Saddam Hussein was NOT a threat
POSTED BY: Ghoulman
UPDATED: Monday, October 18, 2004 20:09
VIEWED: 12413
PAGE 4 of 6
Quote:
Originally posted by SignyM:
So Jim, any comments on the post by Rue and myself?
OK, I'll stop. *chuckle*
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Ghoulman:
^^^ Sorry Jimnightshade but I am rather comfortable with the belief you are sitting in a Texas campaign office and not a "computer company". lol !
And I love your twisted logic... are you related to the Bushes?
You really think I am an a campaign office? Hehe. Thats funny. I do not, nor have not worked for a campaign office. Does everyone that disagrees with you "work for the campaign office"? You have no idea how wrong you are.
This post has gone from political discussion to personal attacks by way of name calling and uninformed accusations, from you, as to what I do for a living. You are a democrat through and through. You are the one who should work for a campaign office. Go snowboarding when weather permits, it's a good way to rid yourself of that stress.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
^^^ if I'm wrong I apologize. Which is all you had to say. 
And once again... you seem to have misrepresented a fact - I'm Canadian and can't possibly be a democrate.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JimNightshade:Quote:
Originally posted by Ghoulman:
^^^ well, you missed all the discussion on Fireflyfans.net regarding that very issue so it's rather obvious you aren't a Firefly fan from this fan site.
Besides, you've admitted you do work for the Reps. If you had only stated that openly you would be free and clear to put forth your agenda as a representative of that party. Which is fine and perfectly ethical.
But you didn't...
And I have attacked Democrats for doing the same thing on this forum. Funny, they were apologetic and didn't insult me, my country, or spit hateful things like you have.
Sorry Jim, but I will not put up with someone who misrepresents themselves.
That doesn't make me the bad guy. Does it?
What? I dont work for any politcal party. I work for a computer company. Where did you get that from?
You yet again are showing that you misread and you yourself lie about the facts. And you are the one spewing hateful words at others. Read above. I keep my personal feelings out of these discussions. How is acknowledging Canada as a premiere snowboading locale an insult?
No one here is the bad guy. Or is anyone in disagreement with you a "bad" guy?
Sigh. Read above. I did say :)
Would you not vote for Kerry if you lived here?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Would you concede that a madman in power IS a weapon of mass destruction?
Vilavon AKA Claude
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JimNightshade:
You really think I am an a campaign office? Hehe. Thats funny. I do not, nor have not worked for a campaign office.
I'll take that as a none answer. Close enough for me. "... nor have not" ... really cute.
But hey, if you say you work for.. a "computer company" (snark!) that's fine.
Quote:
Originally posted by JimNightshade:
Would you not vote for Kerry if you lived here?
Nader. He's a remarkable fellow. I greatly enjoyed his speach to the Canadian University crowd recently on , er, the Canadian Cspan. However, given that Bush is a dangerous criminal I'd have to vote for Kerry even if I do think he's a status quo guy. At least Democrates aren't known for murdering people in the tens of thousands. Good enough for me.
AND - You seem to have forgotten, once again, that this very thread opposes the Democratic position.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Vilavon:
Would you concede that a madman in power IS a weapon of mass destruction?
Vilavon AKA Claude
Who me? Well, madmen aren't a concern if they are without weapons. They can jibber to themselves all they like. Kinda like Nixon.
To quote Nixon (Re: Vietnam): "Nuke 'em! Nuke 'em all!"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Ruxton:
Jimnightshade:
First, Saddam did NOT use gas against his own people. The gas used was verified to have been Iranian, not Iraqi gas. Colin Powell still lies about this.
This is an interesting point Ruxton (you always have those!) and I too have been confounded by details regarding the Kurds who were gassed to death in the streets of HALABJA back in 1988.
Does anyone really know?
I know that the current theory is that it was Iran. I believe the US Army originated this theory? Not sure.
What type of gas? Sarin gas I'm told. But the Iranians didn't have that available did they? Besides, the Iranians don't have a beef with the Kurds. But, I have heard it said it was simply an accident.
I don't buy any of that myself. Mainly because I can remember when all that happend, having been alive and in college in 1988. Ok, Art school.. shut up!
Anyho', it's difficult to say but the incident was always reported as a crime of the Saddam Regime.
As far as I know, this information is "new". And let's face it, any info out of Iraq in 1988 was specious at best.
What do you think?
Oh, for those who don't know the importance - GWB used this horrible incident in his speach to justify his invasion of Iraq. Rather like he does everything... *chuckle*
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Jim- any comments on my post or Rue's? Just curious.
And Ghoulman...
SHUSH! You're frightening the cows and chickens! We won't get any milk or eggs for a week!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME