Hillary Clinton: just because she deserves her own thread
POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Saturday, September 27, 2025 01:07
VIEWED: 114591
PAGE 1 of 46
I always wondered why Hillary gave me a big case of the willies every time she tried to be charming. Now I know why:
HILLARY CLINTON, WARMONGER
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
My god SIG. Is there anything about you that isn't doom and gloom? Is there anything about you that isn't hypocritical? voicing outrage about the behavior of Hillary Clinton while praising people like Putin and his Iranian allies.
Is there any part of you that isn't a warped and sick bitch? I am about finished with my BSW and I currently work in the mental health field. Trust me, you are one sick bitch.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Troll, much?
Of course you do.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Troll, much?
Of course you do.
An Internet troll is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory remarks in online discussion forums or chat rooms with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response.
It is always you and SIG that start these inflammatory threads and since day one I have called you on it, comrade troll.
I really think it is time for the rest of us to talk past you as if you are not even posting.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
troll
One who purposely and deliberately (that purpose usually being self-amusement) starts an argument in a manner which attacks others on a forum without in any way listening to the arguments proposed by his or her peers. He will spark such an argument via the use of ad hominem attacks (i.e. 'you're nothing but a fanboy' is a popular phrase) with no substance or relevence to back them up as well as straw man arguments, which he uses to simply avoid addressing the essence of the issue.
Troll, much?
Of course you do.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Really!?
News Flash Everyone!
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I always wondered why Hillary gave me a big case of the willies every time she tried to be charming. Now I know why:
HILLARY CLINTON, WARMONGER
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It's pretty obvious SHINYGOODGUY. SIG's first post on her newly created thread matches what I said a troll is as well as 1kiki's definition. I had to laugh as I read 1kiki describing both herself and SIG in her definition of a troll.
Thread after thread is created by these two designed to draw the ire of others. It is what they do, what they live for. Much the same as JAYNESTOWN. Below is a decryption of trolls that if you think about it, fits much of what we have labeled these two over and over again. Liars and exaggerators who twist the truth. When they get caught it doesn't even slow them down. They just start another thread like this one. That is what trolls do. ""Both trolls and sadists feel sadistic glee at the distress of others."
Internet Trolls Are Narcissists, Psychopaths, and Sadists
" Trolls will lie, exaggerate, and offend to get a response."
SIG and 1kiki take topic after topic and post as though it is near and dear to them. They claim to be American yet take every opportunity to praise Putin, Iran and anyone they perceive will upset their American and Western allied audience. Think about it, TROLLS.
What I don't understand is why anyone here responds to them as though what they post deserves an answer. I respond by shinning a light onto them that exposes' them for who and what they are. I don't respond to their points of view because thier posted view is designed to stir up emotions and start controversy. Posting back to them in any other way feeds into what they desire. I am to smart for that. If others here believe as I do, they are trolls, why would you treat them as though they are not? Some of us here call them out for who they are. Others continue to be victims of their sadism. The best way to deal with a troll is to humiliate them. One way is to respond to their posts as silly nonsense ( not to be taken seriously ) and the other is to ignore them.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/intern
et-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There are other troubling aspects of Hillary's (and Bill's) reigns.
Victoria "fuck the EU" Nuland, who was recorded hand-picking the next government of Ukraine ("Yats is our guy"), worked for Hillary.
The shipment of 78 planeloads of weapons from Qatar and Saudi Arabia thru Turkey to jihadists in Libya? On Hillary's watch.
The transshipment of those same weapons from Benghazi to Syria by the CIA, with Ambassador Stevens' involvement? ALSO in Hillary's watch. (And don't forget- ambassadors work for the State Department).
There was a reason why Hillary wanted a private email server, and it wasn't to exchange recipes!
Those multi-hundred thousand speaking engagements to Wall Street? Yep, Hillary.
And those campaign contributions!
Emily's List $939,881 (identity-voters, rumored to have been started by Soros)
Citigroup Inc $883,547 (international bank)
DLA Piper $847,930 (international law firm for corporations and banks)
Goldman Sachs $821,031 (I think we all know who this is)
JPMorgan Chase & Co $771,111 (same here)
Morgan Stanley $754,538 (ditto)
University of California $608,858
Time Warner $591,524
Skadden, Arps et al $522,688 (international law firm for corporations, banks and financials)
Corning Inc $492,750 maker of specialty glass, including weapons-sighting systems
Kirkland & Ellis $443,420 (yet another intl law firm this one for corporate tax, intellectual property etc)
Paul, Weiss et al $427,062 intl corporate law firm with offices in China and elsewhere
Greenberg Traurig LLP $411,640 yet another intl law firm, from Mexico City to Seoul to Berlin
Sullivan & Cromwell $396,625 yet another intl law firm, corporate and ultrawealthy individuals
Akin, Gump et al $393,531 yet another intl law firm, IP, trade, labor, energy etc
National Amusements Inc $366,640 of which Viacom and CBS are subsidiaries
21st Century Fox $363,899 like above
Lehman Brothers $362,853 we all know who this is
Ernst & Young $360,127 intl audit firm
Harvard University $359,451 we all know who this is
https://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cid=N00000019&
cycle=Career
A lot of people seem to think that because "she's a woman" or because "she's a Democrat" or because "she's the Party's choice" that she's going to be a safe candidate who will work for our interests.
HA!
And that glowing smile about killing Qaddafi. WTF??????
--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I'm kind of hoping for a robust defense of Hillary. But meanwhile ...
Quote:
Hillary Clinton has excoriated Donald Trump for failing to stop a supporter from roughing up a protester during a speech, saying “This kind of behavior is repugnant. We set the tone for our campaigns — we should encourage respect, not violence.” Yet, in 2011, she did nothing to stop security personnel from brutalizing a 71-year-old veteran who stood silently with his back to her during a speech.
The protester, Ray McGovern, a retired Army officer and CIA analyst, was wearing a black “Veterans for Peace” T-shirt, when he was set upon within sight of Secretary of State Clinton, who ironically was delivering a speech about the importance of foreign leaders respecting dissent. The assault on McGovern left him bruised and bloodied but it didn’t cause Clinton to pause as she coolly continued on, not missing a beat.
--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME