Voted for Bush - voted for war, death, and lies. Voted for Bush - voted for war, death, and lies. Voted for Bush - voted for war, death, and lies. Voted for Bush - voted for war, death, and lies.
POSTED BY: Ghoulman
UPDATED: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 02:38
VIEWED: 5882
PAGE 2 of 3
Ahh, Ghoulman...I just never tire of your amusing hyperventilations over a situation that you can't affect.
_______________________________________________
I wish I had a magical wish-granting plank.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Here's my out of blue good-point-post of the week.................
Democrats, Republicans, Independents.....
who cares?...the rest of the world will bomb us all equally, not sort us through a line asking "democrat? Republican?" before giving us a nuclear surprise....
"Your mouth is talking. Might wanna see to that"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
One thing I know is this - sooner or later a lot of people who voted for Bush will have their ox gored.
Hmm. Ox gored? I'm not entirely sure what this means. But it sounds like someone wants an assassination, perhaps?
And another point - The Democartic Party, from the presidential race, all the way down to county and city levels, waged ugly, personal campaigns. The Republicans took the high road and showed the facts: the RECORDS of the opponent, not their PERSONAL feelings or whatever.
And they say conservatives aren't rational.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
^^^ "Ox gored" is one of those politcal code phrases. I believe it refers to any animal who has gone mad and attacks his own kind.
Really people, if you don't know what your talking about don't advertise your ignorance.
Quote:
Originally posted by InevitableBetrayal:
Ahh, Ghoulman...I just never tire of your amusing hyperventilations over a situation that you can't affect.
Even athiests believe in the power of prayer.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:??? I'm not sure what you mean here.
Originally posted by tethys:
Here's my out of blue good-point-post of the week.................
Democrats, Republicans, Independents.....
who cares?...the rest of the world will bomb us all equally, not sort us through a line asking "democrat? Republican?" before giving us a nuclear surprise....
"Your mouth is talking. Might wanna see to that"
... you do know it's impossible to use a nuclear device on the US or it's allies right? You've heard of detente?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by GinoBiffaroni:
That is another GOOD point, I also think where that election when wonky was in the nomination process.
Now, how different ( if any differance ) would you have voted ( even if you can't vote ) if say the presidental nominations had gone like :
Republican : Senator John McCain
http://mccain.senate.gov/
Democrat : Ret General Wesley Clark
http://www.nato.int/cv/saceur/clark.htm
Both ( In my opinion anyway ) would have made excellent canidates, far better than Bush or Kerry.
Now with no, I hate Kerry / I hate Bush dynamic, who would be better here... and is their anyone else who might be better yet ?
" Don't Blame Me I Voted For Kudos "
I voted for Kudos too!
*WHIP CRACK!*
I love those guys, and Kudos too... but I am not a fan of the current neoconservative/neofascist allience of the Reps and the Dems. Personally, I think they are in ideological cahoots and neither is a worthy party. even with the good fellows you mention above, especially McCain (love that guy!), thier parties are far too in bed with the corporate fascist agenda or Military Industrial Complex (depends) and such.
Ralph Nader is a fantastic candidate who loves America and could take the nation into it's strongest years... instead the American Empire is crumbling before our eyes.
It's funny the right wingers are making so much fun of the various people and POVs against Bush when the signs of the end of the American Empire is plainly here... thanks to Bush/Cheney.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Ghoulman:
Ralph Nader - the last sane man in America!
I'd hate to contradict in a thread that actually tells of... gasp, thought (
), but Nader is no sane man.I saw an interview with this guy and he wanted to pull out of Iraq. Ok, nothing insane so far, until you look at the time frame... 6 months! What this would do is basically blackmail the rest of the world (especially Europe) to pick the slack and clean up the US's mess.
Yes, he has good ideas, but then he twists them into a horror. Doesn't exactly sound sane to me.
----
"Canada being mad at you is like Mr. Rogers throwing a brick through your window." -Jon Stewart, The Daily Show
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by aeronstorm:
And another point - The Democartic Party, from the presidential race, all the way down to county and city levels, waged ugly, personal campaigns. The Republicans took the high road and showed the facts: the RECORDS of the opponent, not their PERSONAL feelings or whatever.
And they say conservatives aren't rational.
The REPUBLICANS took the high road???
What do they smoke on this planet you're from?
And do the televisions there pick up anything besides the FoxNews channel?
Compare the two conventions and get back to me.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
... you do know it's impossible to use a nuclear device on the US or it's allies right? You've heard of detente?"
Surely you're joking. You're assuming that the people who'd set off a nuke here (terrorists) would value human life over and above making their point, which we've seen over and over again is not the case. Detente doesn't really affect the fringe groups who'd actually use a nuke, dude.
Besides, at least historically, (apart from the current administration, which just finds somebody with oil --who isn't Saudi Arabia-- to blame) we wouldn't go nuking another country if it was a terrorist organization and not a nation that attacked us.
But it isn't going to be a nuke, anyway. Nukes are expensive and hard to come by even on the black market. It'll be a chemical or biological weapon set off in some large public transportation area, where they can get maximum spreading and affect the largest number of people.
Impossible? You're dreaming, and it's a dangerous, dangerous dream.
Therre is no such thing as a weed.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I think they're smoking something they found in Afghanistan.
"Fighting narcotics is equivalent to fighting terrorism,"
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041119/ap_on_re_as/un_af
ghanistan_opium_10
Soon enough, we'll have expanded our influence over what we hate to include every country. Our allies are abandoning us. Let's try and focus, America. We are not the moral leaders of the world. I wish we'd stop acting the part.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME