Can there be 'good' laws?
POSTED BY: SignyM
UPDATED: Sunday, March 8, 2026 22:49
VIEWED: 1971
PAGE 3 of 3
Only laws that tell the gibmit to stop fukkin US in the a$$.
Gubmit should be required to read AND UNDERSTAND all laws before passing them.
All politicians and police should be required to obey all traffic laws at all times. Oh, there's already a law for that.
Note the Nazi fasci on either side of the podium:
Note the gold-fringed flag...
Quote:
USC TITLE 4 > CHAPTER 1
CHAPTER 1 - THE FLAG
Sec. 1. - Flag; stripes and stars on
The flag of the United States shall be thirteen horizontal stripes, alternate red and white; and the union of the flag shall be forty-eight stars, white in a blue field.
Flag - Martial law. “The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander In Chief of the Army and Navy.”
-34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 483.
Display of Military Flag
Flag - Martial Law “2-3. Sizes and Occasions for Display.
b. National flags listed below are for indoor display and for use in ceremonies and parades. For these purposes the United States flag will be rayon banner cloth, trimmed on three sides with golden yellow fringe, 2 1/2 inches wide. It will be the same size as the flags displayed or carried with it.
c. Authorization for indoor display
4. Each military courtroom. [The municipal Courts of the State Republic???] “1-6. Restrictions. The following limitations and prohibitions are applicable to flags, guidons, streamers, and components.
e. Unauthorized use of official flags, guidons, and streamers. Display or use of flags, guidons, and streamers or replicas thereof, including those presently or formerly carried by U.S. Army units, by other than the office, individual, or organization for which authorized, is prohibited except as indicated in (3) below.
(3) Recognized United States Army division associations...” United States Army Regulation AR 840-10, October 1, 1979.
Flag - Martial Law Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. chapter 1, §§ 1, 2, & 3; Executive Order 10834, August 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6865, a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE border on three sides. The President of the United States designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief.
www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/4/ch1.html
www.goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=7050
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Magonsdaughter,
I think this was not the debate that we were having: Two issues had been brought up if I understand correctly
1. Sig's proposal that laws could *increase* freedom.
2. Frem's idea that laws were not the best way of securing good behavior.
On the drinking and driving thing, 1. it doesn't increase freedom, and 2. the law isn't the best way. We have a very serious drunk driving problem here and pretty harsh laws against it. There are cops on all the major roads looking for them all the time.
And then we have bars that you can only get to by driving to them. We have a social order where the hook-up scene is at the bar (Okay, maybe drinking helps people be relaxed, but a bar doesn't as an institution) and then we have no alcohol sensors in cars, and definitely no moral value structures in place about drunk driving.
The traffic cops themselves seem to be doing nothing to decrease the death toll, which only rises, and they seem to be a menace on the road, because to escape the punishment, the drunk driver will sometimes try to outrun the cop, which almost always ends up in people getting killed, because no way can you control a car at 100mph while drunk.
Sorry, this is a very serious issue here, and this legal solution has to be put down in my book as "extremely not working." It's about as effective as the war on drugs.
That said, I see where you're coming from, I agree on the problem, not the solution. If it works in Australia, and you have any insights as to why that is so where you are, please share, cause it ain't working here (A lot of things don't work here... Oh, and if you read through the posts, you'll find not a lot of USA Yay! I think you'll find a lot of accusations of the US govt. as being a force for genocide, there was a thread on this very issue two days ago, it was probably about #1409 on the subject.)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
'The View' changes its opinions with more threats of Lawsuits or Chinese-Whisperers that went out of control?
a team of Lawyers now watch her acts, dismissed now as a pretender a crazy woman, a kranky cookie brain, charlatan, quack, swindler race baiter, racketeer or just one of those plain wacko leftwing marxist nutty types
The View host Sunny Hostin fumes as she is forced to read a legal note just minutes after presenting the Matt Gaetz allegations as a “fact.”
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1859055717602238895
somebody or some team is worried about defame legal term, some person at ABC legal is now watching her (very) closely.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Majority of US employers impacted by Trump’s DEI, immigration policies – study
https://www.globallegalpost.com/news/majority-of-us-employers-impacted
-by-trumps-dei-immigration-policies-study-1061493781
Trump rejects settling Iran war; raises prospect of killing all its potential leaders
https://japantoday.com/category/world/israel-iran-trade-more-blows-ira
nian-president-draws-criticism-at-home-for-apology#comments
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME