It's official, Iran attacked USA on 911
POSTED BY: piratenews
UPDATED: Monday, January 2, 2012 22:37
VIEWED: 4930
PAGE 1 of 3
U.S. DISTRICT COURT RULES IRAN BEHIND 9/11 ATTACKS, December 23, 2011
http://piratenews-tv.blogspot.com/2011/12/my-family-aided-911-terroris
ts-blame.html
Of course, Iran's attorneys were never allowed in the courtroom to present a defense. Because that's how we roll in The Great Satan.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Russia has also promised to go to war with us if we attack Iran.
The US has permanently spent its credibility with the world by attacking Iraq. Now they will always consider that if we have a conflict with an enemy that we are the evil aggressor. They will be right, of course.
That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by dreamtrove:
Russia has also promised to go to war with us if we attack Iran.
The US has permanently spent its credibility with the world by attacking Iraq. Now they will always consider that if we have a conflict with an enemy that we are the evil aggressor. They will be right, of course.
Yes. History has taught us that we should allow evil dictators and regimes to attack FIRST, and then respond.
" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I am pleased to see you are an astute student of history.
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Yes. History has taught us that we should allow evil dictators and regimes to attack FIRST, and then respond.
-----
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I *hate* IT WHEN THAT HAPPENS!
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Yes. History has taught us that we should allow evil dictators and regimes to attack FIRST, and then respond.
Every single time!
Wait. Japan had, like, planes & stuff...
Iraq had a few SCUDs...
Hey!!! WTF were we WORRIED about?????
The laughing Chrisisall
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Not only that, but thanks to our relentless "regimes changes" in the mideast, Syria only has to paint a popular movement as being aided and abetted by the USA (see Libya) in order to gain instant credibility and support.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:Quote:
Originally posted by dreamtrove:
Russia has also promised to go to war with us if we attack Iran.
The US has permanently spent its credibility with the world by attacking Iraq. Now they will always consider that if we have a conflict with an enemy that we are the evil aggressor. They will be right, of course.
Yes. History has taught us that we should allow evil dictators and regimes to attack FIRST, and then respond.
Actually what DT said is that regardless of who attack us or why, we are the evil aggressor.
So, according to DT, if Adolph Hitler's even more evil clone attacks us from the secret Nazi moonbase a thousand years from now with the goal of eating children and forcing everyone to worship Satan its because we are the evil aggressor (assuming we fight back, because if DT has his way we will immediately surrender).
H
"Hero. I have come to respect you." "I am forced to agree with Hero here."- Chrisisall, 2009.
"I agree with Hero." Niki2, 2011.NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by canttakesky:Quote:I am pleased to see you are an astute student of history.
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Yes. History has taught us that we should allow evil dictators and regimes to attack FIRST, and then respond.
I agree. I actually agree with Auraptor's analysis of the statement as well. Yes, if you do not attack first, your position is defensible. If you do not respond, your position gets better. Israel has made three attempts to attack Iran and they have not responded. Good for them.
War should not be gone into lightly, and not preemptively. Another term for preemptive defense would be "starting a war."
ETA: Sig, I think that the Syrian rebels *are* CIA/JSOC and friends. I think Assad is right, socialist though he may be
We actually have no business in Syria. We shouldn't be encouraging people to suicide against their govt. either. This war will probably happen, unlike Iran, because it's at least possible. The only thing delaying it is the US driving a wedge between Syria and Russia. That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Obama bombed Iran ONE DAY BEFORE this court opinion...Coincidence?
Al Qaeda Dictator Hussein Obama and the German Nazi Queen of England bomb Iranian oil depot for Christmas 2011 (wants $10/gal gas for jew banksters on Wall Street)
http://independentnewshub.com/?p=49466
http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2011/12/22/prison-planet-com-u-s-jets-ente
r-iranian-airspace-oil-depot-bombed/
WWIII Countdown: CFR declares “Time to Attack Iran”
http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/wwiii-countdown-cfr-declares-time-
to.html
Defrocked US Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich has called for a military strike against Iran's oil refineries, no comment on Newt's resignation for 85 ethics violations - Nov 28, 2011
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/212631.html
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
They don't need a giant owl to sacrifice children, they have the military.
Our brass has repeatedly said the footsoldier is obsolete, so why do they keep sending them in? Why did the brits order their men to marching into the German machine gunfire?
That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME