Countdown Clock to Trumps impeachment " STARTS"
POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Monday, April 14, 2025 23:28
VIEWED: 485499
PAGE 65 of 404
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
It looks like the blame for Mueller's future failure is already being written.
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-mueller-record-20171122-stor
y.html
As he investigates Trump's aides, Robert Mueller's record shows surprising flaws
Tick tock, tick tock
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The second hand goes round and round but the clock never advances. It looks a lot like spinning your wheels and going nowhere, fast.
HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO YOU BY NOW THAT IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO LOGICAL FALLACIES AND TROLLING YOUR SO-CALLED ARGUMENTS ARE LIES?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
The second hand goes round and round but the clock never advances. It looks a lot like spinning your wheels and going nowhere, fast.
Stupid is as stupid does. Are you really watching the GIF watch?
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Really, then why is it you don't understand that Trump is riding on the recovery coat tails of Obama. Just as Clinton's economic success rode in on the coat tails of what Bush started.
Why is it you don't understand, based on numbers, with a 4.1% unemployment rate and Goldman Sacks predicting 4% growth next year, that tax cuts will not stimulate jobs growth. The reason Republicans are pushing for them. That tax cuts at this time is not only not necessary, but not smart. Not tax cuts that favor the rich anyway.
Don't tell me you know what you're talking about. These proposed tax cuts are just a giveaway to the donor class.
T
Trump isn't riding anything. Quantitative easing damned your children and grandchildren, and Obama's addition to the deficit dwarfed GWB's insane additions. The employment rate never improved once under his administration when you include all the people who just stopped looking for work and all of the people who are working jobs today that make a fraction of what they used to.
I'm also not arguing that it's gotten any better since Trump is in office, and I've said as much several times. And I DO get pissed off whenever I hear anybody talking about it being good now too, whether they're talking about the economy or the job market. It's not.
As far as your question about Clinton and Bush, I'm going to assume you actually meant that GWB's administration prospered because of the Clinton administration (yeah, you messed that up too).
Though he had done better than our more recent presidents had, he opened up trade to China and his administration is the reason that we're so in debt to them now. A large part of his economic success was due to this fact. It was a means of temporary good times at the cost of a lot of the bad things we're dealing with today and compounding on with every administration since.
THIS is why it is important to think of the past. Quit using the bullshit cop out of "well we're here now". HOW DID WE GET HERE, DUMMY?
Show me the actual tax cuts so I can see what's in them. I don't want some bullshit biased story written by one of your MSM goons.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Really, then why is it you don't understand that Trump is riding on the recovery coat tails of Obama. Just as Clinton's economic success rode in on the coat tails of what Bush started.
Why is it you don't understand, based on numbers, with a 4.1% unemployment rate and Goldman Sacks predicting 4% growth next year, that tax cuts will not stimulate jobs growth. The reason Republicans are pushing for them. That tax cuts at this time is not only not necessary, but not smart. Not tax cuts that favor the rich anyway.
Don't tell me you know what you're talking about. These proposed tax cuts are just a giveaway to the donor class.
T
Trump isn't riding anything. Quantitative easing damned your children and grandchildren, and Obama's addition to the deficit dwarfed GWB's insane additions. The employment rate never improved once under his administration when you include all the people who just stopped looking for work and all of the people who are working jobs today that make a fraction of what they used to.
I'm also not arguing that it's gotten any better since Trump is in office, and I've said as much several times. And I DO get pissed off whenever I hear anybody talking about it being good now too, whether they're talking about the economy or the job market. It's not.
As far as your question about Clinton and Bush, I'm going to assume you actually meant that GWB's administration prospered because of the Clinton administration (yeah, you messed that up too).
Though he had done better than our more recent presidents had, he opened up trade to China and his administration is the reason that we're so in debt to them now. A large part of his economic success was due to this fact. It was a means of temporary good times at the cost of a lot of the bad things we're dealing with today and compounding on with every administration since.
THIS is why it is important to think of the past. Quit using the bullshit cop out of "well we're here now". HOW DID WE GET HERE, DUMMY?
Show me the actual tax cuts so I can see what's in them. I don't want some bullshit biased story written by one of your MSM goons.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
Nope, I mean Bush senior and Clinton. Bush raised taxes and still other factors began to stimulate the economy. Clinton benefited from that. That said, your gripe is due to your all or nothing attitude. Your dooms day persona.
There's so much wrong with Trump and what he's doing, only ignorance could blind a person to it.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
LOL at "my doomsday persona."
Who's the nutter who sees Nazis in every dark corner and is convinced we're going to be taken over by Russia?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
LOL at "my doomsday persona."
Who's the nutter who sees Nazis in every dark corner and is convinced we're going to be taken over by Russia?
I'll bite, who? Personally I never use the word nazis, and never refereed to anyone here as being one. Yes, I can't wait until Trump is gone, we get a patriot in office, and Russia gets it's due. As for them taking us over, well, that's just to funny.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I thought Nazis & Bolsheviks were enemies since WWII or before even.
(Hmmm ... does Bolsheviks = Communists? Maybe not. Gotta look it up.)
... oooOO}{OOooo ...
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Well Nazi and Communist ideologies do conflict deeply with each other, which makes it all the more comical that some people on these boards tend to use both insults for the same person. 
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
I'll bite, who? Personally I never use the word nazis, and never refereed to anyone here as being one. Yes, I can't wait until Trump is gone, we get a patriot in office, and Russia gets it's due. As for them taking us over, well, that's just to funny.
DID YOU, OR DID YOU NOT ADVOCATE THAT EVERYBODY HERE SHOULD HATE ME, SIGNY AND KIKI?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME