Real World Event Discussions

Iran Tried to Shoot Down American Drone

POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 11, 2026 03:04
VIEWED: 2675
PAGE 3 of 5

Friday, November 9, 2012 1:19 AM


Kwickie.

Still haven't changed those poopie pants, have ya.




" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, November 9, 2012 1:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Kwickie.

Still haven't changed those poopie pants, have ya.





Sorry - I thought you were old enough to change your own pants now.


Clearly you have nothing of substance to offer, other than the substance you've filled your drawers with, that is.



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, November 9, 2012 1:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Quote:

Originally posted by ANTHONYT:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:


I'm not sure how our snooping or their reaction to our snooping is new information or game-changing in any way. I doubt it was politically pertinent to the election.



And yet, the news of it was held until after the election.

Pretty curious handling of news that wasn't 'pertinent', huh ?



Hello,

It's true. The delay of unremarkable news is quite remarkable.

--Anthony





What did the President have for breakfast on Election Day?

Why is this information being withheld from us?!



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."



Hello,

It was Eggs Benedict.

As in... Benedict Arnold!

If only we'd known!

--Anthony



Note to Self:
Raptor - woman testifying about birth control is a slut (the term applies.)
Six - Wow, isn't Niki quite the CUNT? And, yes, I spell that in all caps....
Wulf - Niki is a stupid fucking bitch who should hurry up and die.

“The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget.” -Thomas Szasz

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, November 9, 2012 2:53 AM

fog of war
Iran / Iraq war
USS Stark
Exocet missile.
fog of war
airliner shot down... fog of war.

kwickie, I so obliterated your worthless ass in this thread, it's not even funny.

you're nothing but a punk, a troll, and a coward.

game, set , match.

* drops mic on the floor *


" out "


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, November 9, 2012 3:39 AM

I think posting flame bait is how little rapey copes. It makes him feel less insignificant.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, November 9, 2012 5:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
fog of war
Iran / Iraq war
USS Stark
Exocet missile.
fog of war
airliner shot down... fog of war.




So two isolated events, more than a year apart, fall under the "fog of war" heading.


But Iran isn't allowed to claim the same? After all, we're at war with so many of their neighbors at the moment, in one form or another, declared or not, human or drone. Can't they claim "fog of war" for shooting at our drone?

And wouldn't "fog of war" cover everything that happened in Libya and everywhere else?

Quote:


kwickie, I so obliterated your worthless ass in this thread, it's not even funny.

you're nothing but a punk, a troll, and a coward.




I can always tell when you've run out of steam and have nothing else to offer in a thread. That's when you fall back on your useless "I win, you lose, name-call, name-call, name-call" tactics. Say goodnight, Gracie.

Quote:


game, set , match.

* drops mic on the floor *


" out "




Gorsh, now he's a rap champion, too. I guess.


Settle down there, eight-mile. Check yourself, before you wreck yourself.




"I have no real clue of what you're speaking." - AuRaptor.

"Yes. I was wrong. I am sorry." - AuRaptor.

Note to self: Mr. Raptor believes that women who want to control their reproductive processes are sluts.

Reference thread: http://beta.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=51196

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, November 9, 2012 6:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
And speaking of how quickly people seem to forget, I remember a certain U.S. warship shooting down an Iranian airliner in international airspace, too.

I'm sure they had their reasons, though. Right?


Yes. The USS Vincennes was under attack by Iranian Gunboats at the time. The aircraft was misidentified as an Iranian F-14.

The fault for the incident lies to some extent on both sides and also random chance.

H

Hero...must be right on all of this. ALL of the rest of us are wrong. Chrisisall, 2012

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, November 9, 2012 6:57 AM

A helicopter at high altitude off the Vincennes took small-arms fire from (as they said) Iranian patrol boats. After pursuing the patrol boats into Omani waters and being warned away, eventually the Vincennes pursued the patrol boats into Iranian territorial waters when it opened fire on the civilian flight. The Vincennes was in pursuit and in Iranian waters, not under attack .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, November 9, 2012 12:38 PM

I'd like to thank Rappy and "Hero" both for making my case for me. According to their arguments, Iran is completely innocent of any wrongdoing in this matter, because if they thought this drone was a U.S. warplane and they misidentified it, then the whole incident just comes down to "the fog of war" and no harm was done. After all, with all the threats against them, and all the violence and fighting in nations all around them, it's easy to understand why they thought they were under attack.

Thank you both for clarifying this matter.

I have just one more question -


Why did you keep this "pertinent" information hidden away for so long?



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, November 9, 2012 10:22 PM

No 'case was made' . There was,in fact, an actual war going on , between Iraq and Iran, back in the 80's. When the USS Stark was hit by the Exocet missile , and when the Iranian jetliner was accidentally shot down.

Both incidents occurred in a theatre of war.

There was no 'war' going on, when the drone was shot at, in int'l waters. It wasn't shooting anyone, save for possibly by video.

According to the details, as they're known, Iran was completely and fully the aggressor here, and is fully at fault.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME