Real World Event Discussions

Faith and Reason

POSTED BY: misbehaven
UPDATED: Wednesday, October 4, 2006 04:36
VIEWED: 7253
PAGE 5 of 5

Wednesday, October 4, 2006 12:16 AM

Thank you for your honest and open answer Chronicthehedgehog, I appreciate it. I still find it odd to hear an atheist use the word religion. The definitions I get from Wordweb for religion are: 1. A strong belief in a supernatural power or powers that control human destiny. 2. An institution to express belief in a divine power. My Webster's Dictonary pretty much echoes that definition so please understand that this is what I think of when the word is used. I need to check out that dictonary.com.

Please know that not all of us "religious types" think that atheists are amoral nihilists. While I do understand your beliefs I can not comprehend them (sorry I couldn't help myself) and I do not think less of you for having them either. While we may not agree on the subject of God I do believe that "we are well met".

"Well, my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." http://whimsicalnbrainpan.blogspot.com/

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, October 4, 2006 4:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SevenPercent:

Darwin in later life was an atheist. T.H.Huxley was at best an agnostic, as were most of their contemporaries - they were not occult practitioners.



honostly that depends on what the truth of the matter is. i believe that mans fall from eden was a literal fall into a physical, mortal, linear dimension (in which we are subject to entities in different dimensions or frequencies); Jesus' ressurection and his return are supposed to symbolize our redemption to our prefall state (which was immortal and sinless), once again in relationship wtih the living God(like the rest of nature)

obviously thats just our belief.. but its different than the traditional model of evolution.. if its true, and GOd does exist, then a worldview which would deny these essential foundations would in essence be occultic; so Darwin indirectly was an occultist, whether he personally believed in it all or not.


Quote:

No offense, Antimason, but it is the height of ignorance to claim that the scientific theories put forth by those men are the result of some occult conspiracy. As someone above pointed out, the fact that the domain names just scream tinfoil-hat crackpots is an insult to both religion and science.


look if youve never heard of the NWO, youve got a lot of catching up to do. one of the Rothschilds once said

"I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire and I control the British money supply."

the central banks have been a prime proponant of this agenda, and coincidentally, the American central bank prints Masonic, Satanic symbolism on its money. the key here is symbolism, images which represent archetypes that go back to our earliest of origins; origins which you all deny, as if these elaborate, fantastic stories of superhuman interventions were fairytells. if we evolved over thousands of years, why is that not recorded? where did these personal stories of "god-like" entities come from? it sure makes the explosion of civilazation and knowledge more understandable
, since those "gods" did exist, and our ancestors spanning the globe recorded the same stories. notice that its the RULING elite heirarchy that still believe in these "gods" of antiquety.. what do they know that we dont?

bohemian grove, skull and bones.. you guys never give a better explanation as to why ex presidents and world leaders are actively envolved in occult secret societies like these.. its always just a bunch of crap to you. but its there, its documented.. if both Bush and Kerry were Skull and Bones members, shouldnt we know what this society is, whose initiates pledge eachother an allegience above all others?

Quote:

But hey, if you need to believe that lizard-alien hybrids (who hate Jesus) from beyond the stars have come to take over the government and steer our scientific discoveries, then hey - whatever helps you sleep at night.


let me draw you a parrallel. in Gen 6 it says that angels(or superhuman beings), left their domain(the heavens) and came unto the daughters of early man and had offspring with them; these offspring were hybrid beings known as the Nephilim. this influence was so corruptive to man that God sent a flood to wipe out this virus, essentially, and spared Noah and a few others because their seed was unblemished.

many other cultures, the Sumerians, the Greeks, and Mayans, the Celts etc describe in so many ways this same occurance of "gods" interacting with mankind and illuminating us with 'knowledge'. there are many marvels of the ancient world, the sphyinx, stone henge, along with tales of Atlantis and so on... that something HAD to have occurred to inspire these stories. to me, there is clearly another aspect to our existence besides the physical, and im willing to look to our ancestors for answeres. that is my belief, but it puts to good use the exposures of the occult societies and their activity, as it is all profoundly related

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME