Donald Trump Has Been Indicted And Yes Arrested; Four Times Now And Counting. I was Right
POSTED BY: THG
UPDATED: Wednesday, August 19, 2026 03:20
VIEWED: 50875
PAGE 77 of 96
'Ghosts' from Trump's past 'are coming back to haunt him' as lawsuit gets new life: report
A lawsuit that was launched in 2020 against then-President Donald Trump and his administration accusing them of unconstitutionally clearing racial justice protesters at Lafayette Square Park by using chemical irritants, including tear gas, before Trump used the area for a photo op holding a bible, could come back to haunt the former president.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ghosts-from-trump-s-past-are-c
oming-back-to-haunt-him-as-lawsuit-gets-new-life-report/ar-BB1kLV7o?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=e8e9618c3dfb41b0ae50e90a93fdccd6&ei=21
This guy isn't fit to follow circus animals around and scoop up their shit. And neither is anyone who would vote for him.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump seeks delay of hush money trial over 'prejudicial' press coverage, as he slams the case
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-seeks-delay-of-hush-mone
y-trial-over-prejudicial-press-coverage-as-he-slams-the-case/ar-BB1kTTxp?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=eae13a318ad446a488bb8c057aef72f6&ei=71
The trial starts in two weeks donnie. And it's a criminal trial.
tick tock
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
History says otherwise donnie.
T
Trump Says You Should Never Be Tired Of Winning
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Trump seeks delay of hush money trial over 'prejudicial' press coverage, as he slams the case
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-seeks-delay-of-hush-mone
y-trial-over-prejudicial-press-coverage-as-he-slams-the-case/ar-BB1kTTxp?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=eae13a318ad446a488bb8c057aef72f6&ei=71
The trial starts in two weeks donnie. And it's a criminal trial.
tick tock
T
'Remains to be seen' how Hope Hicks will testify in Trump's hush money trial
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Grossly obsessed with the man you are.
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Judge Aileen Cannon (appointed by Trump in his final month) is behaving extremely predictably . . . for a Trumptard, but not in the least like a judge. Trump knew he'd eventually need a judge in his pocket, so he appointed the best one (or a judge completely loyal to Trump) for his legal needs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aileen_Cannon
Prosecutors in Trump’s classified documents case chide judge over her ‘fundamentally flawed’ order
by ERIC TUCKER, Associated Press - 04/03/24 7:19 AM ET
https://thehill.com/homenews/ap/ap-politics/ap-prosecutors-in-trumps-c
lassified-documents-case-chide-judge-over-her-fundamentally-flawed-order/
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors chided the judge presiding over former President Donald Trump’s classified documents case in Florida, warning her off potential jury instructions that they said rest on a “fundamentally flawed legal premise.”
In an unusual order, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon had asked prosecutors and defense lawyers to file proposed jury instructions for most of the charges even though it remains unclear when the case might reach trial. She asked the lawyers to respond to competing interpretations of the law that appeared to accept the Republican ex-president’s argument that he was entitled under a statute known as the Presidential Records Act to retain the sensitive documents he is now charged with possessing.
The order surprised legal experts and alarmed special counsel Jack Smith’s team, which said in a filing late Tuesday that that 1978 law — which requires presidents to return presidential records to the government upon leaving office but permits them to retain purely personal ones — has no relevance in a case concerning highly classified documents.
Those records, prosecutors said, were clearly not personal and there is no evidence Trump ever designated them as such. They said that the suggestion he did so was “invented” only after it became public that he had taken with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, after his presidency boxes of records from the White House and that none of the witnesses they interviewed in the investigation support his argument.
“Not a single one had heard Trump say that he was designating records as personal or that, at the time he caused the transfer of boxes to Mar-a-Lago, he believed that his removal of records amounted to designating them as personal under the PRA,” prosecutors wrote. “To the contrary, every witness who was asked this question had never heard such a thing.”
Smith’s team said that if the judge insists on citing the presidential records law in her jury instructions, she should let the lawyers know as soon as possible so they can appeal.
The filing reflects continued exasperation by prosecutors at Cannon’s handling of the case.
The Trump-appointed judge has yet to rule on multiple defense motions to dismiss the case as well as other disagreements between the two sides, and the trial date remains in flux, suggesting that a prosecution that Smith’s team has said features overwhelming evidence could remain unresolved by the time of the November presidential election.
Cannon, who earlier faced blistering criticism over her decision to grant Trump’s request for an independent arbiter to review documents obtained during an FBI search of Mar-a-Lago, heard arguments last month on two of Trump’s motions to dismiss the case: that the Presidential Records Act permitted him to designate the documents as personal and that he was therefore permitted to retain them.
The judge appeared skeptical of that position but did not immediately rule. Days later, she asked the two sides to craft jury instructions that responded to the following premise: “A president has sole authority under the PRA to categorize records as personal or presidential during his/her presidency. Neither a court nor a jury is permitted to make or review such a categorization decision.”
An outgoing president’s decision to exclude personal records from those returned to the government, she continued, “constit
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I noticed, THUGR, that you're trying to leave behind the stupid shit you posted in the "Deadly lung disease" thread...
Quote:
THUGR: our spewing shit and acting as though you have a brain always makes me laugh. Remember Brexit; you were all for it. Again as always comrade signym you showed your stupidity.
to which I replied
Quote:
SIGNY: So, THUGR, are you saying that I'm wrong about Trump's Executive Order?
And are you saying that you're FOR unrestricted illegal immigration?
Just to clarify where you stand on the issues.
And stay on- topic.
http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=65965
Despite more prompts you still haven't answered the question.
You're just a troll, THUGR. Not worth attention no matter how many times you bump your own threads.
Tick tock
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger
Why SECOND'S posts are brainless: "I clocked how much time: no more than 10 minutes per day. With cut-and-paste (Ctrl C and Ctrl V) and AI, none of this takes much time."
Or, any verification or thought.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME