Sarah Michelle Gellar Topless In Next Flick?
POSTED BY: zoid
UPDATED: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 02:01
VIEWED: 7320
PAGE 3 of 3
Tristan:
Oops. I wrote that whole thing and forgot to say, "Thank you. I appreciate your appreciation."
It's rude not to acknowledge a compliment. I may not deserve it, but... I apologize for my unintentional slip of manners.
Thanks again. It really means something to me. What good is loving others, if we treat their love like a poor gift, when it is freely given in return?
Respectfully,
zoid
_________________________________________________
"I aim to misbehave." -Capt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity, a.k.a. 'the BDBOF'
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
cozen replied, in part:
Quote:
An intriguing thread. Given it's authour, I'm not surprised...
Heh-heh. You know, when I started this thing, I really wanted to solicit the opinions of Buffy fans regarding SMG's latest declaration. I've heard so much glowing praise of Buffy -- and of SMG as her portrayer -- as a Feminist Movement heroine. The idea that SMG's seriously considering baring her breasts in order to shake the movie role tree is bound to have some repercussions on that image, n'est-ce pas?
Then I went and spoiled it all by getting "intriguing"...
...And you're right. There's entirely too much wardrobery going on in Hollywood. *affects Jayne voice* A movie without breasts is like... well, a movie without breasts, gorram it!
Also, I hope those Ontarian prudes will loosen up a little and improve your mall experience, very soon.
Boobily,
zoid
P.S.
Obviously, with the exception of the first paragraph, I'm just joshin' with you. Seriously though, I'd like to see nudity-as-a-commodity become unmarketable, because it will have become so commonplace and realistically portrayed in the movies that it no longer titillates (pun intended). Then men and women both could be free of it...
P.P.S.
Frankly, Meg could've left it out. They couldn't save the movie, and Mark was a bigger boob than both of hers.
_________________________________________________
"I aim to misbehave." -Capt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity, a.k.a. 'the BDBOF'
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by cozen:
Women can shop in any mall, clad only in sunglasses above their shorts... and wouldn't I be right there if'n they were into that relaxed level of shopping, eh?
It wouldn't be that relaxed a shopping experience if'n you an' a bunch of other guys were there to ogle, would it? ;)
Actually, it's an interesting question -- even if one were totally relaxed about their own body, they still might not want to be stared at by others, the vast majority of whom would be excited, embarassed, or disapproving. I like wearing shorts, but if there were a mall where everyone ogled my bare knees I think I'd avoid it. ;)
---
I don't need a gorram back-spaceship driver!!!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I agree, there's that egregious transitional phase, what with all the ogling. I would also admit to being one of the many egregious oglers. I thank me for not being perfect, on account of how I've only this one life, and only a finite amount of beauty within that life for me to experience.
Yep, I've never thought that womenfolk had it easy. However, I do think that Sarah Geller's got it easier than me, what with the extra millions in her bank accounts that I, for one, don't have. (See how hard I work at attempting to segue to the the topic?)
Moreena: you do it, girl, but only if it makes sense to the story, okay?
***
Fowl to froggy, the froggy to mammal,
the mammal to monkey, the monkey to man.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Zoid, no problem at all. I have come to the realization that when Browncoats speak to each other, the thanks is understood. 
______________________________________
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
