Real World Event Discussions

Taking a Gander at the Goose

POSTED BY: AnthonyT
UPDATED: Saturday, September 13, 2008 18:28
VIEWED: 6871
PAGE 6 of 8

Friday, September 12, 2008 1:49 PM

Quote:


You have yet to show that McCain was speaking directly about Hillary. That’s you’re problem. Palin’s Lipstick comment relates Obama’s lipstick comment to her, but you haven’t show that there is any relationship between what McCain said and Hillary. You simply assume that if McCain used the same hackneyed phrase as Obama that it must be meant the same way, but that is not the case. So if you want to show how the McCain comment is related to Hillary, then I’m listening, if not, you can’t show a relation.



Yes, and you have yet to relate Obama's comment directly to Palin. Other than the fact that both comments contain the word "lipstick", there is no similarity or relation between them. And you yourself have said that she doesn't own the word - so now you're saying that she DOES own it?

Were you for it before you were against it, or are you just lazily listening to the people who tell you exactly what you want to hear again?

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence[sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions

I can't help the sinking feeling that my country is now being run by people who read "1984" not as a cautionary tale, but rather as an instruction manual. - Michael Mock

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 12, 2008 2:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
It's ok when Republicans do it, there's two different set of rules, don't you get it?


Are you saying Hillery is a Pig?

H

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 12, 2008 2:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Were you for it before you were against it, or are you just lazily listening to the people who tell you exactly what you want to hear again?


I thought Obama's remark was innocent. I thought it was innocent when Republicans used it.

Many women, however, have been offended by what Obama said. Like it or not that is the issue, not what you or I think, not what Obama meant, not that Republicans used the same term in 2007, and not that Palin was not offended either...the issue is that women heard what she said at convention, then heard what Obama said, and interpreted it as a derrogatory statement.

He should apologize, not because he did something wrong, but because the women he needs to get himself elected expect him to apologize. Its a political issue.

H

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 12, 2008 4:16 PM



Excuse me Hero,

that totally glosses over the fact that the reason people are seeing an offense is because your GOP friends are lying about Obamas intentions with the use of the phrase in the first place.

Given that you are stand-up enough to say that yes, his comments were innocent, could you then make the next logical step and say that ads attributing Obama's words to Palin, endorsed by Mccain are unethical lies and that the Mccain campaign is engaging in smear? And that the logical conclusion to be drawn is that Mccain is not the stand-up, no nonsense, straight-talker, that he has been claiming to be all this time?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 12, 2008 4:27 PM

Thank you, Anthony!

So let me ask this, Hero:

If *I* get offended because McCain's campaign keeps talking about "change", when Obama's campaign has been all about change, does that make McCain's derogatory statements about "change" and Obama racist? Should McCain apologize to me if I'm offended, or should I get the fuck over it?

Odd that all those Republicans who kept referring to Palin as "hot" and "a babe" are SOOOOOO offended by a remark about lipstick that had nothing whatsoever to do with her.

Maybe Republicans are even more stupid than I've always suspected they were...



Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence[sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions

I can't help the sinking feeling that my country is now being run by people who read "1984" not as a cautionary tale, but rather as an instruction manual. - Michael Mock

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 12, 2008 7:18 PM


Just to update,

Mccain, our maverick truth telling bastion of honesty integrity, straight talk,

has said that neither of those ads he endorsed are lies, so he said on The View


NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 12, 2008 8:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Righteous9:
that totally glosses over the fact that the reason people are seeing an offense is because your GOP friends are lying about Obamas intentions with the use of the phrase in the first place.


Of course they are spinning the story. But the women I talked to indicated that the comment...the raw sound bite...was offensive. Obama's explanation was offensive. The GOP's take was a neglidgable factor to them except that it made the soundbite available to be heard (much like Obama's pastor...the GOP spin made the comment public, the outrage was entirely content based).

Folks know enough to disregard most of the spin.

And I cannot stress enough...they don't feel he was calling her a pig...they feel it was a weight/appearance insult and when they hear explanations they think...sure, it wasn't intended, but it was a slip about how he feels.

H

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 12, 2008 8:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:
Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
It's ok when Republicans do it, there's two different set of rules, don't you get it?


Are you saying Hillery is a Pig?

H




I would say yes...but that gives pigs a bad name...

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 12, 2008 8:46 PM

What? They are not spinning, they are lying...you know it, you even said you didn't think they believed that's what he meant by the comment. If they don't believe that's what he meant then when they release an ad that says it is, that isn't spin Hero, it's lying.

Do you need a link to the internet ad endorsed by Mccain that I'm referring to?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 12, 2008 9:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Righteous9:
What? They are not spinning, they are lying...

How come Democrats lie, but Republicans spin? I thought everyone that tells untruths is lying.....


Guess that's just me.

JustsayNOtotruthisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME