TRUMP - Just because.....................Naw, I just can't say it!
POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Monday, March 9, 2026 20:06
VIEWED: 244478
PAGE 14 of 170
Below is a thread started by 1kiki. Yet NOW she is down playing the bad about Trump and viciously attacking Hillary Clinton about global a organization that attempts to help impoverished countries. Also I am including a quote from her about ghettos. Now keep in mind the people in those ghettos are voting for Clinton not Trump.
capitalism, by definition, is a stupid and foolish human system
POSTED BY: 1KIKI
UPDATED: Sunday, November 29, 2015 08:26
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 9714
PAGE 4 of 6
Now, let's take a look at YOUR system for its inconsistencies. Did you ever walk through a ghetto? The most memorable times I've walked through one (the same one) were summer and winter. Now in summer there were many many young black males loitering around with nothing to do. In winter the driving snow was blowing in through the broken windows and the curtains were flapping in the wind. The building privided no protection from the weather. So here we have an obvious need to fill, and the labor to do it. Your theory says capitalism will rise to fill the need. Why didn't it?
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=58208&p=4
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
and viciously attacking Hillary Clinton about global a organization that attempts to help impoverished countries
First of all, what organization is that? Because without that information, you look like the corner soapbox orator, shouting into the wind and pointing at the sky.
--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Great, now you're spamming the board, posting the same post in multiple threads. So here is my answer to that, which I posted in the other thread
HE WEIGHS THE ODDS.
So unlike Hillary, who is so mesmerized by her neocon vision of the world that she will bounce in her seat a little, clap her hands, and laugh as she initiates WWIII (Yanno, kind of like she did when she unleashed Armageddon on Libya) Trump will take a much more realistic view of who might actually win, and how much damage he - and the USA- would sustain.
In addition to being somewhat manic (IMHO) Trump is a bully. But like all playground bullies, Trump has a pretty fine ear for anyone who might come along who is stronger than he is. At that point, he will negotiate. Trump is 50/50.
Hillary, OTOH, is a proven loser. She reliably initiates international confrontations that she can't possibly bring to successful conclusion.
You’re such an ASS. Below are just a couple of headlines that cover what Trump says he would do if commander in chief. And you suggest it is Hillary who would start world war three. When you want something as proven here, you will post made up nonsense. You even started a thread where your first post is to declare Clinton to be the war monger. What a joke you are. Trump is running on a populist strategy. It is very dangerous, you should educate yourself about it.
Military analysts: Donald Trump's plan to bomb Iraq's oil fields not a good one
Donald Trump Promises To Force Our Military To Commit War Crimes
Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and the folly of carpet bombing
Donald Trump: ban all Muslims
Carpet bombing SIG, kill everyone in an entire city. What a fuck up you are.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
and viciously attacking Hillary Clinton about global a organization that attempts to help impoverished countries
First of all, what organization is that? Because without that information, you look like the corner soapbox orator, shouting into the wind and pointing at the sky.
--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.
Quote you SIG
Shall I discuss what Hillary has done recently?
The Clinton Foundation, and how - during her tenure as Scy of State - the Foundation accepted tens of millions of dollars from donors who then asked for special favors from Hillary
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I happen to agree. Obama has NOT done a bang-up job on eliminating terrorism. He prefers to send arms to terrorists in Syria via the apocryphal and un-findable "FSA".
“We’re led by a man that either is, is not tough, not smart, or he’s got something else in mind. And the something else in mind, you know, people can’t believe it. People cannot — they cannot believe that President Obama is acting the ways he acts and can’t even mention the words radical Islamic terrorism. There’s something going on. It’s inconceivable.”
Quote:Trump is talking about "thousands" or radicalized Muslims, not the "millions" who are already here. And he isn't asking for people to turn in Muslims because they're Muslim, but to turn in people who are planning terrorist attacks. Isn't it like turning in a criminal? I mean, if you know your son is jacking up cars and might move on to murder, maybe you should say something?
“The problem is we have thousands of people right now in our country. You have people that were born in this country” who are susceptible to becoming “radicalized,” the billionaire real estate mogul told Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends. He claimed that there are Muslims living here who “know who they are” and said it was time to “turn them in.”
--------------
I'll tell you what I DON'T like about Trump: I think that he has never confronted either the international banking cartel, nor the CIA-State Dept multi-headed hydra, nor the military-industrial complex. The last person to confront them was JFK (BTW, ALL immigration was illegal under JFK) and look what happened to him.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Oh,the CLINTON FOUNDATION!
As far as I can tell, most foundations are just charitable covers for further investment development (Gates Foundation) or political control of foreign nations (National Endowment for Democracy). Almost none of the foundations/ NGOs that I can point to are politically or monetarily disinterested entities who just really want to help.
--------------
I'll tell you what I DON'T like about Trump: I think that he has never confronted either the international banking cartel, nor the CIA-State Dept multi-headed hydra, nor the military-industrial complex. The last person to confront them was JFK (BTW, ALL immigration was illegal under JFK) and look what happened to him.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Not exactly. There was Operation Peter Pan (or Pedro Pan, whichever you prefer) during the Eisenhower and Kennedy Administrations. Cubans came to the USA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Peter_Pan
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
The last person to confront them was JFK (BTW, ALL immigration was illegal under JFK) and look what happened to him.
About 14,000 unaccompanied minors arrived in the United States in 1960 and 1961 alone through a clandestine U.S. program code-named "Operation Pedro Pan.”
http://immigrationtounitedstates.org/453-cuban-immigrants.html
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Oh,the CLINTON FOUNDATION!
As far as I can tell, most foundations are just charitable covers for further investment development (Gates Foundation) or political control of foreign nations (National Endowment for Democracy). Almost none of the foundations/ NGOs that I can point to are politically or monetarily disinterested entities who just really want to help.
Your opinion as stated by you is that most charitable foundations are covers for investment and development which is Capitalism used in impoverished areas of the world to help move them out of poverty. That very concept is admirable. Yet without prof you claim foul against the Clinton foundation which does this, because it suits your purpose and helps you to promote Trump the Capitalist. A contradiction don't you think? Promoting the man who uses capitalism for nothing more than personal gain, and chastising those who use it help out those in need.
What you're really doing, is starting your attacks now against who you know will be the next president. Why, because she is going to be much tougher on Putin. Hell, she already is.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Not exactly. There was Operation Peter Pan (or Pedro Pan, whichever you prefer) during the Eisenhower and Kennedy Administrations. Cubans came to the USA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Peter_Pan
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
The last person to confront them was JFK (BTW, ALL immigration was illegal under JFK) and look what happened to him.
About 14,000 unaccompanied minors arrived in the United States in 1960 and 1961 alone through a clandestine U.S. program code-named "Operation Pedro Pan.”
http://immigrationtounitedstates.org/453-cuban-immigrants.html
That's just SIG making up her own set of facts again.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Science confirms: Online trolls are horrible people (also, sadists!)
New research out of Canada finds trolls are sadistic. Who knew?
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME