changed and Swiftboat units were integrally engaged in gunfire with the enemy - so JFK stuck a piece of eggshell into his eye, to get a Purple Heart which qualified him to be reassigned outside of the theater of combat. His fellow Swiftboat veterans thought that he had gone to prison when he disappeared, and still thought he should be in Leavenworth in 2004.
His funding for his 2004 run for President came thru marrying the widow of the sole heir of the Heinz fortune. H. John Heinz III was a Republican.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, July 18, 2015 3:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shinygoodguy:
Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
http://www.vox.com/2015/4/2/8336219/iran-nuclear-deal-plain-english

Critics are out knocking it, as they were always going to, but it looks like a reasonable deal from what I've read. And it's hard to overstate how much better this deal is than war with Iran.

One of Pres Obama's most significant achievements to date (and there have been many)


Good choice. You actually make sense here, but for those who still harbor doubts look at it this way:

And now we have a good deal.

Iran can't make a bomb or the sanctions will be immediately imposed. The whole 24 days to inspection that everyone, including Fox's Nuclear scientist Bill O'Reilly, is complaining about. Well, it's utter BULLSHIT! You can't turn off uranium like a lightbulb,


SGG


So in your expert opinion, IF Iran agrees to allow the requested inspection within 24 days, nobody in the world can make any evidence of production go away - it will be there forever, or more than 3 months, or more than 24 days.
In your expert opinion, how many days is needed for evidence of violations to be cleaned up? Or do you claim never?
In your expert opinion, if the production facility is moved out of the targeted inspection site, how many days or hours is needed to accomplish this? Or do you claim never?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, July 19, 2015 1:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:

Originally posted by Shinygoodguy:
Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
http://www.vox.com/2015/4/2/8336219/iran-nuclear-deal-plain-english

Critics are out knocking it, as they were always going to, but it looks like a reasonable deal from what I've read. And it's hard to overstate how much better this deal is than war with Iran.

One of Pres Obama's most significant achievements to date (and there have been many)


Good choice. You actually make sense here, but for those who still harbor doubts look at it this way:

And now we have a good deal.

Iran can't make a bomb or the sanctions will be immediately imposed. The whole 24 days to inspection that everyone, including Fox's Nuclear scientist Bill O'Reilly, is complaining about. Well, it's utter BULLSHIT! You can't turn off uranium like a lightbulb,


SGG


So in your expert opinion, IF Iran agrees to allow the requested inspection within 24 days, nobody in the world can make any evidence of production go away - it will be there forever, or more than 3 months, or more than 24 days.
In your expert opinion, how many days is needed for evidence of violations to be cleaned up? Or do you claim never?
In your expert opinion, if the production facility is moved out of the targeted inspection site, how many days or hours is needed to accomplish this? Or do you claim never?



???

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, July 19, 2015 3:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Secretary of State Swiftboat Ketchup.



Sooo...John Kerry?

I didnt pay much attention to politics back then. Bunch uv rich guyz fiting over who gets to steal my money befor I ever see it.

But, apparently you havent been paying any attention either:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kerry_military_service_controversy

Quote:

Their campaign against Kerry's presidential bid received widespread publicity,[1] but was later discredited and gave rise to the neologism "swiftboating", to describe an unfair or untrue political attack.[2][3] Defenders of John Kerry's service record, including nearly all of his former crewmates, have stated that SBVT's allegations are false



----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.nooalf.com

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME