Breoanna Taylor Details Discussion
POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Saturday, August 24, 2024 00:52
VIEWED: 6810
PAGE 8 of 9
Quote:Neither one of them did a damn thing.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Black Bonnie would still be alive if she wasn't fucking Black Clyde.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The racist mask comes off.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Not a single one of these shitstains that BLM has been burning shit down for are worth the paper their death certificates were printed on.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
How did you become a racist? Were you taught your hate by your hillbilly parents? Did daddy get drunk and smack you around a bit?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:And that makes mistakes much more likely. And the funny thing is, it's INNOCENT people who get killed in these kinds of mistakes, because the guilty ... well, they already have a good idea who's breaking down their door.
SIX: Black Bonnie would still be alive if she wasn't fucking Black Clyde.
SIGNY: as far as I can tell, Walker is completely not involved, or even potentially involved, in any of the alleged drug-money handling going on. (No drugs or money was found on the scene.) Seems like he was just trying to protect his g/f. He called 911, after all, assuming that criminals were breaking in.
*****
IF the warrant had not been executed at 1 AM but at a more reasonable time ... say, 1 PM ... chances are the residents would have already been awake. Not jolted awake by someone pounding on the door shouting incomprehensible things. But no knock and quick knock warrants are almost always served at night ... why? ... causing a compounding of potential errors.
So imagine this: The warrant is served at 1PM. The police knock on the door. Taylor and/or Walker answer the door, the police present the warrant. The residents ask to see badges, and then let the cops in. (Remember, no drugs or money was found on the scene, so there would be no reason to keep the cops out.)
Alternatively, the residents refuse to open the door, and - after some negotiation- the police bust it down. But there is no confusion as to who is on the other side of the door.
SIX: They intentionally do them when they will most likely catch the people unawares.
Quote:
SIX: If there is a heads up, that allows time for destruction of evidence
But all the while you were saying no knock raids make policing "safer". Now you're saying it's about the collection of evidence.
So, which is it?
The no knock/ quick knock raids are promoted by JUDGES, PROSECUTORS, AND DISTRICT ATTORNEYS, not by police. Judges will often convert regular warrants without even being asked.
Here's the way I see it: If you're making meth, or distributing cocaine or heroin, or have any significant amount of drug money or illegal weapons around, there's going to be so much STUFF around ... weigh scales, cornstarch, solvents, caustic compounds, wads of cash, etc etc, there's NO WAY you can dispose of that kind of evidence in ten minutes. This isn't like throwing a dime bag down the john.
And if the police truly believe that there is a crime being committed on the property right at that moment, they can dispense with a warrant completely and break in on "exigent circumstances".
So what's the purpose of a no-knock warrant?
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I just want to point out how much contradictory nonsense has been posted here, based - AS USUAL - on nothing.
I looked for a copy of the search warrant. Whose name was on it? What did it claim? Supposedly it was released and 'news' 'sources' have written all sorts of stories with WHAT THEY CLAIM it was about - though the stories don't match each other. Was Taylor on it, or not? Was Walker on it, or not? Was it a 'place' warrant? Did those 'news' 'sources' link the original? NOPE.
Did the cops knock and announce themselves? Did Walker reply? If there's bodycam recordings of that time period they haven't been released either. But the lack of actual knowledge certainly hasn't kept people from arguing all sorts of mutating ignorance.
Did Walker shoot? Did Taylor shoot? Gunshot residue testing would answer the question! Was that test even done?
What was the physical layout? If it wasn't for me stumbling across a several second clip from VICE tv after the shooting I'd have no idea! Having read ALL the arguments here, I can tell you - YOU WERE ALL WRONG! But that didn't keep you from endlessly posting your ignorance. second clip https://www.tmz.com/2020/09/26/breonna-taylor-crime-scene-aftermath-bo
dy-cam-footage-released/
Jeeze, just get a grip, already. Don't start with your opinions to be followed by a quest for matching evidence.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I remain correct, and thoroughly vindicated, yet again.
The next few days will be eventful.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I agree, KIKI.
For a thread about "Breoanna Taylor Details" it's awfully short of .... details.
SIX, for example, claims that Walker shot thru the door. If so, the door should have a bullet-hole in it.
He then goes on to assume that the police shot back through the door. If THAT were the case, then the door should be riddled with bullet holes. But that would violate police policy, which is not to shoot unless there is a clear line of sight.
Forme, the critical missing detail is .... how much time elapsed between when the police announced themselves and when they broke the door down. Since Walker called 911, it's clear that he thought it was a criminal breaking down the door. What can you hear in the background? Was 911 able to advise him that it was the police at the door? Howit is that Taylor was hit, and not Walker? So many unanswered questions. The data is for sure available, but not to the public.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
That's because Russian trolls and 6ix come here and spew bullshit they got off their Nazi websites and try to pass it off as somehow factual.
You're a bunch of pathetic losers, and you lost, yet again.
My facts always crush your fiction.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I changed the title to add "Discussion"
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I agree, KIKI.
For a thread about "Breoanna Taylor Details" it's awfully short of .... details.
SIX, for example, claims that Walker shot thru the door. If so, the door should have a bullet-hole in it.
He then goes on to assume that the police shot back through the door. If THAT were the case, then the door should be riddled with bullet holes. But that would violate police policy, which is not to shoot unless there is a clear line of sight.
Forme, the critical missing detail is .... how much time elapsed between when the police announced themselves and when they broke the door down. Since Walker called 911, it's clear that he thought it was a criminal breaking down the door. What can you hear in the background? Was 911 able to advise him that it was the police at the door? Howit is that Taylor was hit, and not Walker? So many unanswered questions. The data is for sure available, but not to the public.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I tried to base my posts on factual data, when available. The best info I had was the transcript following the Grand Jury Indictments. I found and posted that in it's entirety, eventually.
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
I just want to point out how much contradictory nonsense has been posted here, based - AS USUAL - on nothing.
Thanks for finding the video footage.
Quote:I assumed a layout diagram of the scene would have been part of the Grand Jury proceeding, but all indications are that Grand Jury documents are not scheduled to be released.
I looked for a copy of the search warrant. Whose name was on it? What did it claim? Supposedly it was released and 'news' 'sources' have written all sorts of stories with WHAT THEY CLAIM it was about - though the stories don't match each other. Was Taylor on it, or not? Was Walker on it, or not? Was it a 'place' warrant? Did those 'news' 'sources' link the original? NOPE.
Did the cops knock and announce themselves? Did Walker reply? If there's bodycam recordings of that time period they haven't been released either. But the lack of actual knowledge certainly hasn't kept people from arguing all sorts of mutating ignorance.
Did Walker shoot? Did Taylor shoot? Gunshot residue testing would answer the question! Was that test even done?
What was the physical layout? If it wasn't for me stumbling across a several second clip from VICE tv after the shooting I'd have no idea! Having read ALL the arguments here, I can tell you - YOU WERE ALL WRONG! But that didn't keep you from endlessly posting your ignorance. second clip https://www.tmz.com/2020/09/26/breonna-taylor-crime-scene-aftermath-bo
dy-cam-footage-released/
Jeeze, just get a grip, already. Don't start with your opinions to be followed by a quest for matching evidence.
That story you linked stated that SWAT arrived AFTER the entire incident occurred!!! Oh, sure, now that everybody is dead and all the guns are empty, let's bring in the SWAT?? WTF??
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
JSF
Your error, imo, is that you settled on extremely fragmented and nearly absent information when you prematurely made up your mind about who did what, and so, who deserved what. Taylor and Walker - guilty and deserving of whatever the police did to them. "Live by the sword, die by the sword." All we've heard so far is the intro. The entire story has yet to be told.
You make that mistake OFTEN. And are ultimately proved wrong OFTEN. So often in fact that I think you have personal agendas that're not at all hidden behind your pretext at being neutral and information-based. And the information you accept, and close your mind with, is information you cherry-pick specifically to support your agendas.
And then, when FACTS prove you wrong, you refuse to admit you were wrong, and as a result change your mind. Which is why, for example, you still cling to fables about HIV 40 years after they were proved wrong.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME