Real World Event Discussions

I would not care if Hunter Biden embezzled zillions and had relations with a dead donkey on film.

POSTED BY: WISHIMAY
UPDATED: Sunday, July 21, 2024 15:23
VIEWED: 16083
PAGE 11 of 22

Wednesday, October 21, 2020 2:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Also, why has the FBI been hiding this evidence from Congress, particularly during the time Obiden was lying to Congress? If they had determined it was fake, they could have just said so, instead of hiding it from a genuine Investigative body.

And why have Joe Biden and Hunter Biden (and lawyers) not stated clearly that the emails are not real, the laptop is not Hunter's?

When asked about it, they just say they can't talk about it, and they divert by siccing the Fake News on the computer store guy, or on Rudy, or on anybody else they can think of.

That answer is almost as obvious as not being able to answer if Joe will stack SCOTUS.

Trump threatens to fire the FBI director for NOT accusing Biden, but instead accusing the Russians of faking the emails.

www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/christopher-wray-fbi-trump-430243

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, October 22, 2020 3:35 AM

Holy shit!







NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, October 22, 2020 4:20 AM

Rudy Giuliani’s Initial Claim That He ‘Foiled’ Sacha Baron Cohen’s ‘Borat’ Prank Appears to Have Fallen Apart
https://lawandcrime.com/awkward/rudy-giulianis-initial-claims-about-ha
ving-foiled-sacha-baron-cohens-borat-prank-appear-to-have-fallen-apart
/

You can't make this stuff up!


NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, October 22, 2020 6:46 AM

How cringeworthy!

When he starts colluding with corrupt Chinese nationals for $1.5 billion, let me know!

*****

Yanno, I've been wondering if this is in any way related to Hillary's bleach-bitted emails. Supposedly,

Quote:

All but four of the 30,490 emails from Hillary Clinton’s unauthorized email server were forwarded to a private Google email address featuring a name similar to a Chinese company, according to documents released by a Senate committee on Aug. 15.

Virtually every email that was sent to and from the Clinton-email server was forwarded to “carterheavyindustries@gmail.com,” which raised concerns that a foreign actor gained access to Clinton’s emails after an intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) investigator searched Google for “Carter Heavy Industries” and came up with a result for Shandong Carter Heavy Industry Co., Ltd, according to the documents (pdf).

Shandong Carter Heavy Industry is a Chinese manufacturer of excavators and heavy machinery. The company did not respond to a request for comment.

Frank Rucker, the ICIG investigator, and Jeanette McMillian, an ICIG attorney, told the FBI about the anomaly on Feb. 18, 2016, at a meeting which included Peter Strzok, who had just taken over as the section chief heading the investigation. Rucker told Congress that Strzok was “aloof and dismissive” and didn’t ask many questions.


https://www.theepochtimes.com/hillary-clintons-emails-were-sent-to-gma
il-address-with-a-chinese-companys-name_3043380.html


Wouldn't it be funny if it was the Chinese collecting kompromat on Democrats instead of the Russians?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, October 23, 2020 3:51 AM

Please use legitimate sources, not trashy reichwing crap, Russian troll.

Overall, we rate The Epoch Times borderline Questionable and Right Biased based on editorial positions that consistently favor the right. We also rate them factually Mixed due to the publication of pseudoscience and the promotion of pro-Trump propaganda and conspiracy theories as well as failed fact checks.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-epoch-times/


NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, October 23, 2020 3:52 AM




NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, October 23, 2020 11:55 AM

Pure Biden win.




NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, October 23, 2020 12:13 PM

lol

To say your opinion is biased to the extreme is not doing it justice.

Nobody cares about your opinion Marcos, or whoever it is you're letting do all the thinking for you these days.



BTW... it's bad when the WSJ comes out and prints a story about your guy like this.



https://www.wsj.com/articles/now-corruption-story-is-about-joe-not-hun
ter-11603392288?mod=djemalertNEWS


Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, October 23, 2020 1:06 PM

Quote:

We also rate them factually Mixed due to the publication of pseudoscience and the promotion of pro-Trump propaganda and conspiracy theories


Gentle reader, may I point out that "Trump colluded with Russia" and "Trump offered Ukraine a 'quid pro quo'" and "Hunter Biden's laptop is Russian disinformation" are three of the whackiest conspiracy theories ever to grace major publications?

Why is it that when someone notices that a cabal of elected and unelected officials of the USA government conducted a politically-motivated campaign of spying and disinformation it's called a "conspiracy theory", but when the M$M prints conspiracy theories they're called "facts"?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, October 24, 2020 8:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

We also rate them factually Mixed due to the publication of pseudoscience and the promotion of pro-Trump propaganda and conspiracy theories


Gentle reader, may I point out that "Trump colluded with Russia" and "Trump offered Ukraine a 'quid pro quo'" and "Hunter Biden's laptop is Russian disinformation" are three of the whackiest conspiracy theories ever to grace major publications?

Why is it that when someone notices that a cabal of elected and unelected officials of the USA government conducted a politically-motivated campaign of spying and disinformation it's called a "conspiracy theory", but when the M$M prints conspiracy theories they're called "facts"?



Actually, it checks out.


NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME