Russia's and Assad's War Crimes in Syria
POSTED BY: kpo
UPDATED: Monday, September 8, 2025 15:48
VIEWED: 105502
PAGE 33 of 87
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
So, when Signy quotes a 'source' you approve it suddenly becomes suspect? Are you all THAT scrambled?
Sorry 1kiki but this is what KPO actually said,"Lolol, literally the next line after scoffing at Syrian activists' reporting of Russian war crimes, you cite Syrian activists' reporting as evidence of US war crimes. This is the exact same hypocrisy I pointed out just a few posts earlier, and you're at it again... "
Do you really think people are that stupid? Of course you do because if you didn't you would know what you post is seen as bull and biased. Ask an adult to explain it to you.
____________________________________________
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So, you have to derail the conversation off of Signy's post because you DO trust the 'source' and you can't afford to admit that it's telling the truth when it says 'our side' killed civilians?
Yanno, this: U.S.-Led Coalition Airstrike in Syria Killed Civilians, Opposition Says
An airstrike by the U.S.-led coalition killed about 25 civilians late Thursday in an Islamic State-held town in northern Syria, Syrian opposition and activist monitoring groups said.
And also, since you're not disputing that krappostooge's random photo with random words doesn't constitute evidence, you, too, think it's a 'fail'?
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:So, do you now believe that source because you previously believed it and cited it endlessly.
In the meantime, it looks like US airstrikes are back on after the Turkish attempted coup as
U.S.-Led Coalition Airstrike in Syria Killed Civilians, Opposition Says
An airstrike by the U.S.-led coalition killed about 25 civilians late Thursday in an Islamic State-held town in northern Syria, Syrian opposition and activist monitoring groups said.
Lolol, literally the next line after scoffing at Syrian activists' reporting of Russian war crimes, you cite Syrian activists' reporting as evidence of US war crimes. This is the exact same hypocrisy I pointed out just a few posts earlier, and you're at it again...
Or do you disbelieve that source because it's saying something you don't want to hear?
Or will you just plug your ears with your fingers saying "la la la I can't hear you" because you don't want to have to even THINK about who to believe?
Such a conundrum!
Quote:Says you. And I hope you'll forgive me, but I trust YOUR information even less than that Syrian terrorist sympathizer in London who is pretending to be a human rights organization.
Say, did you know that the USA constructed an illegal airbase in SE Syria, which the Russians bombed?- SIGNY
An airbase being used to fight ISIS- KRAPO
*************************************************
*************************************************
Apparently you can't keep from spewing TRUMP all over every thread. And you're not even American!
--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
So, you have to derail the conversation off of Signy's post because you DO trust the 'source' and you can't afford to admit that it's telling the truth when it says 'our side' killed civilians?
Yanno, this: U.S.-Led Coalition Airstrike in Syria Killed Civilians, Opposition Says
An airstrike by the U.S.-led coalition killed about 25 civilians late Thursday in an Islamic State-held town in northern Syria, Syrian opposition and activist monitoring groups said.
And also, since you're not disputing that krappostooge's random photo with random words doesn't constitute evidence, you, too, think it's a 'fail'?
Once again stupid. KPO was pointing out that the same group that SIG quotes when it supports her agenda she suggests is biased when it doesn't.
OK, got it this time
____________________________________________
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:No, I'm just quoting sources when it's inconvenient for YOU!
Once again stupid. KPO was pointing out that the same group that SIG quotes when it supports her agenda she suggests is biased when it doesn't.
--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:No, I'm just quoting sources when it's inconvenient for YOU!
Once again stupid. KPO was pointing out that the same group that SIG quotes when it supports her agenda she suggests is biased when it doesn't.
No, you are quoting news when it fits your agenda. I read it to find out who is doing what. You read it and cherry pick parts that again, FIT INTO YOUR AGENDA. Then I may chose to post the parts you avoid.
You saying otherwise is laughable.
____________________________________________
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
So, do you now believe that source because you previously believed it and cited it endlessly.
Or do you disbelieve that source because it's saying something you don't want to hear?
Or will you just plug your ears with your fingers saying "la la la I can't hear you" because you don't want to have to even THINK about who to believe?
Err, you're accusing me of hypocrisy (and putting words in my mouth to do it) - when it is your hypocrisy that is apparent for all to see. This is Donald Trump levels of projection!
I never said that I refuse to believe specific Syrian activist/monitoring groups' reports (as you do). And I never said that I trust and rely on them 100%. They are just one of the many sources that I have cited in this thread with regard to Russian war crimes - along with the UN, international charities/NGOs, respected mainstream journalists etc. "Citizen journalism" has to be treated with healthy skepticism, but when so much of their reporting is corroborated by these other neutral and respected sources then that gives them some credibility. As does examples of balanced reporting (a new concept for you, I know) - reporting of US/coalition civilian deaths, and not just Assad/Russian ones.
This is hard for you to hear, so I'm guessing you'll just ignore it, but... Your propaganda tells you that Russia/Assad critics (like me) and Western mainstream media rely completely on Syrian activists' reporting for their understanding of the situation inside Syria. If you opened your eyes and ignored the propaganda for a second you would see for yourself that this is not true. See how this very thread contains numerous examples of evidence of Russian war crimes from credible and authoritative and neutral sources. The UN, the Red Cross, MSF etc. I have pointed these sources out to you and kiki before, and it always sends you running from the thread, back to your propaganda. Then you come back a short time later scoffing about "activists and monitoring groups", calling them terrorist sympathisers. And then without any apparent irony or shame, you cite them as evidence of US/coalition civilian casualties...
Quote:
Apparently you can't keep from spewing TRUMP all over every thread. And you're not even American!
It's a signature, dumbass.
*************************************************
*************************************************
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
So, when Signy quotes a 'source' you approve it suddenly becomes suspect? Are you all THAT scrambled?
I love this classic and characteristic whataboutism. I point out yours and Siggy's hypocrisy and you both try to turn it around on me, putting words in my mouth.
Quote:
And random photos with random words typed on them are credible evidence?
Are you talking about my signature? That's hilarious.
*************************************************
*************************************************
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Are you talking about my signature? That's hilarious.
Yes, your signature of a random photo with random words IS hilarious!
Are you letting us know that that's what's in your brain, that you pretend is thought? That makes YOU hilarious, too!
THANKS FOR THE LAUGH, then. I'll be laughing at you every time you post your signature!
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Statement by the International Red Cross today - another hospital taken out, 6+ killed - https://www.rescue.org/press-release/irc-supported-hospital-syria-hit-
airstrike-killing-six
Quote:
"We are dismayed and in mourning today at well-founded reports of the loss of life of colleagues and civilians killed by an airstrike serving the needs of desperate people in a hospital in Dara'a, Southern Syria. We are also angry: year upon year we have warned and mourned about civilian loss of life in Syria, and yet the situation goes from bad to worse.
These reports are a horrific reminder that civilians and aid workers are not just on the frontline of the Syrian civil war. They are bearing an intolerable price. The bombing of hospitals is never justified. All those involved must be held to account.
It is right to have global attention on Aleppo, but it would be tragic if people came to believe Aleppo is the only crime scene in Syria. Across the country, aid workers and civilians are being targeted in a merciless way on a daily basis.
It doesn't even make the news anymore, but Assad and Putin's butchery goes on, day after day.
*************************************************
*************************************************
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME