Keith Olbermann
POSTED BY: JO753
UPDATED: Friday, November 28, 2025 00:01
VIEWED: 13110
PAGE 3 of 9
Quote:
Good point. Of course polarization is part of the problem, what I come here to get away from.
Originally posted by G:
Figure: he was on msnbc. Their audience doesn't want to hear Obama hit jobs. Quote:
Sure, easily, but is it news? I think he had the potential, many of them do, not Wolf obviously, but you know, like Andersen Cooper, etc. Instead, Assange gets the position. I don't think the media as anyone to blame but themselves for that.
both parties could give you enough low hanging fruit to supply a dozen channels with hit-fortainment.Quote:
Debatable,
he's right on all of his observations in that video.
but generally yes, on the other hand, so is Jon Stewart, only he's funny.
Here are some quibbles
1) evil of another nation? He won an election because people voted for him.
Me, a typical Bernie voter, didn't vote for either. Dems need to lose the line "Russia stole the election" if that were possible, we would not be a nation.
Really, though? it's hogwash. Putin's threatening to attack US forces in the Gulf if Hillary was elected before she could command those forces was an act of desperation, not one of a person in control of the situation.
No, HRC was defeated by a very simple domestic force. Aside from Bernie supporters, black people did not vote for her as much as they would a normal dem. Her history of racism, sure, but srsly, he had a better platform for the voters in Detroit and Philly than she did, and that's where this election was really decided.
Intelligence briefings? that's odd. A lot of things that he wouldn't do that later he folder on. For what it's worth, I think Trump is smarter than Olbermann. It is still baffling. Clealy he's not getting along well with the CIA
Bush was a terrible president, but the intelligence briefings were wrong about the terror threat. That's not his fault. An inside job going on without his knowledge is. And that might happen to Trump.
The Russia rant? Please. Attacks Alaska, terror attacks, launches missiles? Russia hacks our systems and we hack theirs, and this has been going on since computers cam along. Remember COCOM? So, when Bush dubbed hackers "criminals" & Obama labelled them "terrorists," Putin was branding them "heroes" which is why he now has more hackers. But that's more of threat to the copyright industry than anyone else.
Trump will bring us slavery, word war, Putin is Hitler? Anyone remember when HRC said she would attack Russia during the campaign?
2nd video.
Trump crazy
okay, the middle videos were less on point.
the last video. he's better. he is mostly on target
I completely agree with him on the hillary voters
flynn was fired, or resigned, so that's actually in line with the speech
we all know donald didn't write that speech, and there were times when you could see him retraining himself.
he was right that the media loved the speech and he attacked them for it. He belongs on RWED!
but nazis ? come on.
Also, ivanka's dress is european? oh no! the dress this was a shameful moment in the media.
steel for keystone was already purchased. trump probably didn't know.
6,
He was awesome in 2005, when he was a serious newsman.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:
Jo
I have to concur with 1kiki. He's become a partisan hack. That said, it's Keith Olbermann, unless you want to go with kEX ObrmAn. Sorry, haven't quite worked out the cAps yet. Either way, you might want to edit the header.
He'z alwayz been solidly Democrat. There needz to be more guyz like him to balans out the hordez uv GoP propaganda spewerz.
Didnt know we can edit titlez. Thanks. I found out in the Skeptics Society forum that I'd missed the L. Onestly, I'd never notised it befor til then!
And I'd alwayz herd it az KEx OBRMIN!
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by G:
again, adults are watching.
Where were all the adults the last 8 years?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JO753:
He'z alwayz been solidly Democrat. There needz to be more guyz like him to balans out the hordez uv GoP propaganda spewerz.
Didnt know we can edit titlez. Thanks. I found out in the Skeptics Society forum that I'd missed the L. Onestly, I'd never notised it befor til then!
And I'd alwayz herd it az KEx OBRMIN!
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
Pretty sure the media is overbalances on the left, but not, of course, the real left, the kind of partisan democrat, which is barely a liberal.
KEx, okay, had been in the more standard issue model until sometime might have been before obama, but really noticeable w/obama, when he went after obama's opponents instead of staying hard on obama as he was hard on bush.
myself, i don't see a lot of difference between bush and obama, or either of them and clinton. I have no opinion yet on trump. I figure Bush Sr came in w/reagan, so the bush/clintons have been in power since 1980, and now someone else is, I guess after 36 years of that, or 28 years of internationalism, now we have national populism, i'll wait and see.
only thing i see that's happened politically so far is rex tillerson found $20 trillion in oil, in waters filled with russian ships, which probably explains everything that has happened since. the rest is stuff that basically every admin does. not a lot of change, except which side is complaining about it.
more interested in the real world events tho now. a lot happening lately: planets, aliens, AI, stuff i can use for the book i'm writing.
ETA:
G,
we've all known him for 40 years. Is there anything in the period from his Mr New York days to, say, his being lampooned in
http://www.zbrushcentral.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=173295
that would lead you to think he would actually check to see if someone had already bought the steel for Keystone XL before saying something about it?
The Ivanka's dress thing really annoyed me. She was wearing it to the Alfalfa Club, which is an elitist event like Bilderberg. I feel it's good to be represented at these, because the elites are going to do something whether the prez is there or not. I can see him not going because as a populist, billionaire or otherwise, he would be attacked for going. So, he sent Ivanka. To represent the US president at what ostensibly is a confederate men's club. The first woman ever to do so. And this is actually serious policy stuff. They can disagree with her, but they were actually just dissing her for being a girl. It was very feminist of our mediaQuote:
Originally posted by 6STRINGJOKER:Quote:
Originally posted by G:
again, adults are watching.
Where were all the adults the last 8 years?
6,
there are no adults
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:
They can disagree with her, but they were actually just dissing her for being a girl. It was very feminist of our media
That's our SJW MSM, in a nutshell. If that was Michelle Obama you wouldn't have heard nothing but how great she was the next couple of weeks for being there, but because anything "Trump" doesn't fit in with their agenda they turn into the misogynists they supposedly hate and treat it as a runway event and talk about her dress.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by G:Quote:
Originally posted by 6STRINGJOKER:Quote:
Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:
They can disagree with her, but they were actually just dissing her for being a girl. It was very feminist of our media
That's our SJW MSM, in a nutshell. If that was Michelle Obama you wouldn't have heard nothing but how great she was the next couple of weeks for being there, but because anything "Trump" doesn't fit in with their agenda they turn into the misogynists they supposedly hate and treat it as a runway event and talk about her dress.
SJW MSM RKO IBM AAA - boxes inside boxes. Your biases be showin'.
No, they wouldn't have said that about Michelle because she was not the daughter of the person who became president on the "Hire American, Buy American!" slogan. Remember that slogan?
Who are the SJW? School teachers, university professors, media, religious faiths,
So far it appears educated has a lot to do with being a SJW. Think of any more G?
---------------------
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by G:
SJW MSM RKO IBM AAA - boxes inside boxes. Your biases be showin'.
No, they wouldn't have said that about Michelle because she was not the daughter of the person who became president on the "Hire American, Buy American!" slogan. Remember that slogan?
That's cute.
Deny the fact that this actually was a big deal for women but rather than talk about that at all the SJW MSM decided it was worth sacrificing when trying to take down Trump. Can't have anything related to Trump being seen as progressive for women.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
So far it appearseducatedindoctrinated has a lot to do with being a SJW.
Fixed it for ya.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
What the hell are you even talking about?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6STRINGJOKER:Quote:
Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:
They can disagree with her, but they were actually just dissing her for being a girl. It was very feminist of our media
That's our SJW MSM, in a nutshell. If that was Michelle Obama you wouldn't have heard nothing but how great she was the next couple of weeks for being there, but because anything "Trump" doesn't fit in with their agenda they turn into the misogynists they supposedly hate and treat it as a runway event and talk about her dress.
Def. The dems threw a spaz attack when Trump announced that his daughter would be attending principles and international meetings, and not recognizing the fact that they just ran the ex-president's wife as a candidate.
There's a long history of when we elect a family when we elect an official, which is why there are laws for it. It makes sense for MSM to be sexist when it serves their purposes, because they don't care about anything except getting a neoliberal into office. It's easier to get people to hate Donald, than to hate Ivanka.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME