Traitor Bergdahl released
POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 05:28
VIEWED: 18284
PAGE 13 of 18
Now teaparty American Leon Panetta has decided to " swift boat " the Bergdahl trade.
What next ?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Wow, The Troll speaks??? Thanks, JONGSSIE, for that example of sheer trollishness! Why don't you start posting pictures of fat women again, since you apparently have NOTHING of interest to say,
I've already posted a few times on the thread subject earlier this week. Of course you don't know that because you're a big fat lazy slob and an arrogant bitch like Niki. You don't need to read anyone's previous posts before shooting your big stupid mouth off. That makes YOU the troll here.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Apparently not. The man just can't keep from finding new ways to fuck everything up!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
GATTICA!!!!!!!!
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
G - do you deny that Panetta & Feinstein , among OTHER DEMOCRATS , are very ( not mildly ) critical of Obama's policy?
Y or N
Also, props to ANY elected official who deleted " welcome home " tweets, after learning the particulars about Bergdahl & his true actions.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:
Wahhhhh, I'm so in turmoil that my President & leadership suck! That never happened when Republicans ruled the world.
You seem to get more and more wise as you continue to learn from your betters.
It's almost funny how the delusional left think that backstabbing the military is fine and non-political, and anybody who objects is "swiftboating it" by making it political.
Also, we should look at it from Obama's perspective, which was lost from the start of this thread.
It's not about the traitor.
Obama needs a reason to release his fellow Muslim buddies. He must find a reason. They all agree with him that we must backstab the jews. They all agree Israel must be wiped from existence (and Barry is doing all he can to help). They all agree that their primary enemy is honest, law-abiding American Patriots (such as Tea Partiers). So what excuse can he use to release them to create more terrorist havoc?
Maybe he can negotiate to insert Palestinian terrorists into Israel government. Nope, won't work.
Maybe he can trade for the skulls of honest law-abiding American patriots (since they are beheaded, it's OK). Nope, Islamic leaders don't want to admit they really do have the skulls tucked in their closet, right under the Rose Law Firm billing records.
Hey! There is a fellow Muslim traitor who is residing in Afghanistan/Iraq/Pakistan/wherever that we can call a hero for getting his military unit attacked with casualties, and have his dad claim the White House conquered for Islam! Great idea, chief!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by G:Quote:
Originally posted by BIGDAMNNOBODY:Quote:
Originally posted by G:
I am a devoted and highly trained delusional - it's how I cope with all the knuckleheads who think these tiny stories are where we should focus our efforts.
And where, in your opinion, should we be focusing our efforts?
Perhaps on eradicating the scourge of genetically engineered humans riding around in self driving cars?
If it means hotter, faster, safer pizza delivery then I'm with Google. :)
Little things like The Economy, Jobs, Energy, Infrastructure, China, Russia, The World Cup (that's a personal one). Oh yeah, almost forgot: Real Affordable Health Care... something that effects just everyone.
I do agree with you and JSF about his point #8, that's a very real possibility. I would be more interested now - if I were Taliban - in kidnapping GIs as opposed to shooting them since it seems better in the long run.
The thing is is... and this is where so many of these !#@$! Obama rants break down and why I find them so g*ddamn stupid.... is what would any of you do if you were president and presented with this problem? GI capture by Taliban. It's pretty much a can't win situation, especially being hated so completely like O. is. But I'm all ears (heh), what would any of you have done? The Code is never leave a man behind.
We realize the talking points you got from the White House (or their stenographer pool at NYT) say to warp this "code" but it does not refer to traitors. You can retrieve the body of your executed traitor, but doing everything you can to bring back your "Man" refers to fellow soldiers/sailors/airmen/Marines or their bodies if fallen. If another Aldrich Ames, or Robert Hansen runs off to Moscow, you don't see us running to save them from themselves (oh, wait - I guess now Obama will, to excuse the release of more of his fellow Muslim terrorist buddies.
Quote:
So do you break that code and risk being even more hated by the military? "He says he can rot in a Taliban hole... what a piece of sh*t Obama is." If you play out all of his options he's screwed no matter what. And meanwhile we get lapped by the rest of the modern world while we piss and moan.
Pretty sure when we look back on the Obama years with any objectivity we'll see a lot of hate and stagnation, lots of nothing getting done, lots of missed opportunities. I thought we were smarter than that.
That is why Obama was elected. The electorate was informed this would be the result, and they voted for the Obamination anyway. Can't be surprised.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:Quote:
Originally posted by Niki2:
Just popped in here out of curiosity, read the first page of this thread. It's all I needed to see to remind me why I don't spend time here anymore. Absolutely amazes me how much time and energy supposedly intelligent people here will spend just FEEDING Rap, over and over and over for, what, now THREE pages?
Chris, I'm saddened you have so little in your life you will spend hours feeding the ego of someone who apparently gets his entire life's worth from nothing but poking people in the eye. It's weird; I had thought better of you for so long.
This place is just too damned sad.
Yeah CHRIS .... ya see, well, oh boy, you've done a horrible thing here in the sacred temple of RWED. Your ongoing battles with Auraptor have become so disturbing to NIKI that all she can do, after reminding everyone for the 100th time that she doesn't post a lot anymore or even bother to read threads, is just "pop in" to tell you she's "sad that you have so little in your life."
How dare you not live up to her high standards and expectations! What is wrong with you? You should thank your gods that you have someone like her, someone who unselfishly sacrifices her very special and valuable time just to set YOU straight. The ball is in your court now son. You can choose to repent your ways, or continue to carry on and upset her. Choose wisely.
For those of us who haven't the time or dedication to respond to her, Thanks for your time and effort.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I keep hearing him referred to as sergeant. But I've heard he was a Private when he deserted. He enlisted in 2008, and deserted in 2009.
So they promoted him during his time helping the enemy attack and kill our troups?
Why is nobody outraged at this?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by G:Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
G - do you deny that Panetta & Feinstein , among OTHER DEMOCRATS , are very ( not mildly ) critical of Obama's policy?
Y or N
Also, props to ANY elected official who deleted " welcome home " tweets, after learning the particulars about Bergdahl & his true actions.
Y or N?
How about Fuck Yeah, ya dull door knob, plenty of us are - when will you get that?
Don't those removed tweets make you think it's best to not believe any of them?
Well, answering 'fuck yeah' means you DO deny that Democrats are critical of Obama, when in fact, many are. So you failed that one.
Removed tweets are a minor issue. Some staffer playing around on twitter, trying to stay ' hip' and 'current' , or what ever. Do we think any politician actually is fully in charge of their twitter account, or are really typing our their very own 140 or less characters to the world ?
Please.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME