General Discussions

Everything is not what it seems, I've discovered a horrible truth

POSTED BY: agirlyman
UPDATED: Sunday, March 5, 2006 23:38
VIEWED: 19634
PAGE 7 of 9

Thursday, March 2, 2006 5:58 PM

Here's the way I see the goings-on of this thread:

1) G-Man posts an interesting, but vague ANALOGY.

2) Some of us didn't get it.

3) G-Man's response is perceived by some, including me, to be condescending and insulting.

4) Indignant responses to said perceived insult/condescension ensued, followed by escalating volleys of condescension, spelling & grammer checks, and insults from both sides.

5) Along the way, some decided to take G-Man's analogy literally, i.e. "Joss REALLY IS trying to control our minds!", instead of: "Ha ha! Joss must be trying to control our minds ha-ha!"

6) Then more BDIs from the More-Intelligent-Than-Thou crowd decided to chime in and fan the flames of condescension.

7) Thankfully, along the way, some haven't taken any of it seriously, and delivered gems like the "imbue" response...still makes me chuckle.

Once I finally got it, I found the analogy clever and interesting(with some holes), but didn't take it literally.

My biggest problem with this thread is the attitude of those mentioned in #6 above. Folks with this mentality give sci-fi fans a bad name, period.

I rest my case.




OPERATIVE: ...and I am unarmed.
MAL: Good.
(BLAM!)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, March 2, 2006 6:11 PM

Admittedly, those quotes do look rather condescending (when taken out of context). Some futher explanation. As to the theory itself, I could have taken it or left it... it was the smirking, impish "neener-neener you're lame because you don't get it" attitude that got to me more than anything else.

*************************************************
"We've done the impossible, and that makes us mighty."

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, March 2, 2006 6:20 PM

Jonestein enumerated some fine points, including:

Quote:

4) Indignant responses to said perceived insult/condescension ensued, followed by escalating volleys of condescension, spelling & grammer (sic ) checks, and insults from both sides.

and...

6) Then more BDIs from the More-Intelligent-Than-Thou crowd decided to chime in and fan the flames of condescension.


I was originally going to say, "agirlyman is not a girly-man." But since everything I say is a lie, I felt this statement might be misconstrued...



Antinomically,

zoid
_________________________________________________

"I aim to misbehave." -Capt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity, a.k.a. 'the BDBOF'

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, March 2, 2006 6:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by okcbrowncoat:
Admittedly, those quotes do look rather condescending (when taken out of context). Some futher explanation. As to the theory itself, I could have taken it or left it... it was the smirking, impish "neener-neener you're lame because you don't get it" attitude that got to me more than anything else.

*************************************************
"We've done the impossible, and that makes us mighty."



Actually, my condescension comments were aimed at the attitude you so poignantly described above, not your post. I just forgot to remove your comments from my post before I submitted it...sorry, didn't meant to quote you out of context.

Guess I'm just not an intelligent poster.






OPERATIVE: ...and I am unarmed.
MAL: Good.
(BLAM!)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, March 2, 2006 7:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by zoid:
Jonestein enumerated some fine points, including:
Quote:

4) Indignant responses to said perceived insult/condescension ensued, followed by escalating volleys of condescension, spelling & grammer (sic ) checks, and insults




Sheesh...I'm glad SOMEONE with intelligence got that one.

Neener-neener.

(there IS no typo...)



--------------------------------
OPERATIVE: ...and I am unarmed.
MAL: Good.
(BLAM!)
--------------------------------
FIGHT TO RE-LIGHT!!
www.fortworthbrowncoats.com
--------------------------------

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, March 2, 2006 7:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by agirlyman:

It's very entertaining to watch you "Robotmonkeys" spring into action, and make a whole post attacking my sentence structure, and grammer,




Not to mention your spelling of "grammar". :)

But all kidding aside, I think a lot of us "got" it alright, but probably dismissed it right out of hand, thus "losing" it again, because it was simply too, well, broken. Joss made a great show that affected us all. So, being affected makes us River? Or because it was a life-altering experience? So is a Reaver raping me to death, eating my flesh and sowing my skin into his own. But that hardly makes me River, now does it?

So, I repeat: I don't get it.


--
"Mei-mei, everything I have is right here." -- Simon Tam

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, March 2, 2006 7:51 PM

asarian:
"...sowing my skin...."

You've got a lot of gall correcting anyone's spelling.
==================================
ALL
There is something called a "fog factor." William F. Buckley's writing has it bad. Those who don't get the intent of his writing generally don't jump in with both feet and openly declare their inability to grasp his intent. Instead, they ignore him. This is what could have happened here, but NO. Many apparently decided they were superior, or better posters, or better writers, or better reasoners, to agirlyman, couldn't see the intent and had to make some noise.

Shame on you.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, March 2, 2006 8:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ruxton:

asarian:
"...sowing my skin...."

You've got a lot of gall correcting anyone's spelling.




You got one; good on you!

As for the rest of your post, you got it all backwards: it was agirlyman who decided he was superior, or a better poster, or better writer, or better reasoner, to everyone else. That's what got him into trouble in the first place: you reap what you sew.


--
"Mei-mei, everything I have is right here." -- Simon Tam

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, March 2, 2006 8:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ruxton:
asarian:
"...sowing my skin...."

You've got a lot of gall correcting anyone's spelling.
==================================
ALL
There is something called a "fog factor." William F. Buckley's writing has it bad. Those who don't get the intent of his writing generally don't jump in with both feet and openly declare their inability to grasp his intent. Instead, they ignore him. This is what could have happened here, but NO. Many apparently decided they were superior, or better posters, or better writers, or better reasoners, to agirlyman, couldn't see the intent and had to make some noise.

Shame on you.



Ahem. Check the sequence of posts again. Better yet, check the title of this forum: General DISCUSSION. The only "noise" I heard before the inital condescending insult was the response: "I don't get it."

Ignore him? Again, D-I-S-C-U-S-S-I-O-N Group.
(Ok, THAT was condescending...sorry)

So shame on YOU.

:^)


--------------------------------
OPERATIVE: ...and I am unarmed.
MAL: Good.
(BLAM!)
--------------------------------
FIGHT TO RE-LIGHT!!
www.fortworthbrowncoats.com
--------------------------------

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, March 2, 2006 8:35 PM

"Ahem. Check the sequence of posts again."

I suggest you do so yourself, Jonestein. The second and third posts in this thread were by folks who didn't understand. If I don't understand something, I don't immediately and publicly declare my ignorance. I wait for clarification, or look stuff up. When these folks said they couldn't understand what was perfectly clear to some of us, they just set themselves up for the response they got. It's not really a hard concept to grasp, after all. If you don't get a subtle joke, would you want someone to ruin it for everyone by explaining it step by step? Hardly.

And why would I want to DISCUSS something I couldn't understand? Re: Bill Buckley, I have in fact corresponded with him, and would readily discuss sailing or shooting with him, but would never ask him anything about, say, Whittaker Chambers, about whom I know nothing.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME