"Falling Skies" this Sunday on TNT
POSTED BY: NewOldBrownCoat
UPDATED: Thursday, June 30, 2011 06:25
VIEWED: 15999
PAGE 4 of 5
I kind of like it. My dad and I are sticking with it for now and its on when I'm with him so I actually have time to watch it. Sure its not super exciting yet but I'm enjoying it well enough (note that I'm pretty easy to entertain). The problem is going to be getting my dad to stick with it if more things don't explode, he has a very short attention span when it comes to shows, if there isn't enough action he usually gets bored and doesn't feel like watching anymore so hopefully it will keep his attention.
The drug addiction element of tonight's show was interesting, evidenced by the preview of next week's episode. As for going around in the daytime, I get the impression that the Skitters don't come out during the day most of the time, they prefer nighttime. I really like the idea that these aren't the real threat, that they're the worker bees so to speak, getting Earth ready for the big boys to come in. I know if I were the survivors (in an alternate world where I would actually _survive) I'd want to get as far from the city as possible and find space for starting a commune so we can grow crops etc. because canned goods won't be around forever.
"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by piratenews:
.....uninformed conspiracy drivel....
Please, could you keep the conspiracy theories away from a perfectly nice forum.
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?"
-Douglas Adams
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
In the show they said about 90 percent of humans died, so there are lots left. A decent chunk of world's-come-to-an-end stories kill off 90 percent of people, leaving plenty left to continue on but not enough to be "over populated" anymore, I put that in quotes because overpopulation is a relative term and it isn't my job or anyone else's to decide where the line is crossed. Anyways that's the one thing in PN's rant that made sense, the 90 percent of people dying thing.
"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by RionaEire:
In the show they said about 90 percent of humans died, so there are lots left. A decent chunk of world's-come-to-an-end stories kill off 90 percent of people, leaving plenty left to continue on but not enough to be "over populated" anymore, I put that in quotes because overpopulation is a relative term and it isn't my job or anyone else's to decide where the line is crossed. Anyways that's the one thing in PN's rant that made sense, the 90 percent of people dying thing.
Who said anything about making sense?
Quote:
"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal. Most of the people will have died and the rest of us will be cannibals. We're too many people; that's why we have global warming. Everybody in the world's got to pledge to themselves to one or two children. Communist China just wants to sell us shoes. They're not building landing craft to attack the United States, and Russia wants to be our friends, too. It's been a long time since anybody caught me saying something stupid."
-Ted Turner, bi-polar founder of CNN News who was paid $3-billion salary tax-free in one day and owns 1,910,000 acres (more land in USA than any other US citizen), father of 5 kids, member of the Bilderberg Secret Society Of Magnificent Robber Barons
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Bramkaandorp:
Please, could you keep the conspiracy theories away from a perfectly nice forum.
This is a thread on reviewing a science fiction series. That's exactly what I did, by re-engineering the warp psyop.
The difference between science fiction and science fact is like the difference between conspiracy theory and conspiracy science. If you can't tell the difference, you're in deep space without a paddle.
Besides, I think Megan Fox is frakkin hot, and I piss on Spielbug like his buddies at Bohemian Grove.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
In that case, I'd recommend that you give Skeptoid a listen. At least ten you can say that you have heard from both the conspiracy angle, as well as from the well-researched angle.
Cheers
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?"
-Douglas Adams
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Well I'm liking it. I've enjoyed the start of this a great deal more than I did V. I like that they're taking their time with it.
Nice production values, decent enough actors, plenty of characters that rub you up the wrong way and a little hint of something else going on with the Aliens.
I'm in.
Cartoons - http://cirqusartsandmusic.blogspot.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I hope Morena never reads this, but in my opinion comparing something favorably to V is not saying much.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hence the reason I said a great deal more than.
Cartoons - http://cirqusartsandmusic.blogspot.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Bramkaandorp:
In fact I'd love to see a series in which the humans don't survive. In other words, a tragedy.
I get you - but would you advertise that fact upfront? Watch our show - everyone dies!
People tune in for drama. Ya kinda loose that when you give away the end upfront.
Quote:
Would be a welcome change from the usual "Humans get trampled underfoot, humans find crucial weakness overseen by the technologically more advanced aliens, and win in the end because of it".
It may be a welcome change for some, but really, you're not likely to find much of an audience with such a show.
Quote:
Not to sound too pessimistic, but if aliens with a taste for colonisation suddenly appeared in the sky, I think they'd be far more likely to wipe all humans from the surface of the earth, than that a small group of humans would overthrow them.
I'm looking for some realism to go with my science fiction. Don't we all?
It may be more likely, but that doesn't mean that makes it entertaining to watch.
"Some" is the important part of that "some realism" part. There are many great stories that would be utterly ruined by too much realism.
"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME