Real World Event Discussions

USA Republicans cheer for Italy GiorgiaMelon neo-Fascist. What happened to 'Americans firstly '

POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Thursday, July 23, 2026 04:44
VIEWED: 16114
PAGE 4 of 20

Monday, April 24, 2017 9:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
You see it correctly SSG. To date, Trump has been the biggest liar, flip flopper, and person who indulges in hypocrisy I've ever seen. I was not gloating. I was pointing out the facts and giving voice my concerns.

They're looking to deflect from Trump. Therefore they shift the conversation from Trump to me. If they didn't they would have to address all of Trumps failings.



What failings?

You've had it out for the guy since day one. You're still mad about the pussy grabbing thing.

The only disappointments I've had with him so far is that he's done a few things that Hillary would have already done.


He's the first president ever that got China to ignore North Korea. The TPP isn't a thing we're involved in. He has been ripping up quite a few of Obama's executive orders and particularly been making inroads on 2nd amendment protections.

It's hard to imagine he can get any work done with all the hysterical animals like you bandying about and spewing shit everywhere.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, April 24, 2017 9:35 PM

Quote:

You see it correctly SSG. To date, Trump has been the biggest liar, flip flopper, and person who indulges in hypocrisy I've ever seen. I was not gloating. I was pointing out the facts and giving voice my concerns.

They're looking to deflect from Trump. Therefore they shift the conversation from Trump to me. If they didn't they would have to address all of Trumps failings. = THUGR

You see it INcorrectly, SGG. And THUGR.

Just as I have three hopes for Trump's administration, I had three for Obama: universal health care, meaningful economic repair, and an end to our ceaseless interventions everywhere. (He DID vote against the Iraq War, unlike Hillary)

The first inkling I had that Obama might be "more of the same" instead of "hope and change" "changing the way Washington works" was his appointment of Timmy Geithner as Treasury Secy. Obama had a historic oppty to be Roosevelt v.2 - the worst crash since 1929, a Democratic Congress - and he blew it. IF he had done something to help people instead of banks, Congress would have remained Democratic. Instead of learning that lesson, the DNC continued representing wealth.

My SECOND indication that Obama was "more of the same" was when he spoke on the tarmac of some unremarkable air base about "indefinite preventive detention". That should make anyone's blood run cold.

My THIRD hint that Obama was "more of the same" was when he flubbed health insurance, and for me this was one of THE issues of my vote. He first yanked single payer off the table and then by took away public option, after promising it in his second State of the Union (which BTW happens in January or February) .... a full year into his first term. I was angry, but I thought ... well, it's a complicated bill with a lot of moving parts. Let's see what happens.

But I was willing to give Obama a chance. I didn't decide against him until fairly far into his first term. It takes a long time to actually DO anything substantive, and not just speechify or tweet.

From the moment Trump was elected he faced an intransigent half of the population, but worse- an implacable deep state willing to "leak" lies and an compliant press willing to spray anything anywhere. Yes, Obama faced a lot of hostility, but it was not spread by the MSM.

So, I'm willing to wait and see what happens. I'm going to give Trump a chance, like I gave Obama a chance. My expectations are very low. As I have posted many times before, I voted for Trump for three things:

Reducing illegal immigration
Ending "free trade" deals
An end to our pointless hostility to Russia. I was hoping this would mean less "interventionism" abroad in general.

So far he's made progress on two of them and went way backwards on the third, but it's too early to speak of "failure", just as it would be too early to speak of "failure" for Obama.

I CAN talk about my concerns.

-----------

"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake

THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, April 24, 2017 10:56 PM

Funny SIG. As I pointed out in an earlier thread. Being a Russian troll you would first argue why Trump should be president, and you did. Then, you would criticize him because after all, you are a Russian sympathizer, and he is president of the United States. It's pretty cut and dry comrade.



Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

You see it correctly SSG. To date, Trump has been the biggest liar, flip flopper, and person who indulges in hypocrisy I've ever seen. I was not gloating. I was pointing out the facts and giving voice my concerns.

They're looking to deflect from Trump. Therefore they shift the conversation from Trump to me. If they didn't they would have to address all of Trumps failings. = THUGR

You see it INcorrectly, SGG. And THUGR.

Just as I have three hopes for Trump's administration, I had three for Obama: universal health care, meaningful economic repair, and an end to our ceaseless interventions everywhere. (He DID vote against the Iraq War, unlike Hillary)

The first inkling I had that Obama might be "more of the same" instead of "hope and change" "changing the way Washington works" was his appointment of Timmy Geithner as Treasury Secy. Obama had a historic oppty to be Roosevelt v.2 - the worst crash since 1929, a Democratic Congress - and he blew it. IF he had done something to help people instead of banks, Congress would have remained Democratic. Instead of learning that lesson, the DNC continued representing wealth.

My SECOND indication that Obama was "more of the same" was when he spoke on the tarmac of some unremarkable air base about "indefinite preventive detention". That should make anyone's blood run cold.

My THIRD hint that Obama was "more of the same" was when he flubbed health insurance, and for me this was one of THE issues of my vote. He first yanked single payer off the table and then by took away public option, after promising it in his second State of the Union (which BTW happens in January or February) .... a full year into his first term. I was angry, but I thought ... well, it's a complicated bill with a lot of moving parts. Let's see what happens.

But I was willing to give Obama a chance. I didn't decide against him until fairly far into his first term. It takes a long time to actually DO anything substantive, and not just speechify or tweet.

From the moment Trump was elected he faced an intransigent half of the population, but worse- an implacable deep state willing to "leak" lies and an compliant press willing to spray anything anywhere. Yes, Obama faced a lot of hostility, but it was not spread by the MSM.

So, I'm willing to wait and see what happens. I'm going to give Trump a chance, like I gave Obama a chance. My expectations are very low. As I have posted many times before, I voted for Trump for three things:

Reducing illegal immigration
Ending "free trade" deals
An end to our pointless hostility to Russia. I was hoping this would mean less "interventionism" abroad in general.

So far he's made progress on two of them and went way backwards on the third, but it's too early to speak of "failure", just as it would be too early to speak of "failure" for Obama.

I CAN talk about my concerns.

-----------

"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake

THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.








NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, April 24, 2017 11:01 PM

Quote:

Funny SIG. As I pointed out in an earlier thread. Being a Russian troll you would first argue why Trump should be president, and you did. Then, you would criticize him because, after all, he is president of the United States.
Funny THUGR, being a deep state troll, you first argue why Trump shouldn't be President (because you have no use for our democratic institutions) and then you argue why nobody should criticize any President. All while criticizing Trump.

-----------

"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake

THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, April 24, 2017 11:27 PM

You're funny...Deep State within a state is a political situation in a country when an internal organ ("deep state"), such as the armed forces and civilian authorities (intelligence agencies, police, administrative agencies and branches of governmental bureaucracy), does not respond to the civilian political leadership.

There can't possibly be an Obama deep state. He was elected by the civilian population, fool. The fact that these intuitions worked with presidents, Clinton, Bush, Obama, all presidents to date, proves your conspiratorial deep state doesn't exist in this country. Only Russian trolls and disgruntled losers think it does. Your lack of critical thinking skills is astounding.

Russia wants to upend Western democracy

http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=61343



Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Funny SIG. As I pointed out in an earlier thread. Being a Russian troll you would first argue why Trump should be president, and you did. Then, you would criticize him because, after all, he is president of the United States.
Funny THUGR, being a deep state troll, you first argue why Trump shouldn't be President (because you have no use for our democratic institutions) and then you argue why nobody should criticize any President. All while criticizing Trump.

-----------

"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake

THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.








NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, April 24, 2017 11:51 PM

Quote:

There can't possibly be a n Obama Trump deep state. He was elected by the civilian population, fool.- THUGR
Fixed it for you.

As a deep state troll, you would, of course, deny it's existence.

-----------

"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake

THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, April 25, 2017 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

There can't possibly be a n Obama Trump deep state. He was elected by the civilian population, fool.- THUGR
Fixed it for you.

As a deep state troll, you would, of course, deny it's existence.




Wow, I mean really, that's it? SIG's critical thinking skills at work folks. First of all stupid. I am not in a position where I can contribute to a deep state conspiracy. I mean, you do realize deep state means you work for the state don't you? After all, it's you pushing this whole deep state thing.

And to your friends here. When she claims that deep state is working with a president, she is unknowingly admitting deep state doesn't exist. By definition, deep state doesn't recognize the civilian chosen leadership.





NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

THG
Tuesday, February 19, 2019 2:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

There can't possibly be a n Obama Trump deep state. He was elected by the civilian population, fool.- THUGR
Fixed it for you.

As a deep state troll, you would, of course, deny it's existence.




Wow, I mean really, that's it? SIG's critical thinking skills at work folks. First of all stupid. I am not in a position where I can contribute to a deep state conspiracy. I mean, you do realize deep state means you work for the state don't you? After all, it's you pushing this whole deep state thing.

And to your friends here. When she claims that deep state is working with a president, she is unknowingly admitting deep state doesn't exist. By definition, deep state doesn't recognize the civilian chosen leadership.




Oh my...

T


NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

THG
Friday, August 23, 2019 8:25 PM

T

‘If You Want To Run This Country...Explain Whose Side You Are On’

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

THG
Friday, August 23, 2019 8:27 PM

T

Scaramucci Urges GOP To ‘Save The Country,’ Speak Out Against Trump




NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME